Cargando…

The minimal inhibitory concentration for sulbactam was not associated with the outcome of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter sp. treated with ampicillin/sulbactam

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the outcomes of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter infections treated with ampicillin/sulbactam were associated with the in vitro susceptibility profiles. METHODS: Twenty-two infections were treated with ampicillin/sulbactam. The median...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Oliveira, Maura S., Costa, Silvia Figueiredo, de Pedri, Ewerton, van der Heijden, Inneke, Levin, Anna Sara S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3634950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23778333
http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2013(04)21
_version_ 1782267168542425088
author de Oliveira, Maura S.
Costa, Silvia Figueiredo
de Pedri, Ewerton
van der Heijden, Inneke
Levin, Anna Sara S.
author_facet de Oliveira, Maura S.
Costa, Silvia Figueiredo
de Pedri, Ewerton
van der Heijden, Inneke
Levin, Anna Sara S.
author_sort de Oliveira, Maura S.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the outcomes of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter infections treated with ampicillin/sulbactam were associated with the in vitro susceptibility profiles. METHODS: Twenty-two infections were treated with ampicillin/sulbactam. The median treatment duration was 14 days (range: 3-19 days), and the median daily dose was 9 g (range: 1.5-12 g). The median time between Acinetobacter isolation and treatment was 4 days (range: 0-11 days). RESULTS: The sulbactam minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) ranged from 2.0 to 32.0 mg/L, and the MIC was not associated with patient outcome, as 4 of 5 (80%) patients with a resistant infection (MIC≥16), 5 of 10 (50%) patients with intermediate isolates (MIC of 8) and only 1 of 7 (14%) patients with susceptible isolates (MIC ≤4) survived hospitalization. CONCLUSION: These findings highlight the need to improve the correlation between in vitro susceptibility tests and clinical outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3634950
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36349502013-04-25 The minimal inhibitory concentration for sulbactam was not associated with the outcome of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter sp. treated with ampicillin/sulbactam de Oliveira, Maura S. Costa, Silvia Figueiredo de Pedri, Ewerton van der Heijden, Inneke Levin, Anna Sara S. Clinics (Sao Paulo) Rapid Communication OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the outcomes of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter infections treated with ampicillin/sulbactam were associated with the in vitro susceptibility profiles. METHODS: Twenty-two infections were treated with ampicillin/sulbactam. The median treatment duration was 14 days (range: 3-19 days), and the median daily dose was 9 g (range: 1.5-12 g). The median time between Acinetobacter isolation and treatment was 4 days (range: 0-11 days). RESULTS: The sulbactam minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) ranged from 2.0 to 32.0 mg/L, and the MIC was not associated with patient outcome, as 4 of 5 (80%) patients with a resistant infection (MIC≥16), 5 of 10 (50%) patients with intermediate isolates (MIC of 8) and only 1 of 7 (14%) patients with susceptible isolates (MIC ≤4) survived hospitalization. CONCLUSION: These findings highlight the need to improve the correlation between in vitro susceptibility tests and clinical outcome. Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo 2013-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3634950/ /pubmed/23778333 http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2013(04)21 Text en Copyright © 2013 Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Rapid Communication
de Oliveira, Maura S.
Costa, Silvia Figueiredo
de Pedri, Ewerton
van der Heijden, Inneke
Levin, Anna Sara S.
The minimal inhibitory concentration for sulbactam was not associated with the outcome of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter sp. treated with ampicillin/sulbactam
title The minimal inhibitory concentration for sulbactam was not associated with the outcome of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter sp. treated with ampicillin/sulbactam
title_full The minimal inhibitory concentration for sulbactam was not associated with the outcome of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter sp. treated with ampicillin/sulbactam
title_fullStr The minimal inhibitory concentration for sulbactam was not associated with the outcome of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter sp. treated with ampicillin/sulbactam
title_full_unstemmed The minimal inhibitory concentration for sulbactam was not associated with the outcome of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter sp. treated with ampicillin/sulbactam
title_short The minimal inhibitory concentration for sulbactam was not associated with the outcome of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter sp. treated with ampicillin/sulbactam
title_sort minimal inhibitory concentration for sulbactam was not associated with the outcome of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant acinetobacter sp. treated with ampicillin/sulbactam
topic Rapid Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3634950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23778333
http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2013(04)21
work_keys_str_mv AT deoliveiramauras theminimalinhibitoryconcentrationforsulbactamwasnotassociatedwiththeoutcomeofinfectionscausedbycarbapenemresistantacinetobactersptreatedwithampicillinsulbactam
AT costasilviafigueiredo theminimalinhibitoryconcentrationforsulbactamwasnotassociatedwiththeoutcomeofinfectionscausedbycarbapenemresistantacinetobactersptreatedwithampicillinsulbactam
AT depedriewerton theminimalinhibitoryconcentrationforsulbactamwasnotassociatedwiththeoutcomeofinfectionscausedbycarbapenemresistantacinetobactersptreatedwithampicillinsulbactam
AT vanderheijdeninneke theminimalinhibitoryconcentrationforsulbactamwasnotassociatedwiththeoutcomeofinfectionscausedbycarbapenemresistantacinetobactersptreatedwithampicillinsulbactam
AT levinannasaras theminimalinhibitoryconcentrationforsulbactamwasnotassociatedwiththeoutcomeofinfectionscausedbycarbapenemresistantacinetobactersptreatedwithampicillinsulbactam
AT deoliveiramauras minimalinhibitoryconcentrationforsulbactamwasnotassociatedwiththeoutcomeofinfectionscausedbycarbapenemresistantacinetobactersptreatedwithampicillinsulbactam
AT costasilviafigueiredo minimalinhibitoryconcentrationforsulbactamwasnotassociatedwiththeoutcomeofinfectionscausedbycarbapenemresistantacinetobactersptreatedwithampicillinsulbactam
AT depedriewerton minimalinhibitoryconcentrationforsulbactamwasnotassociatedwiththeoutcomeofinfectionscausedbycarbapenemresistantacinetobactersptreatedwithampicillinsulbactam
AT vanderheijdeninneke minimalinhibitoryconcentrationforsulbactamwasnotassociatedwiththeoutcomeofinfectionscausedbycarbapenemresistantacinetobactersptreatedwithampicillinsulbactam
AT levinannasaras minimalinhibitoryconcentrationforsulbactamwasnotassociatedwiththeoutcomeofinfectionscausedbycarbapenemresistantacinetobactersptreatedwithampicillinsulbactam