Cargando…
Accounting for Imperfect Detection Is Critical for Inferring Marine Turtle Nesting Population Trends
Assessments of population trends based on time-series counts of individuals are complicated by imperfect detection, which can lead to serious misinterpretations of data. Population trends of threatened marine turtles worldwide are usually based on counts of nests or nesting females. We analyze 39 ye...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3634727/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23638041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062326 |
_version_ | 1782267138060320768 |
---|---|
author | Pfaller, Joseph B. Bjorndal, Karen A. Chaloupka, Milani Williams, Kristina L. Frick, Michael G. Bolten, Alan B. |
author_facet | Pfaller, Joseph B. Bjorndal, Karen A. Chaloupka, Milani Williams, Kristina L. Frick, Michael G. Bolten, Alan B. |
author_sort | Pfaller, Joseph B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Assessments of population trends based on time-series counts of individuals are complicated by imperfect detection, which can lead to serious misinterpretations of data. Population trends of threatened marine turtles worldwide are usually based on counts of nests or nesting females. We analyze 39 years of nest-count, female-count, and capture-mark-recapture (CMR) data for nesting loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta) on Wassaw Island, Georgia, USA. Annual counts of nests and females, not corrected for imperfect detection, yield significant, positive trends in abundance. However, multistate open robust design modeling of CMR data that accounts for changes in imperfect detection reveals that the annual abundance of nesting females has remained essentially constant over the 39-year period. The dichotomy could result from improvements in surveys or increased within-season nest-site fidelity in females, either of which would increase detection probability. For the first time in a marine turtle population, we compare results of population trend analyses that do and do not account for imperfect detection and demonstrate the potential for erroneous conclusions. Past assessments of marine turtle population trends based exclusively on count data should be interpreted with caution and re-evaluated when possible. These concerns apply equally to population assessments of all species with imperfect detection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3634727 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36347272013-05-01 Accounting for Imperfect Detection Is Critical for Inferring Marine Turtle Nesting Population Trends Pfaller, Joseph B. Bjorndal, Karen A. Chaloupka, Milani Williams, Kristina L. Frick, Michael G. Bolten, Alan B. PLoS One Research Article Assessments of population trends based on time-series counts of individuals are complicated by imperfect detection, which can lead to serious misinterpretations of data. Population trends of threatened marine turtles worldwide are usually based on counts of nests or nesting females. We analyze 39 years of nest-count, female-count, and capture-mark-recapture (CMR) data for nesting loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta) on Wassaw Island, Georgia, USA. Annual counts of nests and females, not corrected for imperfect detection, yield significant, positive trends in abundance. However, multistate open robust design modeling of CMR data that accounts for changes in imperfect detection reveals that the annual abundance of nesting females has remained essentially constant over the 39-year period. The dichotomy could result from improvements in surveys or increased within-season nest-site fidelity in females, either of which would increase detection probability. For the first time in a marine turtle population, we compare results of population trend analyses that do and do not account for imperfect detection and demonstrate the potential for erroneous conclusions. Past assessments of marine turtle population trends based exclusively on count data should be interpreted with caution and re-evaluated when possible. These concerns apply equally to population assessments of all species with imperfect detection. Public Library of Science 2013-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3634727/ /pubmed/23638041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062326 Text en © 2013 Pfaller et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Pfaller, Joseph B. Bjorndal, Karen A. Chaloupka, Milani Williams, Kristina L. Frick, Michael G. Bolten, Alan B. Accounting for Imperfect Detection Is Critical for Inferring Marine Turtle Nesting Population Trends |
title | Accounting for Imperfect Detection Is Critical for Inferring Marine Turtle Nesting Population Trends |
title_full | Accounting for Imperfect Detection Is Critical for Inferring Marine Turtle Nesting Population Trends |
title_fullStr | Accounting for Imperfect Detection Is Critical for Inferring Marine Turtle Nesting Population Trends |
title_full_unstemmed | Accounting for Imperfect Detection Is Critical for Inferring Marine Turtle Nesting Population Trends |
title_short | Accounting for Imperfect Detection Is Critical for Inferring Marine Turtle Nesting Population Trends |
title_sort | accounting for imperfect detection is critical for inferring marine turtle nesting population trends |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3634727/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23638041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062326 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pfallerjosephb accountingforimperfectdetectioniscriticalforinferringmarineturtlenestingpopulationtrends AT bjorndalkarena accountingforimperfectdetectioniscriticalforinferringmarineturtlenestingpopulationtrends AT chaloupkamilani accountingforimperfectdetectioniscriticalforinferringmarineturtlenestingpopulationtrends AT williamskristinal accountingforimperfectdetectioniscriticalforinferringmarineturtlenestingpopulationtrends AT frickmichaelg accountingforimperfectdetectioniscriticalforinferringmarineturtlenestingpopulationtrends AT boltenalanb accountingforimperfectdetectioniscriticalforinferringmarineturtlenestingpopulationtrends |