Cargando…
Barriers to and facilitators for screening women for intimate partner violence in surgical fracture clinics: a qualitative descriptive approach
BACKGROUND: Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) is a major health issue that involves any physical, sexual or psychological harm inflicted by a current or former partner. Musculoskeletal injuries represent the second most prevalent clinical manifestation of IPV. Health care professionals, however, rarel...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3635968/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23560744 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-14-122 |
_version_ | 1782267246588985344 |
---|---|
author | Sprague, Sheila Swinton, Marilyn Madden, Kim Swaleh, Rukia Goslings, J Carel Petrisor, Brad Bhandari, Mohit |
author_facet | Sprague, Sheila Swinton, Marilyn Madden, Kim Swaleh, Rukia Goslings, J Carel Petrisor, Brad Bhandari, Mohit |
author_sort | Sprague, Sheila |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) is a major health issue that involves any physical, sexual or psychological harm inflicted by a current or former partner. Musculoskeletal injuries represent the second most prevalent clinical manifestation of IPV. Health care professionals, however, rarely screen women for IPV. Using qualitative methods, this study aimed to explore the perceived barriers to IPV screening and potential facilitators for overcoming these barriers among orthopaedic surgeons and surgical trainees. METHODS: We conducted three focus groups with orthopaedic surgeons, senior surgical trainees, and junior surgical trainees. A semi-structured focus group guide was used to structure the discussions. Transcripts and field notes from the focus groups were analyzed using the qualitative software program N’Vivo (version 10.0; QSR International, Melbourne, Australia). To further inform our focus group findings and discuss policy changes, we conducted interviews with two opinion leaders in the field of orthopaedics. Similar to the focus groups, the interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed, and then analyzed. RESULTS: In the analysis, four categories of barriers were identified: surgeon perception barriers; perceived patient barriers; fracture clinic barriers and orthopaedic health care professional barriers. Some of the facilitators identified included availability of a crisis team; development of a screening form; presence of IPV posters or buttons in the fracture clinic; and the need for established policy or government support for IPV screening. The interviewees identified the need for: the introduction of evidence-based policy aiming to increase awareness about IPV among health care professionals working within the fracture clinic setting, fostering local and national champions for IPV screening, and the need to generate change on a local level. CONCLUSIONS: There are a number of perceived barriers to screening women in the fracture clinic for IPV, many of which can be addressed through increased education and training, and additional resources in the fracture clinic. Orthopaedic health care professionals are supportive of implementing an IPV screening program in the orthopaedic fracture clinic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3635968 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36359682013-04-26 Barriers to and facilitators for screening women for intimate partner violence in surgical fracture clinics: a qualitative descriptive approach Sprague, Sheila Swinton, Marilyn Madden, Kim Swaleh, Rukia Goslings, J Carel Petrisor, Brad Bhandari, Mohit BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) is a major health issue that involves any physical, sexual or psychological harm inflicted by a current or former partner. Musculoskeletal injuries represent the second most prevalent clinical manifestation of IPV. Health care professionals, however, rarely screen women for IPV. Using qualitative methods, this study aimed to explore the perceived barriers to IPV screening and potential facilitators for overcoming these barriers among orthopaedic surgeons and surgical trainees. METHODS: We conducted three focus groups with orthopaedic surgeons, senior surgical trainees, and junior surgical trainees. A semi-structured focus group guide was used to structure the discussions. Transcripts and field notes from the focus groups were analyzed using the qualitative software program N’Vivo (version 10.0; QSR International, Melbourne, Australia). To further inform our focus group findings and discuss policy changes, we conducted interviews with two opinion leaders in the field of orthopaedics. Similar to the focus groups, the interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed, and then analyzed. RESULTS: In the analysis, four categories of barriers were identified: surgeon perception barriers; perceived patient barriers; fracture clinic barriers and orthopaedic health care professional barriers. Some of the facilitators identified included availability of a crisis team; development of a screening form; presence of IPV posters or buttons in the fracture clinic; and the need for established policy or government support for IPV screening. The interviewees identified the need for: the introduction of evidence-based policy aiming to increase awareness about IPV among health care professionals working within the fracture clinic setting, fostering local and national champions for IPV screening, and the need to generate change on a local level. CONCLUSIONS: There are a number of perceived barriers to screening women in the fracture clinic for IPV, many of which can be addressed through increased education and training, and additional resources in the fracture clinic. Orthopaedic health care professionals are supportive of implementing an IPV screening program in the orthopaedic fracture clinic. BioMed Central 2013-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3635968/ /pubmed/23560744 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-14-122 Text en Copyright © 2013 Sprague et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Sprague, Sheila Swinton, Marilyn Madden, Kim Swaleh, Rukia Goslings, J Carel Petrisor, Brad Bhandari, Mohit Barriers to and facilitators for screening women for intimate partner violence in surgical fracture clinics: a qualitative descriptive approach |
title | Barriers to and facilitators for screening women for intimate partner violence in surgical fracture clinics: a qualitative descriptive approach |
title_full | Barriers to and facilitators for screening women for intimate partner violence in surgical fracture clinics: a qualitative descriptive approach |
title_fullStr | Barriers to and facilitators for screening women for intimate partner violence in surgical fracture clinics: a qualitative descriptive approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Barriers to and facilitators for screening women for intimate partner violence in surgical fracture clinics: a qualitative descriptive approach |
title_short | Barriers to and facilitators for screening women for intimate partner violence in surgical fracture clinics: a qualitative descriptive approach |
title_sort | barriers to and facilitators for screening women for intimate partner violence in surgical fracture clinics: a qualitative descriptive approach |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3635968/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23560744 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-14-122 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT spraguesheila barrierstoandfacilitatorsforscreeningwomenforintimatepartnerviolenceinsurgicalfractureclinicsaqualitativedescriptiveapproach AT swintonmarilyn barrierstoandfacilitatorsforscreeningwomenforintimatepartnerviolenceinsurgicalfractureclinicsaqualitativedescriptiveapproach AT maddenkim barrierstoandfacilitatorsforscreeningwomenforintimatepartnerviolenceinsurgicalfractureclinicsaqualitativedescriptiveapproach AT swalehrukia barrierstoandfacilitatorsforscreeningwomenforintimatepartnerviolenceinsurgicalfractureclinicsaqualitativedescriptiveapproach AT goslingsjcarel barrierstoandfacilitatorsforscreeningwomenforintimatepartnerviolenceinsurgicalfractureclinicsaqualitativedescriptiveapproach AT petrisorbrad barrierstoandfacilitatorsforscreeningwomenforintimatepartnerviolenceinsurgicalfractureclinicsaqualitativedescriptiveapproach AT bhandarimohit barrierstoandfacilitatorsforscreeningwomenforintimatepartnerviolenceinsurgicalfractureclinicsaqualitativedescriptiveapproach |