Cargando…

Array CGH as a first line diagnostic test in place of karyotyping for postnatal referrals - results from four years’ clinical application for over 8,700 patients

BACKGROUND: Array CGH is widely used in cytogenetics centres for postnatal constitutional genome analysis, and is now recommended as a first line test in place of G-banded chromosome analysis. At our centre, first line testing by oligonucleotide array CGH for all constitutional referrals for genome...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahn, Joo Wook, Bint, Susan, Bergbaum, Anne, Mann, Kathy, Hall, Richard P, Ogilvie, Caroline Mackie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3632487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23560982
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1755-8166-6-16
_version_ 1782266864807706624
author Ahn, Joo Wook
Bint, Susan
Bergbaum, Anne
Mann, Kathy
Hall, Richard P
Ogilvie, Caroline Mackie
author_facet Ahn, Joo Wook
Bint, Susan
Bergbaum, Anne
Mann, Kathy
Hall, Richard P
Ogilvie, Caroline Mackie
author_sort Ahn, Joo Wook
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Array CGH is widely used in cytogenetics centres for postnatal constitutional genome analysis, and is now recommended as a first line test in place of G-banded chromosome analysis. At our centre, first line testing by oligonucleotide array CGH for all constitutional referrals for genome imbalance has been in place since June 2008, using a patient vs patient hybridisation strategy to minimise costs. FINDINGS: Out of a total of 13,412 patients tested with array CGH, 8,794 (66%) had array CGH as the first line test. Referral indications for this first line group ranged from neonatal congenital anomalies through to adult neurodisabilities; 25% of these patients had CNVs either in known pathogenic regions or in other regions where imbalances have not been reported in the normal population. Of these CNVs, 46% were deletions or nullisomy, 53% were duplications or triplications, and mosaic imbalances made up the remainder; 87% were <5Mb and would likely not be detected by G-banded chromosome analysis. For cases with completed inheritance studies, 20% of imbalances were de novo. CONCLUSIONS: Array CGH is a robust and cost-effective alternative to traditional cytogenetic methodology; it provides a higher diagnostic detection rate than G-banded chromosome analysis, and adds to the sum of information and understanding of the role of genomic imbalance in disease. Use of novel hybridisation strategies can reduce costs, allowing more widespread testing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3632487
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36324872013-04-23 Array CGH as a first line diagnostic test in place of karyotyping for postnatal referrals - results from four years’ clinical application for over 8,700 patients Ahn, Joo Wook Bint, Susan Bergbaum, Anne Mann, Kathy Hall, Richard P Ogilvie, Caroline Mackie Mol Cytogenet Short Report BACKGROUND: Array CGH is widely used in cytogenetics centres for postnatal constitutional genome analysis, and is now recommended as a first line test in place of G-banded chromosome analysis. At our centre, first line testing by oligonucleotide array CGH for all constitutional referrals for genome imbalance has been in place since June 2008, using a patient vs patient hybridisation strategy to minimise costs. FINDINGS: Out of a total of 13,412 patients tested with array CGH, 8,794 (66%) had array CGH as the first line test. Referral indications for this first line group ranged from neonatal congenital anomalies through to adult neurodisabilities; 25% of these patients had CNVs either in known pathogenic regions or in other regions where imbalances have not been reported in the normal population. Of these CNVs, 46% were deletions or nullisomy, 53% were duplications or triplications, and mosaic imbalances made up the remainder; 87% were <5Mb and would likely not be detected by G-banded chromosome analysis. For cases with completed inheritance studies, 20% of imbalances were de novo. CONCLUSIONS: Array CGH is a robust and cost-effective alternative to traditional cytogenetic methodology; it provides a higher diagnostic detection rate than G-banded chromosome analysis, and adds to the sum of information and understanding of the role of genomic imbalance in disease. Use of novel hybridisation strategies can reduce costs, allowing more widespread testing. BioMed Central 2013-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3632487/ /pubmed/23560982 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1755-8166-6-16 Text en Copyright © 2013 Ahn et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Short Report
Ahn, Joo Wook
Bint, Susan
Bergbaum, Anne
Mann, Kathy
Hall, Richard P
Ogilvie, Caroline Mackie
Array CGH as a first line diagnostic test in place of karyotyping for postnatal referrals - results from four years’ clinical application for over 8,700 patients
title Array CGH as a first line diagnostic test in place of karyotyping for postnatal referrals - results from four years’ clinical application for over 8,700 patients
title_full Array CGH as a first line diagnostic test in place of karyotyping for postnatal referrals - results from four years’ clinical application for over 8,700 patients
title_fullStr Array CGH as a first line diagnostic test in place of karyotyping for postnatal referrals - results from four years’ clinical application for over 8,700 patients
title_full_unstemmed Array CGH as a first line diagnostic test in place of karyotyping for postnatal referrals - results from four years’ clinical application for over 8,700 patients
title_short Array CGH as a first line diagnostic test in place of karyotyping for postnatal referrals - results from four years’ clinical application for over 8,700 patients
title_sort array cgh as a first line diagnostic test in place of karyotyping for postnatal referrals - results from four years’ clinical application for over 8,700 patients
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3632487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23560982
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1755-8166-6-16
work_keys_str_mv AT ahnjoowook arraycghasafirstlinediagnostictestinplaceofkaryotypingforpostnatalreferralsresultsfromfouryearsclinicalapplicationforover8700patients
AT bintsusan arraycghasafirstlinediagnostictestinplaceofkaryotypingforpostnatalreferralsresultsfromfouryearsclinicalapplicationforover8700patients
AT bergbaumanne arraycghasafirstlinediagnostictestinplaceofkaryotypingforpostnatalreferralsresultsfromfouryearsclinicalapplicationforover8700patients
AT mannkathy arraycghasafirstlinediagnostictestinplaceofkaryotypingforpostnatalreferralsresultsfromfouryearsclinicalapplicationforover8700patients
AT hallrichardp arraycghasafirstlinediagnostictestinplaceofkaryotypingforpostnatalreferralsresultsfromfouryearsclinicalapplicationforover8700patients
AT ogilviecarolinemackie arraycghasafirstlinediagnostictestinplaceofkaryotypingforpostnatalreferralsresultsfromfouryearsclinicalapplicationforover8700patients