Cargando…

QUALITY INDICATORS TO ASSESS A COLORECTAL CANCER PREVENTION PROGRAM

Objectives: The aim of this study was to implement a set of indicators to assess the quality of care of a new healthcare model for prevention of colorectal cancer in a high-risk population. Methods: Information was obtained retrospectively from electronic clinical records, review of documentation, a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Serra-Sutton, Victoria, Serrano, Carmela Barrantes, Carreras, Mireia Espallargues
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3631961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23587309
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0266462313000020
_version_ 1782266825584672768
author Serra-Sutton, Victoria
Serrano, Carmela Barrantes
Carreras, Mireia Espallargues
author_facet Serra-Sutton, Victoria
Serrano, Carmela Barrantes
Carreras, Mireia Espallargues
author_sort Serra-Sutton, Victoria
collection PubMed
description Objectives: The aim of this study was to implement a set of indicators to assess the quality of care of a new healthcare model for prevention of colorectal cancer in a high-risk population. Methods: Information was obtained retrospectively from electronic clinical records, review of documentation, and a survey. The high-risk clinic for colorectal cancer was created in Barcelona (Spain) in 2006. All users at greater risk of colorectal cancer assessed through the new healthcare model were included. Twenty-one indicators were computed using defined formulas and standards. Logistic regression models were computed to analyze factors related to adherence to the screening and surveillance prevention strategies. Results: A total of 1,275 users were included. Eight of seventeen indicators reached the quality standard (80 percent structure, 50 percent process, and 17 percent outcome), whereas four indicators did not have a previously defined standard. The overall adherence to the screening and surveillance program was 67 percent. Users aged 59 and older had almost two times greater probabiblity (95 percent confidence interval [CI], 1.3–3.1) of adherence than younger users; users with surveillance colonoscopies presented a 7.4 times (95 percent CI, 4.6–11.7) greater probability of adherence than those with screening colonoscopies. Conclusions: The indicators have been shown to be feasible and valid tools to identify areas of improvement in this new model, such as information systems, continuity of care, and communication among professionals. Because this was the first time these indicators were applied to assess the high-risk clinic for colorectal cancer, further implementation is required to improve the interpretability of results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3631961
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36319612013-04-22 QUALITY INDICATORS TO ASSESS A COLORECTAL CANCER PREVENTION PROGRAM Serra-Sutton, Victoria Serrano, Carmela Barrantes Carreras, Mireia Espallargues Int J Technol Assess Health Care Assessments Objectives: The aim of this study was to implement a set of indicators to assess the quality of care of a new healthcare model for prevention of colorectal cancer in a high-risk population. Methods: Information was obtained retrospectively from electronic clinical records, review of documentation, and a survey. The high-risk clinic for colorectal cancer was created in Barcelona (Spain) in 2006. All users at greater risk of colorectal cancer assessed through the new healthcare model were included. Twenty-one indicators were computed using defined formulas and standards. Logistic regression models were computed to analyze factors related to adherence to the screening and surveillance prevention strategies. Results: A total of 1,275 users were included. Eight of seventeen indicators reached the quality standard (80 percent structure, 50 percent process, and 17 percent outcome), whereas four indicators did not have a previously defined standard. The overall adherence to the screening and surveillance program was 67 percent. Users aged 59 and older had almost two times greater probabiblity (95 percent confidence interval [CI], 1.3–3.1) of adherence than younger users; users with surveillance colonoscopies presented a 7.4 times (95 percent CI, 4.6–11.7) greater probability of adherence than those with screening colonoscopies. Conclusions: The indicators have been shown to be feasible and valid tools to identify areas of improvement in this new model, such as information systems, continuity of care, and communication among professionals. Because this was the first time these indicators were applied to assess the high-risk clinic for colorectal cancer, further implementation is required to improve the interpretability of results. Cambridge University Press 2013-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3631961/ /pubmed/23587309 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0266462313000020 Text en © Cambridge University Press 2013 The online version of this article is published within an Open Access environment subject to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/>. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use.
spellingShingle Assessments
Serra-Sutton, Victoria
Serrano, Carmela Barrantes
Carreras, Mireia Espallargues
QUALITY INDICATORS TO ASSESS A COLORECTAL CANCER PREVENTION PROGRAM
title QUALITY INDICATORS TO ASSESS A COLORECTAL CANCER PREVENTION PROGRAM
title_full QUALITY INDICATORS TO ASSESS A COLORECTAL CANCER PREVENTION PROGRAM
title_fullStr QUALITY INDICATORS TO ASSESS A COLORECTAL CANCER PREVENTION PROGRAM
title_full_unstemmed QUALITY INDICATORS TO ASSESS A COLORECTAL CANCER PREVENTION PROGRAM
title_short QUALITY INDICATORS TO ASSESS A COLORECTAL CANCER PREVENTION PROGRAM
title_sort quality indicators to assess a colorectal cancer prevention program
topic Assessments
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3631961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23587309
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0266462313000020
work_keys_str_mv AT serrasuttonvictoria qualityindicatorstoassessacolorectalcancerpreventionprogram
AT serranocarmelabarrantes qualityindicatorstoassessacolorectalcancerpreventionprogram
AT carrerasmireiaespallargues qualityindicatorstoassessacolorectalcancerpreventionprogram