Cargando…

Ecosystem Function in Appalachian Headwater Streams during an Active Invasion by the Hemlock Woolly Adelgid

Forested ecosystems in the southeastern United States are currently undergoing an invasion by the hemlock woolly adelgid (HWA). Previous studies in this area have shown changes to forest structure, decreases in canopy cover, increases in organic matter, and changes to nutrient cycling on the forest...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Northington, Robert M., Webster, Jackson R., Benfield, Ernest F., Cheever, Beth M., Niederlehner, Barbara R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3632569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23613803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061171
_version_ 1782266881734868992
author Northington, Robert M.
Webster, Jackson R.
Benfield, Ernest F.
Cheever, Beth M.
Niederlehner, Barbara R.
author_facet Northington, Robert M.
Webster, Jackson R.
Benfield, Ernest F.
Cheever, Beth M.
Niederlehner, Barbara R.
author_sort Northington, Robert M.
collection PubMed
description Forested ecosystems in the southeastern United States are currently undergoing an invasion by the hemlock woolly adelgid (HWA). Previous studies in this area have shown changes to forest structure, decreases in canopy cover, increases in organic matter, and changes to nutrient cycling on the forest floor and soil. Here, we were interested in how the effects of canopy loss and nutrient leakage from terrestrial areas would translate into functional changes in streams draining affected watersheds. We addressed these questions in HWA-infested watersheds at the Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory in North Carolina. Specifically, we measured stream metabolism (gross primary production and ecosystem respiration) and nitrogen uptake from 2008 to 2011 in five streams across the Coweeta basin. Over the course of our study, we found no change to in-stream nutrient concentrations. While canopy cover decreased annually in these watersheds, this change in light penetration did not translate to higher rates of in-stream primary production during the summer months of our study. We found a trend towards greater heterotrophy within our watersheds, where in-stream respiration accounted for a much larger component of net ecosystem production than GPP. Additionally, increases in rhododendron cover may counteract changes in light and nutrient availability that occurred with hemlock loss. The variability in our metabolic and uptake parameters suggests an actively-infested ecosystem in transition between steady states.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3632569
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36325692013-04-23 Ecosystem Function in Appalachian Headwater Streams during an Active Invasion by the Hemlock Woolly Adelgid Northington, Robert M. Webster, Jackson R. Benfield, Ernest F. Cheever, Beth M. Niederlehner, Barbara R. PLoS One Research Article Forested ecosystems in the southeastern United States are currently undergoing an invasion by the hemlock woolly adelgid (HWA). Previous studies in this area have shown changes to forest structure, decreases in canopy cover, increases in organic matter, and changes to nutrient cycling on the forest floor and soil. Here, we were interested in how the effects of canopy loss and nutrient leakage from terrestrial areas would translate into functional changes in streams draining affected watersheds. We addressed these questions in HWA-infested watersheds at the Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory in North Carolina. Specifically, we measured stream metabolism (gross primary production and ecosystem respiration) and nitrogen uptake from 2008 to 2011 in five streams across the Coweeta basin. Over the course of our study, we found no change to in-stream nutrient concentrations. While canopy cover decreased annually in these watersheds, this change in light penetration did not translate to higher rates of in-stream primary production during the summer months of our study. We found a trend towards greater heterotrophy within our watersheds, where in-stream respiration accounted for a much larger component of net ecosystem production than GPP. Additionally, increases in rhododendron cover may counteract changes in light and nutrient availability that occurred with hemlock loss. The variability in our metabolic and uptake parameters suggests an actively-infested ecosystem in transition between steady states. Public Library of Science 2013-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3632569/ /pubmed/23613803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061171 Text en © 2013 Northington et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Northington, Robert M.
Webster, Jackson R.
Benfield, Ernest F.
Cheever, Beth M.
Niederlehner, Barbara R.
Ecosystem Function in Appalachian Headwater Streams during an Active Invasion by the Hemlock Woolly Adelgid
title Ecosystem Function in Appalachian Headwater Streams during an Active Invasion by the Hemlock Woolly Adelgid
title_full Ecosystem Function in Appalachian Headwater Streams during an Active Invasion by the Hemlock Woolly Adelgid
title_fullStr Ecosystem Function in Appalachian Headwater Streams during an Active Invasion by the Hemlock Woolly Adelgid
title_full_unstemmed Ecosystem Function in Appalachian Headwater Streams during an Active Invasion by the Hemlock Woolly Adelgid
title_short Ecosystem Function in Appalachian Headwater Streams during an Active Invasion by the Hemlock Woolly Adelgid
title_sort ecosystem function in appalachian headwater streams during an active invasion by the hemlock woolly adelgid
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3632569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23613803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061171
work_keys_str_mv AT northingtonrobertm ecosystemfunctioninappalachianheadwaterstreamsduringanactiveinvasionbythehemlockwoollyadelgid
AT websterjacksonr ecosystemfunctioninappalachianheadwaterstreamsduringanactiveinvasionbythehemlockwoollyadelgid
AT benfieldernestf ecosystemfunctioninappalachianheadwaterstreamsduringanactiveinvasionbythehemlockwoollyadelgid
AT cheeverbethm ecosystemfunctioninappalachianheadwaterstreamsduringanactiveinvasionbythehemlockwoollyadelgid
AT niederlehnerbarbarar ecosystemfunctioninappalachianheadwaterstreamsduringanactiveinvasionbythehemlockwoollyadelgid