Cargando…
Protective response in renal transplantation: no clinical or molecular differences between open and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy
OBJECTIVE: Prolonged warm ischemia time and increased intra-abdominal pressure caused by pneumoperitoneum during a laparoscopic donor nephrectomy could enhance renal ischemia reperfusion injury. For this reason, laparoscopic donor nephrectomy may be associated with a slower graft function recovery....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3634954/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23778338 http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2013(04)08 |
_version_ | 1782267169458880512 |
---|---|
author | Machado, Christiano Malheiros, Denise Maria Avancini Costa Adamy, Ari Santos, Luiz Sergio da Silva Filho, Agenor Ferreira Nahas, William Carlos Lemos, Francine Brambate Carvalhinho |
author_facet | Machado, Christiano Malheiros, Denise Maria Avancini Costa Adamy, Ari Santos, Luiz Sergio da Silva Filho, Agenor Ferreira Nahas, William Carlos Lemos, Francine Brambate Carvalhinho |
author_sort | Machado, Christiano |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Prolonged warm ischemia time and increased intra-abdominal pressure caused by pneumoperitoneum during a laparoscopic donor nephrectomy could enhance renal ischemia reperfusion injury. For this reason, laparoscopic donor nephrectomy may be associated with a slower graft function recovery. However, an adequate protective response may balance the ischemia reperfusion damage. This study investigated whether laparoscopic donor nephrectomy modified the protective response of renal tissue during kidney transplantation. METHODS: Patients undergoing live renal transplantation were prospectively analyzed and divided into two groups based on the donor nephrectomy approach used: 1) the control group, recipients of open donor nephrectomy (n = 29), and 2) the study group, recipients of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (n = 26). Graft biopsies were obtained at two time points: T-1 = after warm ischemia time and T+1 = 45 minutes after kidney reperfusion. The samples were analyzed by immunohistochemistry for the Bcl-2 and HO-1 proteins and by real-time polymerase chain reaction for the mRNA expression of Bcl-2, HO-1 and vascular endothelial growth factor. RESULTS: The area under the curve for creatinine and delayed graft function were similar in both the laparoscopic and open groups. There was no difference in the protective gene expression between the laparoscopic donor nephrectomy and open donor nephrectomy groups. The protein expression of HO-1 and Bcl-2 were similar between the open and laparoscopic groups. Furthermore, the gene expression of B-cell lymphoma 2 correlated with the warm ischemia time in the open group (p = 0.047) and that of vascular endothelial growth factor with the area under the curve for creatinine in the laparoscopic group (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: The postoperative renal function and protective factor expression were similar between laparoscopic donor nephrectomy and open donor nephrectomy. These findings ensure laparoscopic donor nephrectomy utilization in renal transplantation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3634954 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36349542013-04-25 Protective response in renal transplantation: no clinical or molecular differences between open and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy Machado, Christiano Malheiros, Denise Maria Avancini Costa Adamy, Ari Santos, Luiz Sergio da Silva Filho, Agenor Ferreira Nahas, William Carlos Lemos, Francine Brambate Carvalhinho Clinics (Sao Paulo) Clinical Science OBJECTIVE: Prolonged warm ischemia time and increased intra-abdominal pressure caused by pneumoperitoneum during a laparoscopic donor nephrectomy could enhance renal ischemia reperfusion injury. For this reason, laparoscopic donor nephrectomy may be associated with a slower graft function recovery. However, an adequate protective response may balance the ischemia reperfusion damage. This study investigated whether laparoscopic donor nephrectomy modified the protective response of renal tissue during kidney transplantation. METHODS: Patients undergoing live renal transplantation were prospectively analyzed and divided into two groups based on the donor nephrectomy approach used: 1) the control group, recipients of open donor nephrectomy (n = 29), and 2) the study group, recipients of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (n = 26). Graft biopsies were obtained at two time points: T-1 = after warm ischemia time and T+1 = 45 minutes after kidney reperfusion. The samples were analyzed by immunohistochemistry for the Bcl-2 and HO-1 proteins and by real-time polymerase chain reaction for the mRNA expression of Bcl-2, HO-1 and vascular endothelial growth factor. RESULTS: The area under the curve for creatinine and delayed graft function were similar in both the laparoscopic and open groups. There was no difference in the protective gene expression between the laparoscopic donor nephrectomy and open donor nephrectomy groups. The protein expression of HO-1 and Bcl-2 were similar between the open and laparoscopic groups. Furthermore, the gene expression of B-cell lymphoma 2 correlated with the warm ischemia time in the open group (p = 0.047) and that of vascular endothelial growth factor with the area under the curve for creatinine in the laparoscopic group (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: The postoperative renal function and protective factor expression were similar between laparoscopic donor nephrectomy and open donor nephrectomy. These findings ensure laparoscopic donor nephrectomy utilization in renal transplantation. Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo 2013-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3634954/ /pubmed/23778338 http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2013(04)08 Text en Copyright © 2013 Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Science Machado, Christiano Malheiros, Denise Maria Avancini Costa Adamy, Ari Santos, Luiz Sergio da Silva Filho, Agenor Ferreira Nahas, William Carlos Lemos, Francine Brambate Carvalhinho Protective response in renal transplantation: no clinical or molecular differences between open and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy |
title | Protective response in renal transplantation: no clinical or molecular differences between open and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy |
title_full | Protective response in renal transplantation: no clinical or molecular differences between open and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy |
title_fullStr | Protective response in renal transplantation: no clinical or molecular differences between open and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Protective response in renal transplantation: no clinical or molecular differences between open and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy |
title_short | Protective response in renal transplantation: no clinical or molecular differences between open and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy |
title_sort | protective response in renal transplantation: no clinical or molecular differences between open and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy |
topic | Clinical Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3634954/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23778338 http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2013(04)08 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT machadochristiano protectiveresponseinrenaltransplantationnoclinicalormoleculardifferencesbetweenopenandlaparoscopicdonornephrectomy AT malheirosdenisemariaavancinicosta protectiveresponseinrenaltransplantationnoclinicalormoleculardifferencesbetweenopenandlaparoscopicdonornephrectomy AT adamyari protectiveresponseinrenaltransplantationnoclinicalormoleculardifferencesbetweenopenandlaparoscopicdonornephrectomy AT santosluizsergio protectiveresponseinrenaltransplantationnoclinicalormoleculardifferencesbetweenopenandlaparoscopicdonornephrectomy AT dasilvafilhoagenorferreira protectiveresponseinrenaltransplantationnoclinicalormoleculardifferencesbetweenopenandlaparoscopicdonornephrectomy AT nahaswilliamcarlos protectiveresponseinrenaltransplantationnoclinicalormoleculardifferencesbetweenopenandlaparoscopicdonornephrectomy AT lemosfrancinebrambatecarvalhinho protectiveresponseinrenaltransplantationnoclinicalormoleculardifferencesbetweenopenandlaparoscopicdonornephrectomy |