Cargando…

Accounting for Imperfect Detection Is Critical for Inferring Marine Turtle Nesting Population Trends

Assessments of population trends based on time-series counts of individuals are complicated by imperfect detection, which can lead to serious misinterpretations of data. Population trends of threatened marine turtles worldwide are usually based on counts of nests or nesting females. We analyze 39 ye...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pfaller, Joseph B., Bjorndal, Karen A., Chaloupka, Milani, Williams, Kristina L., Frick, Michael G., Bolten, Alan B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3634727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23638041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062326
_version_ 1782267138060320768
author Pfaller, Joseph B.
Bjorndal, Karen A.
Chaloupka, Milani
Williams, Kristina L.
Frick, Michael G.
Bolten, Alan B.
author_facet Pfaller, Joseph B.
Bjorndal, Karen A.
Chaloupka, Milani
Williams, Kristina L.
Frick, Michael G.
Bolten, Alan B.
author_sort Pfaller, Joseph B.
collection PubMed
description Assessments of population trends based on time-series counts of individuals are complicated by imperfect detection, which can lead to serious misinterpretations of data. Population trends of threatened marine turtles worldwide are usually based on counts of nests or nesting females. We analyze 39 years of nest-count, female-count, and capture-mark-recapture (CMR) data for nesting loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta) on Wassaw Island, Georgia, USA. Annual counts of nests and females, not corrected for imperfect detection, yield significant, positive trends in abundance. However, multistate open robust design modeling of CMR data that accounts for changes in imperfect detection reveals that the annual abundance of nesting females has remained essentially constant over the 39-year period. The dichotomy could result from improvements in surveys or increased within-season nest-site fidelity in females, either of which would increase detection probability. For the first time in a marine turtle population, we compare results of population trend analyses that do and do not account for imperfect detection and demonstrate the potential for erroneous conclusions. Past assessments of marine turtle population trends based exclusively on count data should be interpreted with caution and re-evaluated when possible. These concerns apply equally to population assessments of all species with imperfect detection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3634727
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36347272013-05-01 Accounting for Imperfect Detection Is Critical for Inferring Marine Turtle Nesting Population Trends Pfaller, Joseph B. Bjorndal, Karen A. Chaloupka, Milani Williams, Kristina L. Frick, Michael G. Bolten, Alan B. PLoS One Research Article Assessments of population trends based on time-series counts of individuals are complicated by imperfect detection, which can lead to serious misinterpretations of data. Population trends of threatened marine turtles worldwide are usually based on counts of nests or nesting females. We analyze 39 years of nest-count, female-count, and capture-mark-recapture (CMR) data for nesting loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta) on Wassaw Island, Georgia, USA. Annual counts of nests and females, not corrected for imperfect detection, yield significant, positive trends in abundance. However, multistate open robust design modeling of CMR data that accounts for changes in imperfect detection reveals that the annual abundance of nesting females has remained essentially constant over the 39-year period. The dichotomy could result from improvements in surveys or increased within-season nest-site fidelity in females, either of which would increase detection probability. For the first time in a marine turtle population, we compare results of population trend analyses that do and do not account for imperfect detection and demonstrate the potential for erroneous conclusions. Past assessments of marine turtle population trends based exclusively on count data should be interpreted with caution and re-evaluated when possible. These concerns apply equally to population assessments of all species with imperfect detection. Public Library of Science 2013-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3634727/ /pubmed/23638041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062326 Text en © 2013 Pfaller et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pfaller, Joseph B.
Bjorndal, Karen A.
Chaloupka, Milani
Williams, Kristina L.
Frick, Michael G.
Bolten, Alan B.
Accounting for Imperfect Detection Is Critical for Inferring Marine Turtle Nesting Population Trends
title Accounting for Imperfect Detection Is Critical for Inferring Marine Turtle Nesting Population Trends
title_full Accounting for Imperfect Detection Is Critical for Inferring Marine Turtle Nesting Population Trends
title_fullStr Accounting for Imperfect Detection Is Critical for Inferring Marine Turtle Nesting Population Trends
title_full_unstemmed Accounting for Imperfect Detection Is Critical for Inferring Marine Turtle Nesting Population Trends
title_short Accounting for Imperfect Detection Is Critical for Inferring Marine Turtle Nesting Population Trends
title_sort accounting for imperfect detection is critical for inferring marine turtle nesting population trends
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3634727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23638041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062326
work_keys_str_mv AT pfallerjosephb accountingforimperfectdetectioniscriticalforinferringmarineturtlenestingpopulationtrends
AT bjorndalkarena accountingforimperfectdetectioniscriticalforinferringmarineturtlenestingpopulationtrends
AT chaloupkamilani accountingforimperfectdetectioniscriticalforinferringmarineturtlenestingpopulationtrends
AT williamskristinal accountingforimperfectdetectioniscriticalforinferringmarineturtlenestingpopulationtrends
AT frickmichaelg accountingforimperfectdetectioniscriticalforinferringmarineturtlenestingpopulationtrends
AT boltenalanb accountingforimperfectdetectioniscriticalforinferringmarineturtlenestingpopulationtrends