Cargando…

Gender differences in the use of insecticide-treated nets after a universal free distribution campaign in Kano State, Nigeria: post-campaign survey results

BACKGROUND: Recent expansion in insecticide-treated net (ITN) distribution strategies range from targeting pregnant women and children under five and distributing ITN at antenatal care and immunization programmes, to providing free distribution campaigns to cover an entire population. These changes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garley, Ashley E, Ivanovich, Elizabeth, Eckert, Erin, Negroustoueva, Svetlana, Ye, Yazoume
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3635971/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23574987
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-12-119
_version_ 1782267247290482688
author Garley, Ashley E
Ivanovich, Elizabeth
Eckert, Erin
Negroustoueva, Svetlana
Ye, Yazoume
author_facet Garley, Ashley E
Ivanovich, Elizabeth
Eckert, Erin
Negroustoueva, Svetlana
Ye, Yazoume
author_sort Garley, Ashley E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recent expansion in insecticide-treated net (ITN) distribution strategies range from targeting pregnant women and children under five and distributing ITN at antenatal care and immunization programmes, to providing free distribution campaigns to cover an entire population. These changes in strategy raise issues of disparities, such as equity of access and equality in ITN use among different groups, including females and males. Analysis is needed to assess the effects of gender on uptake of key malaria control interventions. A recent post-universal free ITN distribution campaign survey in Kano State, Nigeria offered an opportunity to look at gender effects on ITN use. METHODS: A post-campaign survey was conducted three to five months after the campaign in Kano State, Nigeria from 19 October to 4 November, 2009, on a random sample of 4,602 individuals. The survey was carried out using a questionnaire adapted from the Malaria Indicator Survey. Using binary logistic regression, controlling for several covariates, the authors assessed gender effects on ITN use among individuals living in households with at least one ITN. RESULTS: The survey showed that household ITN ownership increased more than 10-fold, from 6% before to 71% after the campaign. There was no significant difference between the proportion of females and males living in households with at least one ITN. However, a higher percentage of females used ITNs compared to males (57.2% vs 48.8%). After controlling for several covariates, females remained more likely to use ITNs compared to males (OR: 1.5, 95% CI: 1.3-1.7). Adolescent boys remained the least likely group to use an ITN. CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals gender disparity in ITN use, with males less likely to use ITNs particularly among ages 15–25 years. The uptake of the intervention among the most at-risk group (females) is higher than males, which may be reflective of earlier strategies for malaria interventions. Further research is needed to identify whether gender disparities in ITN use are related to traditional targeting of pregnant women and children with malaria interventions; however, results provide evidence to design gender-sensitive messaging for universal ITN distribution campaigns to ensure that males benefit equally from such communications and activities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3635971
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36359712013-04-26 Gender differences in the use of insecticide-treated nets after a universal free distribution campaign in Kano State, Nigeria: post-campaign survey results Garley, Ashley E Ivanovich, Elizabeth Eckert, Erin Negroustoueva, Svetlana Ye, Yazoume Malar J Research BACKGROUND: Recent expansion in insecticide-treated net (ITN) distribution strategies range from targeting pregnant women and children under five and distributing ITN at antenatal care and immunization programmes, to providing free distribution campaigns to cover an entire population. These changes in strategy raise issues of disparities, such as equity of access and equality in ITN use among different groups, including females and males. Analysis is needed to assess the effects of gender on uptake of key malaria control interventions. A recent post-universal free ITN distribution campaign survey in Kano State, Nigeria offered an opportunity to look at gender effects on ITN use. METHODS: A post-campaign survey was conducted three to five months after the campaign in Kano State, Nigeria from 19 October to 4 November, 2009, on a random sample of 4,602 individuals. The survey was carried out using a questionnaire adapted from the Malaria Indicator Survey. Using binary logistic regression, controlling for several covariates, the authors assessed gender effects on ITN use among individuals living in households with at least one ITN. RESULTS: The survey showed that household ITN ownership increased more than 10-fold, from 6% before to 71% after the campaign. There was no significant difference between the proportion of females and males living in households with at least one ITN. However, a higher percentage of females used ITNs compared to males (57.2% vs 48.8%). After controlling for several covariates, females remained more likely to use ITNs compared to males (OR: 1.5, 95% CI: 1.3-1.7). Adolescent boys remained the least likely group to use an ITN. CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals gender disparity in ITN use, with males less likely to use ITNs particularly among ages 15–25 years. The uptake of the intervention among the most at-risk group (females) is higher than males, which may be reflective of earlier strategies for malaria interventions. Further research is needed to identify whether gender disparities in ITN use are related to traditional targeting of pregnant women and children with malaria interventions; however, results provide evidence to design gender-sensitive messaging for universal ITN distribution campaigns to ensure that males benefit equally from such communications and activities. BioMed Central 2013-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3635971/ /pubmed/23574987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-12-119 Text en Copyright © 2013 Garley et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Garley, Ashley E
Ivanovich, Elizabeth
Eckert, Erin
Negroustoueva, Svetlana
Ye, Yazoume
Gender differences in the use of insecticide-treated nets after a universal free distribution campaign in Kano State, Nigeria: post-campaign survey results
title Gender differences in the use of insecticide-treated nets after a universal free distribution campaign in Kano State, Nigeria: post-campaign survey results
title_full Gender differences in the use of insecticide-treated nets after a universal free distribution campaign in Kano State, Nigeria: post-campaign survey results
title_fullStr Gender differences in the use of insecticide-treated nets after a universal free distribution campaign in Kano State, Nigeria: post-campaign survey results
title_full_unstemmed Gender differences in the use of insecticide-treated nets after a universal free distribution campaign in Kano State, Nigeria: post-campaign survey results
title_short Gender differences in the use of insecticide-treated nets after a universal free distribution campaign in Kano State, Nigeria: post-campaign survey results
title_sort gender differences in the use of insecticide-treated nets after a universal free distribution campaign in kano state, nigeria: post-campaign survey results
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3635971/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23574987
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-12-119
work_keys_str_mv AT garleyashleye genderdifferencesintheuseofinsecticidetreatednetsafterauniversalfreedistributioncampaigninkanostatenigeriapostcampaignsurveyresults
AT ivanovichelizabeth genderdifferencesintheuseofinsecticidetreatednetsafterauniversalfreedistributioncampaigninkanostatenigeriapostcampaignsurveyresults
AT eckerterin genderdifferencesintheuseofinsecticidetreatednetsafterauniversalfreedistributioncampaigninkanostatenigeriapostcampaignsurveyresults
AT negroustouevasvetlana genderdifferencesintheuseofinsecticidetreatednetsafterauniversalfreedistributioncampaigninkanostatenigeriapostcampaignsurveyresults
AT yeyazoume genderdifferencesintheuseofinsecticidetreatednetsafterauniversalfreedistributioncampaigninkanostatenigeriapostcampaignsurveyresults