Cargando…

Once-Weekly Exenatide Versus Once- or Twice-Daily Insulin Detemir: Randomized, open-label, clinical trial of efficacy and safety in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin alone or in combination with sulfonylureas

OBJECTIVE: This multicenter, open-label, parallel-arm study compared the efficacy and safety of exenatide once weekly (EQW) with titrated insulin detemir in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin (with or without sulfonylureas). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients wer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Davies, Melanie, Heller, Simon, Sreenan, Seamus, Sapin, Hélène, Adetunji, Omolara, Tahbaz, Arash, Vora, Jiten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Diabetes Association 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3631870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23275363
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc12-1333
_version_ 1782266821004492800
author Davies, Melanie
Heller, Simon
Sreenan, Seamus
Sapin, Hélène
Adetunji, Omolara
Tahbaz, Arash
Vora, Jiten
author_facet Davies, Melanie
Heller, Simon
Sreenan, Seamus
Sapin, Hélène
Adetunji, Omolara
Tahbaz, Arash
Vora, Jiten
author_sort Davies, Melanie
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This multicenter, open-label, parallel-arm study compared the efficacy and safety of exenatide once weekly (EQW) with titrated insulin detemir in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin (with or without sulfonylureas). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to EQW (2 mg) or detemir (once or twice daily, titrated to achieve fasting plasma glucose ≤5.5 mmol/L) for 26 weeks. The primary outcome was proportion of patients achieving A1C ≤7.0% and weight loss ≥1.0 kg at end point, analyzed by means of logistic regression. Secondary outcomes included measures of glycemic control, cardiovascular risk factors, and safety and tolerability. RESULTS: Of 216 patients (intent-to-treat population), 111 received EQW and 105 received detemir. Overall, 44.1% (95% CI, 34.7–53.9) of EQW-treated patients compared with 11.4% (6.0–19.1) of detemir-treated patients achieved the primary outcome (P < 0.0001). Treatment with EQW resulted in significantly greater reductions than detemir in A1C (least-square mean ± SE, −1.30 ± 0.08% vs. −0.88 ± 0.08%; P < 0.0001) and weight (−2.7 ± 0.3 kg vs. +0.8 ± 0.4 kg; P < 0.0001). Gastrointestinal-related and injection site–related adverse events occurred more frequently with EQW than with detemir. There was no major hypoglycemia in either group. Five (6%) patients in the EQW group and six (7%) patients in the detemir group experienced minor hypoglycemia; only one event occurred without concomitant sulfonylureas (detemir group). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with EQW resulted in a significantly greater proportion of patients achieving target A1C and weight loss than treatment with detemir, with a low risk of hypoglycemia. These results suggest that EQW is a viable alternative to insulin detemir treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes with inadequate glycemic control using oral antidiabetes drugs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3631870
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher American Diabetes Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36318702014-05-01 Once-Weekly Exenatide Versus Once- or Twice-Daily Insulin Detemir: Randomized, open-label, clinical trial of efficacy and safety in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin alone or in combination with sulfonylureas Davies, Melanie Heller, Simon Sreenan, Seamus Sapin, Hélène Adetunji, Omolara Tahbaz, Arash Vora, Jiten Diabetes Care Original Research OBJECTIVE: This multicenter, open-label, parallel-arm study compared the efficacy and safety of exenatide once weekly (EQW) with titrated insulin detemir in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin (with or without sulfonylureas). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to EQW (2 mg) or detemir (once or twice daily, titrated to achieve fasting plasma glucose ≤5.5 mmol/L) for 26 weeks. The primary outcome was proportion of patients achieving A1C ≤7.0% and weight loss ≥1.0 kg at end point, analyzed by means of logistic regression. Secondary outcomes included measures of glycemic control, cardiovascular risk factors, and safety and tolerability. RESULTS: Of 216 patients (intent-to-treat population), 111 received EQW and 105 received detemir. Overall, 44.1% (95% CI, 34.7–53.9) of EQW-treated patients compared with 11.4% (6.0–19.1) of detemir-treated patients achieved the primary outcome (P < 0.0001). Treatment with EQW resulted in significantly greater reductions than detemir in A1C (least-square mean ± SE, −1.30 ± 0.08% vs. −0.88 ± 0.08%; P < 0.0001) and weight (−2.7 ± 0.3 kg vs. +0.8 ± 0.4 kg; P < 0.0001). Gastrointestinal-related and injection site–related adverse events occurred more frequently with EQW than with detemir. There was no major hypoglycemia in either group. Five (6%) patients in the EQW group and six (7%) patients in the detemir group experienced minor hypoglycemia; only one event occurred without concomitant sulfonylureas (detemir group). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with EQW resulted in a significantly greater proportion of patients achieving target A1C and weight loss than treatment with detemir, with a low risk of hypoglycemia. These results suggest that EQW is a viable alternative to insulin detemir treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes with inadequate glycemic control using oral antidiabetes drugs. American Diabetes Association 2013-05 2013-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3631870/ /pubmed/23275363 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc12-1333 Text en © 2013 by the American Diabetes Association. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details.
spellingShingle Original Research
Davies, Melanie
Heller, Simon
Sreenan, Seamus
Sapin, Hélène
Adetunji, Omolara
Tahbaz, Arash
Vora, Jiten
Once-Weekly Exenatide Versus Once- or Twice-Daily Insulin Detemir: Randomized, open-label, clinical trial of efficacy and safety in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin alone or in combination with sulfonylureas
title Once-Weekly Exenatide Versus Once- or Twice-Daily Insulin Detemir: Randomized, open-label, clinical trial of efficacy and safety in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin alone or in combination with sulfonylureas
title_full Once-Weekly Exenatide Versus Once- or Twice-Daily Insulin Detemir: Randomized, open-label, clinical trial of efficacy and safety in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin alone or in combination with sulfonylureas
title_fullStr Once-Weekly Exenatide Versus Once- or Twice-Daily Insulin Detemir: Randomized, open-label, clinical trial of efficacy and safety in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin alone or in combination with sulfonylureas
title_full_unstemmed Once-Weekly Exenatide Versus Once- or Twice-Daily Insulin Detemir: Randomized, open-label, clinical trial of efficacy and safety in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin alone or in combination with sulfonylureas
title_short Once-Weekly Exenatide Versus Once- or Twice-Daily Insulin Detemir: Randomized, open-label, clinical trial of efficacy and safety in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin alone or in combination with sulfonylureas
title_sort once-weekly exenatide versus once- or twice-daily insulin detemir: randomized, open-label, clinical trial of efficacy and safety in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin alone or in combination with sulfonylureas
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3631870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23275363
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc12-1333
work_keys_str_mv AT daviesmelanie onceweeklyexenatideversusonceortwicedailyinsulindetemirrandomizedopenlabelclinicaltrialofefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithtype2diabetestreatedwithmetforminaloneorincombinationwithsulfonylureas
AT hellersimon onceweeklyexenatideversusonceortwicedailyinsulindetemirrandomizedopenlabelclinicaltrialofefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithtype2diabetestreatedwithmetforminaloneorincombinationwithsulfonylureas
AT sreenanseamus onceweeklyexenatideversusonceortwicedailyinsulindetemirrandomizedopenlabelclinicaltrialofefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithtype2diabetestreatedwithmetforminaloneorincombinationwithsulfonylureas
AT sapinhelene onceweeklyexenatideversusonceortwicedailyinsulindetemirrandomizedopenlabelclinicaltrialofefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithtype2diabetestreatedwithmetforminaloneorincombinationwithsulfonylureas
AT adetunjiomolara onceweeklyexenatideversusonceortwicedailyinsulindetemirrandomizedopenlabelclinicaltrialofefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithtype2diabetestreatedwithmetforminaloneorincombinationwithsulfonylureas
AT tahbazarash onceweeklyexenatideversusonceortwicedailyinsulindetemirrandomizedopenlabelclinicaltrialofefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithtype2diabetestreatedwithmetforminaloneorincombinationwithsulfonylureas
AT vorajiten onceweeklyexenatideversusonceortwicedailyinsulindetemirrandomizedopenlabelclinicaltrialofefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithtype2diabetestreatedwithmetforminaloneorincombinationwithsulfonylureas