Cargando…
Radionuclide Transport and Uptake in Coastal Aquatic Ecosystems: A Comparison of a 3D Dynamic Model and a Compartment Model
In safety assessments of underground radioactive waste repositories, understanding radionuclide fate in ecosystems is necessary to determine the impacts of potential releases. Here, the reliability of two mechanistic models (the compartmental K-model and the 3D dynamic D-model) in describing the fat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3636370/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23619804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-013-0398-2 |
_version_ | 1782267322366427136 |
---|---|
author | Erichsen, Anders Christian Konovalenko, Lena Møhlenberg, Flemming Closter, Rikke Margrethe Bradshaw, Clare Aquilonius, Karin Kautsky, Ulrik |
author_facet | Erichsen, Anders Christian Konovalenko, Lena Møhlenberg, Flemming Closter, Rikke Margrethe Bradshaw, Clare Aquilonius, Karin Kautsky, Ulrik |
author_sort | Erichsen, Anders Christian |
collection | PubMed |
description | In safety assessments of underground radioactive waste repositories, understanding radionuclide fate in ecosystems is necessary to determine the impacts of potential releases. Here, the reliability of two mechanistic models (the compartmental K-model and the 3D dynamic D-model) in describing the fate of radionuclides released into a Baltic Sea bay is tested. Both are based on ecosystem models that simulate the cycling of organic matter (carbon). Radionuclide transfer is linked to adsorption and flows of carbon in food chains. Accumulation of Th-230, Cs-135, and Ni-59 in biological compartments was comparable between the models and site measurements despite differences in temporal resolution, biological state variables, and partition coefficients. Both models provided confidence limits for their modeled concentration ratios, an improvement over models that only estimate means. The D-model enables estimates at high spatio-temporal resolution. The K-model, being coarser but faster, allows estimates centuries ahead. Future developments could integrate the two models to take advantage of their respective strengths. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13280-013-0398-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3636370 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36363702013-04-29 Radionuclide Transport and Uptake in Coastal Aquatic Ecosystems: A Comparison of a 3D Dynamic Model and a Compartment Model Erichsen, Anders Christian Konovalenko, Lena Møhlenberg, Flemming Closter, Rikke Margrethe Bradshaw, Clare Aquilonius, Karin Kautsky, Ulrik Ambio Article In safety assessments of underground radioactive waste repositories, understanding radionuclide fate in ecosystems is necessary to determine the impacts of potential releases. Here, the reliability of two mechanistic models (the compartmental K-model and the 3D dynamic D-model) in describing the fate of radionuclides released into a Baltic Sea bay is tested. Both are based on ecosystem models that simulate the cycling of organic matter (carbon). Radionuclide transfer is linked to adsorption and flows of carbon in food chains. Accumulation of Th-230, Cs-135, and Ni-59 in biological compartments was comparable between the models and site measurements despite differences in temporal resolution, biological state variables, and partition coefficients. Both models provided confidence limits for their modeled concentration ratios, an improvement over models that only estimate means. The D-model enables estimates at high spatio-temporal resolution. The K-model, being coarser but faster, allows estimates centuries ahead. Future developments could integrate the two models to take advantage of their respective strengths. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13280-013-0398-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Netherlands 2013-04-26 2013-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3636370/ /pubmed/23619804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-013-0398-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Article Erichsen, Anders Christian Konovalenko, Lena Møhlenberg, Flemming Closter, Rikke Margrethe Bradshaw, Clare Aquilonius, Karin Kautsky, Ulrik Radionuclide Transport and Uptake in Coastal Aquatic Ecosystems: A Comparison of a 3D Dynamic Model and a Compartment Model |
title | Radionuclide Transport and Uptake in Coastal Aquatic Ecosystems: A Comparison of a 3D Dynamic Model and a Compartment Model |
title_full | Radionuclide Transport and Uptake in Coastal Aquatic Ecosystems: A Comparison of a 3D Dynamic Model and a Compartment Model |
title_fullStr | Radionuclide Transport and Uptake in Coastal Aquatic Ecosystems: A Comparison of a 3D Dynamic Model and a Compartment Model |
title_full_unstemmed | Radionuclide Transport and Uptake in Coastal Aquatic Ecosystems: A Comparison of a 3D Dynamic Model and a Compartment Model |
title_short | Radionuclide Transport and Uptake in Coastal Aquatic Ecosystems: A Comparison of a 3D Dynamic Model and a Compartment Model |
title_sort | radionuclide transport and uptake in coastal aquatic ecosystems: a comparison of a 3d dynamic model and a compartment model |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3636370/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23619804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-013-0398-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT erichsenanderschristian radionuclidetransportanduptakeincoastalaquaticecosystemsacomparisonofa3ddynamicmodelandacompartmentmodel AT konovalenkolena radionuclidetransportanduptakeincoastalaquaticecosystemsacomparisonofa3ddynamicmodelandacompartmentmodel AT møhlenbergflemming radionuclidetransportanduptakeincoastalaquaticecosystemsacomparisonofa3ddynamicmodelandacompartmentmodel AT closterrikkemargrethe radionuclidetransportanduptakeincoastalaquaticecosystemsacomparisonofa3ddynamicmodelandacompartmentmodel AT bradshawclare radionuclidetransportanduptakeincoastalaquaticecosystemsacomparisonofa3ddynamicmodelandacompartmentmodel AT aquiloniuskarin radionuclidetransportanduptakeincoastalaquaticecosystemsacomparisonofa3ddynamicmodelandacompartmentmodel AT kautskyulrik radionuclidetransportanduptakeincoastalaquaticecosystemsacomparisonofa3ddynamicmodelandacompartmentmodel |