Cargando…

Implementation of misoprostol for postabortion care in Kenya and Uganda: a qualitative evaluation

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate implementation of misoprostol for postabortion care (MPAC) in two African countries. DESIGN: Qualitative, program evaluation. SETTING: Twenty-five public and private health facilities in Rift Valley Province, Kenya, and Kampala Province, Uganda. SAMPLE: Forty-five MPAC providers,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Osur, Joachim, Baird, Traci L., Levandowski, Brooke A., Jackson, Emily, Murokora, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Co-Action Publishing 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3636418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23618341
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v6i0.19649
_version_ 1782267326701240320
author Osur, Joachim
Baird, Traci L.
Levandowski, Brooke A.
Jackson, Emily
Murokora, Daniel
author_facet Osur, Joachim
Baird, Traci L.
Levandowski, Brooke A.
Jackson, Emily
Murokora, Daniel
author_sort Osur, Joachim
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Evaluate implementation of misoprostol for postabortion care (MPAC) in two African countries. DESIGN: Qualitative, program evaluation. SETTING: Twenty-five public and private health facilities in Rift Valley Province, Kenya, and Kampala Province, Uganda. SAMPLE: Forty-five MPAC providers, health facility managers, Ministry of Health officials, and non-governmental (NGO) staff involved in program implementation. METHODS AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: In both countries, the Ministry of Health, local health centers and hospitals, and NGO staff developed evidence-based service delivery protocols to introduce MPAC in selected facilities; implementation extended from January 2009 to October 2010. Semi-structured, in-depth interviews evaluated the implementation process, identified supportive and inhibitive policies for implementation, elicited lessons learned during the process, and assessed provider satisfaction and providers’ impressions of client satisfaction with MPAC. Project reports were also reviewed. RESULTS: In both countries, MPAC was easy to use, and freed up provider time and health facility resources traditionally necessary for provision of PAC with uterine aspiration. On-going support of providers following training ensured high quality of care. Providers perceived that many women preferred MPAC, as they avoided instrumentation of the uterus, hospital admission, cost, and stigma associated with abortion. Appropriate registration of misoprostol for use in the pilot, and maintaining supplies of misoprostol, were significant challenges to service provision. Support from the Ministry of Health was necessary for successful implementation; lack of country-based standards and guidelines for MPAC created challenges. CONCLUSIONS: MPAC is simple, cost-effective and can be readily implemented in settings with high rates of abortion-related mortality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3636418
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Co-Action Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36364182013-04-26 Implementation of misoprostol for postabortion care in Kenya and Uganda: a qualitative evaluation Osur, Joachim Baird, Traci L. Levandowski, Brooke A. Jackson, Emily Murokora, Daniel Glob Health Action Original Article OBJECTIVE: Evaluate implementation of misoprostol for postabortion care (MPAC) in two African countries. DESIGN: Qualitative, program evaluation. SETTING: Twenty-five public and private health facilities in Rift Valley Province, Kenya, and Kampala Province, Uganda. SAMPLE: Forty-five MPAC providers, health facility managers, Ministry of Health officials, and non-governmental (NGO) staff involved in program implementation. METHODS AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: In both countries, the Ministry of Health, local health centers and hospitals, and NGO staff developed evidence-based service delivery protocols to introduce MPAC in selected facilities; implementation extended from January 2009 to October 2010. Semi-structured, in-depth interviews evaluated the implementation process, identified supportive and inhibitive policies for implementation, elicited lessons learned during the process, and assessed provider satisfaction and providers’ impressions of client satisfaction with MPAC. Project reports were also reviewed. RESULTS: In both countries, MPAC was easy to use, and freed up provider time and health facility resources traditionally necessary for provision of PAC with uterine aspiration. On-going support of providers following training ensured high quality of care. Providers perceived that many women preferred MPAC, as they avoided instrumentation of the uterus, hospital admission, cost, and stigma associated with abortion. Appropriate registration of misoprostol for use in the pilot, and maintaining supplies of misoprostol, were significant challenges to service provision. Support from the Ministry of Health was necessary for successful implementation; lack of country-based standards and guidelines for MPAC created challenges. CONCLUSIONS: MPAC is simple, cost-effective and can be readily implemented in settings with high rates of abortion-related mortality. Co-Action Publishing 2013-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3636418/ /pubmed/23618341 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v6i0.19649 Text en © 2013 Joachim Osur et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Osur, Joachim
Baird, Traci L.
Levandowski, Brooke A.
Jackson, Emily
Murokora, Daniel
Implementation of misoprostol for postabortion care in Kenya and Uganda: a qualitative evaluation
title Implementation of misoprostol for postabortion care in Kenya and Uganda: a qualitative evaluation
title_full Implementation of misoprostol for postabortion care in Kenya and Uganda: a qualitative evaluation
title_fullStr Implementation of misoprostol for postabortion care in Kenya and Uganda: a qualitative evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Implementation of misoprostol for postabortion care in Kenya and Uganda: a qualitative evaluation
title_short Implementation of misoprostol for postabortion care in Kenya and Uganda: a qualitative evaluation
title_sort implementation of misoprostol for postabortion care in kenya and uganda: a qualitative evaluation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3636418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23618341
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v6i0.19649
work_keys_str_mv AT osurjoachim implementationofmisoprostolforpostabortioncareinkenyaandugandaaqualitativeevaluation
AT bairdtracil implementationofmisoprostolforpostabortioncareinkenyaandugandaaqualitativeevaluation
AT levandowskibrookea implementationofmisoprostolforpostabortioncareinkenyaandugandaaqualitativeevaluation
AT jacksonemily implementationofmisoprostolforpostabortioncareinkenyaandugandaaqualitativeevaluation
AT murokoradaniel implementationofmisoprostolforpostabortioncareinkenyaandugandaaqualitativeevaluation