Cargando…
Once-Weekly Exenatide Versus Once- or Twice-Daily Insulin Detemir: Randomized, open-label, clinical trial of efficacy and safety in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin alone or in combination with sulfonylureas
OBJECTIVE: This multicenter, open-label, parallel-arm study compared the efficacy and safety of exenatide once weekly (EQW) with titrated insulin detemir in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin (with or without sulfonylureas). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients wer...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Diabetes Association
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3631870/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23275363 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc12-1333 |
_version_ | 1782266821004492800 |
---|---|
author | Davies, Melanie Heller, Simon Sreenan, Seamus Sapin, Hélène Adetunji, Omolara Tahbaz, Arash Vora, Jiten |
author_facet | Davies, Melanie Heller, Simon Sreenan, Seamus Sapin, Hélène Adetunji, Omolara Tahbaz, Arash Vora, Jiten |
author_sort | Davies, Melanie |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This multicenter, open-label, parallel-arm study compared the efficacy and safety of exenatide once weekly (EQW) with titrated insulin detemir in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin (with or without sulfonylureas). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to EQW (2 mg) or detemir (once or twice daily, titrated to achieve fasting plasma glucose ≤5.5 mmol/L) for 26 weeks. The primary outcome was proportion of patients achieving A1C ≤7.0% and weight loss ≥1.0 kg at end point, analyzed by means of logistic regression. Secondary outcomes included measures of glycemic control, cardiovascular risk factors, and safety and tolerability. RESULTS: Of 216 patients (intent-to-treat population), 111 received EQW and 105 received detemir. Overall, 44.1% (95% CI, 34.7–53.9) of EQW-treated patients compared with 11.4% (6.0–19.1) of detemir-treated patients achieved the primary outcome (P < 0.0001). Treatment with EQW resulted in significantly greater reductions than detemir in A1C (least-square mean ± SE, −1.30 ± 0.08% vs. −0.88 ± 0.08%; P < 0.0001) and weight (−2.7 ± 0.3 kg vs. +0.8 ± 0.4 kg; P < 0.0001). Gastrointestinal-related and injection site–related adverse events occurred more frequently with EQW than with detemir. There was no major hypoglycemia in either group. Five (6%) patients in the EQW group and six (7%) patients in the detemir group experienced minor hypoglycemia; only one event occurred without concomitant sulfonylureas (detemir group). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with EQW resulted in a significantly greater proportion of patients achieving target A1C and weight loss than treatment with detemir, with a low risk of hypoglycemia. These results suggest that EQW is a viable alternative to insulin detemir treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes with inadequate glycemic control using oral antidiabetes drugs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3631870 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | American Diabetes Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36318702014-05-01 Once-Weekly Exenatide Versus Once- or Twice-Daily Insulin Detemir: Randomized, open-label, clinical trial of efficacy and safety in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin alone or in combination with sulfonylureas Davies, Melanie Heller, Simon Sreenan, Seamus Sapin, Hélène Adetunji, Omolara Tahbaz, Arash Vora, Jiten Diabetes Care Original Research OBJECTIVE: This multicenter, open-label, parallel-arm study compared the efficacy and safety of exenatide once weekly (EQW) with titrated insulin detemir in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin (with or without sulfonylureas). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to EQW (2 mg) or detemir (once or twice daily, titrated to achieve fasting plasma glucose ≤5.5 mmol/L) for 26 weeks. The primary outcome was proportion of patients achieving A1C ≤7.0% and weight loss ≥1.0 kg at end point, analyzed by means of logistic regression. Secondary outcomes included measures of glycemic control, cardiovascular risk factors, and safety and tolerability. RESULTS: Of 216 patients (intent-to-treat population), 111 received EQW and 105 received detemir. Overall, 44.1% (95% CI, 34.7–53.9) of EQW-treated patients compared with 11.4% (6.0–19.1) of detemir-treated patients achieved the primary outcome (P < 0.0001). Treatment with EQW resulted in significantly greater reductions than detemir in A1C (least-square mean ± SE, −1.30 ± 0.08% vs. −0.88 ± 0.08%; P < 0.0001) and weight (−2.7 ± 0.3 kg vs. +0.8 ± 0.4 kg; P < 0.0001). Gastrointestinal-related and injection site–related adverse events occurred more frequently with EQW than with detemir. There was no major hypoglycemia in either group. Five (6%) patients in the EQW group and six (7%) patients in the detemir group experienced minor hypoglycemia; only one event occurred without concomitant sulfonylureas (detemir group). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with EQW resulted in a significantly greater proportion of patients achieving target A1C and weight loss than treatment with detemir, with a low risk of hypoglycemia. These results suggest that EQW is a viable alternative to insulin detemir treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes with inadequate glycemic control using oral antidiabetes drugs. American Diabetes Association 2013-05 2013-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3631870/ /pubmed/23275363 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc12-1333 Text en © 2013 by the American Diabetes Association. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Davies, Melanie Heller, Simon Sreenan, Seamus Sapin, Hélène Adetunji, Omolara Tahbaz, Arash Vora, Jiten Once-Weekly Exenatide Versus Once- or Twice-Daily Insulin Detemir: Randomized, open-label, clinical trial of efficacy and safety in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin alone or in combination with sulfonylureas |
title | Once-Weekly Exenatide Versus Once- or Twice-Daily Insulin Detemir: Randomized, open-label, clinical trial of efficacy and safety in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin alone or in combination with sulfonylureas |
title_full | Once-Weekly Exenatide Versus Once- or Twice-Daily Insulin Detemir: Randomized, open-label, clinical trial of efficacy and safety in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin alone or in combination with sulfonylureas |
title_fullStr | Once-Weekly Exenatide Versus Once- or Twice-Daily Insulin Detemir: Randomized, open-label, clinical trial of efficacy and safety in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin alone or in combination with sulfonylureas |
title_full_unstemmed | Once-Weekly Exenatide Versus Once- or Twice-Daily Insulin Detemir: Randomized, open-label, clinical trial of efficacy and safety in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin alone or in combination with sulfonylureas |
title_short | Once-Weekly Exenatide Versus Once- or Twice-Daily Insulin Detemir: Randomized, open-label, clinical trial of efficacy and safety in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin alone or in combination with sulfonylureas |
title_sort | once-weekly exenatide versus once- or twice-daily insulin detemir: randomized, open-label, clinical trial of efficacy and safety in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin alone or in combination with sulfonylureas |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3631870/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23275363 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc12-1333 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT daviesmelanie onceweeklyexenatideversusonceortwicedailyinsulindetemirrandomizedopenlabelclinicaltrialofefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithtype2diabetestreatedwithmetforminaloneorincombinationwithsulfonylureas AT hellersimon onceweeklyexenatideversusonceortwicedailyinsulindetemirrandomizedopenlabelclinicaltrialofefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithtype2diabetestreatedwithmetforminaloneorincombinationwithsulfonylureas AT sreenanseamus onceweeklyexenatideversusonceortwicedailyinsulindetemirrandomizedopenlabelclinicaltrialofefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithtype2diabetestreatedwithmetforminaloneorincombinationwithsulfonylureas AT sapinhelene onceweeklyexenatideversusonceortwicedailyinsulindetemirrandomizedopenlabelclinicaltrialofefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithtype2diabetestreatedwithmetforminaloneorincombinationwithsulfonylureas AT adetunjiomolara onceweeklyexenatideversusonceortwicedailyinsulindetemirrandomizedopenlabelclinicaltrialofefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithtype2diabetestreatedwithmetforminaloneorincombinationwithsulfonylureas AT tahbazarash onceweeklyexenatideversusonceortwicedailyinsulindetemirrandomizedopenlabelclinicaltrialofefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithtype2diabetestreatedwithmetforminaloneorincombinationwithsulfonylureas AT vorajiten onceweeklyexenatideversusonceortwicedailyinsulindetemirrandomizedopenlabelclinicaltrialofefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithtype2diabetestreatedwithmetforminaloneorincombinationwithsulfonylureas |