Cargando…

Protective response in renal transplantation: no clinical or molecular differences between open and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy

OBJECTIVE: Prolonged warm ischemia time and increased intra-abdominal pressure caused by pneumoperitoneum during a laparoscopic donor nephrectomy could enhance renal ischemia reperfusion injury. For this reason, laparoscopic donor nephrectomy may be associated with a slower graft function recovery....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Machado, Christiano, Malheiros, Denise Maria Avancini Costa, Adamy, Ari, Santos, Luiz Sergio, da Silva Filho, Agenor Ferreira, Nahas, William Carlos, Lemos, Francine Brambate Carvalhinho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3634954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23778338
http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2013(04)08
_version_ 1782267169458880512
author Machado, Christiano
Malheiros, Denise Maria Avancini Costa
Adamy, Ari
Santos, Luiz Sergio
da Silva Filho, Agenor Ferreira
Nahas, William Carlos
Lemos, Francine Brambate Carvalhinho
author_facet Machado, Christiano
Malheiros, Denise Maria Avancini Costa
Adamy, Ari
Santos, Luiz Sergio
da Silva Filho, Agenor Ferreira
Nahas, William Carlos
Lemos, Francine Brambate Carvalhinho
author_sort Machado, Christiano
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Prolonged warm ischemia time and increased intra-abdominal pressure caused by pneumoperitoneum during a laparoscopic donor nephrectomy could enhance renal ischemia reperfusion injury. For this reason, laparoscopic donor nephrectomy may be associated with a slower graft function recovery. However, an adequate protective response may balance the ischemia reperfusion damage. This study investigated whether laparoscopic donor nephrectomy modified the protective response of renal tissue during kidney transplantation. METHODS: Patients undergoing live renal transplantation were prospectively analyzed and divided into two groups based on the donor nephrectomy approach used: 1) the control group, recipients of open donor nephrectomy (n = 29), and 2) the study group, recipients of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (n = 26). Graft biopsies were obtained at two time points: T-1 = after warm ischemia time and T+1 = 45 minutes after kidney reperfusion. The samples were analyzed by immunohistochemistry for the Bcl-2 and HO-1 proteins and by real-time polymerase chain reaction for the mRNA expression of Bcl-2, HO-1 and vascular endothelial growth factor. RESULTS: The area under the curve for creatinine and delayed graft function were similar in both the laparoscopic and open groups. There was no difference in the protective gene expression between the laparoscopic donor nephrectomy and open donor nephrectomy groups. The protein expression of HO-1 and Bcl-2 were similar between the open and laparoscopic groups. Furthermore, the gene expression of B-cell lymphoma 2 correlated with the warm ischemia time in the open group (p = 0.047) and that of vascular endothelial growth factor with the area under the curve for creatinine in the laparoscopic group (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: The postoperative renal function and protective factor expression were similar between laparoscopic donor nephrectomy and open donor nephrectomy. These findings ensure laparoscopic donor nephrectomy utilization in renal transplantation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3634954
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36349542013-04-25 Protective response in renal transplantation: no clinical or molecular differences between open and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy Machado, Christiano Malheiros, Denise Maria Avancini Costa Adamy, Ari Santos, Luiz Sergio da Silva Filho, Agenor Ferreira Nahas, William Carlos Lemos, Francine Brambate Carvalhinho Clinics (Sao Paulo) Clinical Science OBJECTIVE: Prolonged warm ischemia time and increased intra-abdominal pressure caused by pneumoperitoneum during a laparoscopic donor nephrectomy could enhance renal ischemia reperfusion injury. For this reason, laparoscopic donor nephrectomy may be associated with a slower graft function recovery. However, an adequate protective response may balance the ischemia reperfusion damage. This study investigated whether laparoscopic donor nephrectomy modified the protective response of renal tissue during kidney transplantation. METHODS: Patients undergoing live renal transplantation were prospectively analyzed and divided into two groups based on the donor nephrectomy approach used: 1) the control group, recipients of open donor nephrectomy (n = 29), and 2) the study group, recipients of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (n = 26). Graft biopsies were obtained at two time points: T-1 = after warm ischemia time and T+1 = 45 minutes after kidney reperfusion. The samples were analyzed by immunohistochemistry for the Bcl-2 and HO-1 proteins and by real-time polymerase chain reaction for the mRNA expression of Bcl-2, HO-1 and vascular endothelial growth factor. RESULTS: The area under the curve for creatinine and delayed graft function were similar in both the laparoscopic and open groups. There was no difference in the protective gene expression between the laparoscopic donor nephrectomy and open donor nephrectomy groups. The protein expression of HO-1 and Bcl-2 were similar between the open and laparoscopic groups. Furthermore, the gene expression of B-cell lymphoma 2 correlated with the warm ischemia time in the open group (p = 0.047) and that of vascular endothelial growth factor with the area under the curve for creatinine in the laparoscopic group (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: The postoperative renal function and protective factor expression were similar between laparoscopic donor nephrectomy and open donor nephrectomy. These findings ensure laparoscopic donor nephrectomy utilization in renal transplantation. Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo 2013-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3634954/ /pubmed/23778338 http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2013(04)08 Text en Copyright © 2013 Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Science
Machado, Christiano
Malheiros, Denise Maria Avancini Costa
Adamy, Ari
Santos, Luiz Sergio
da Silva Filho, Agenor Ferreira
Nahas, William Carlos
Lemos, Francine Brambate Carvalhinho
Protective response in renal transplantation: no clinical or molecular differences between open and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy
title Protective response in renal transplantation: no clinical or molecular differences between open and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy
title_full Protective response in renal transplantation: no clinical or molecular differences between open and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy
title_fullStr Protective response in renal transplantation: no clinical or molecular differences between open and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy
title_full_unstemmed Protective response in renal transplantation: no clinical or molecular differences between open and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy
title_short Protective response in renal transplantation: no clinical or molecular differences between open and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy
title_sort protective response in renal transplantation: no clinical or molecular differences between open and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy
topic Clinical Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3634954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23778338
http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2013(04)08
work_keys_str_mv AT machadochristiano protectiveresponseinrenaltransplantationnoclinicalormoleculardifferencesbetweenopenandlaparoscopicdonornephrectomy
AT malheirosdenisemariaavancinicosta protectiveresponseinrenaltransplantationnoclinicalormoleculardifferencesbetweenopenandlaparoscopicdonornephrectomy
AT adamyari protectiveresponseinrenaltransplantationnoclinicalormoleculardifferencesbetweenopenandlaparoscopicdonornephrectomy
AT santosluizsergio protectiveresponseinrenaltransplantationnoclinicalormoleculardifferencesbetweenopenandlaparoscopicdonornephrectomy
AT dasilvafilhoagenorferreira protectiveresponseinrenaltransplantationnoclinicalormoleculardifferencesbetweenopenandlaparoscopicdonornephrectomy
AT nahaswilliamcarlos protectiveresponseinrenaltransplantationnoclinicalormoleculardifferencesbetweenopenandlaparoscopicdonornephrectomy
AT lemosfrancinebrambatecarvalhinho protectiveresponseinrenaltransplantationnoclinicalormoleculardifferencesbetweenopenandlaparoscopicdonornephrectomy