Cargando…

A comparative microbiological study to assess caries excavation by conventional rotary method and a chemo-mechanical method

AIMS: This study was aimed to determine the effectiveness of Papacárie(®) for caries removal as compared to the conventional method with respect to microbial flora, time, the amount of tissue removal, child's behavior, pain perception, and preference of treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anegundi, Rajesh T., Patil, Shruthi B., Tegginmani, Viresh, Shetty, Sheetal D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3636841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23633794
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.107420
_version_ 1782267374332805120
author Anegundi, Rajesh T.
Patil, Shruthi B.
Tegginmani, Viresh
Shetty, Sheetal D.
author_facet Anegundi, Rajesh T.
Patil, Shruthi B.
Tegginmani, Viresh
Shetty, Sheetal D.
author_sort Anegundi, Rajesh T.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: This study was aimed to determine the effectiveness of Papacárie(®) for caries removal as compared to the conventional method with respect to microbial flora, time, the amount of tissue removal, child's behavior, pain perception, and preference of treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty primary molars of 30 children of age 4-9 years were selected randomly and divided into two groups of 30 teeth each: Group A treated by conventional method and group B with Papacárie(®) method. RESULTS: Comparatively, no statistical difference was seen in microbial growth, total bacterial count, and lactobacilli count in both the groups (P = 0.36). The mean cavity entrance size with group A was 0.98133 mm and group B was 0.26083 mm (P < 0.001). The mean preparation time for group A was 4.7 Mins (minutes) and group B was 17.96 min s (P < 0.001). Majority of kids of both group A and B scored 3 (Frankl Behavior Rating Scale) before and after the treatment showing no statistical difference in their behavioral score (P = 1). In group A 50% of children experienced no pain as compared to 86.7% in group B (P = 0.01). There was no statistical difference in the preference of treatment (P = 0.12). CONCLUSION: Thus, the Chemo mechanical caries removal method can be considered as an effective method to control pain and preserve sound tooth structure during caries excavation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3636841
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36368412013-04-30 A comparative microbiological study to assess caries excavation by conventional rotary method and a chemo-mechanical method Anegundi, Rajesh T. Patil, Shruthi B. Tegginmani, Viresh Shetty, Sheetal D. Contemp Clin Dent Original Article AIMS: This study was aimed to determine the effectiveness of Papacárie(®) for caries removal as compared to the conventional method with respect to microbial flora, time, the amount of tissue removal, child's behavior, pain perception, and preference of treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty primary molars of 30 children of age 4-9 years were selected randomly and divided into two groups of 30 teeth each: Group A treated by conventional method and group B with Papacárie(®) method. RESULTS: Comparatively, no statistical difference was seen in microbial growth, total bacterial count, and lactobacilli count in both the groups (P = 0.36). The mean cavity entrance size with group A was 0.98133 mm and group B was 0.26083 mm (P < 0.001). The mean preparation time for group A was 4.7 Mins (minutes) and group B was 17.96 min s (P < 0.001). Majority of kids of both group A and B scored 3 (Frankl Behavior Rating Scale) before and after the treatment showing no statistical difference in their behavioral score (P = 1). In group A 50% of children experienced no pain as compared to 86.7% in group B (P = 0.01). There was no statistical difference in the preference of treatment (P = 0.12). CONCLUSION: Thus, the Chemo mechanical caries removal method can be considered as an effective method to control pain and preserve sound tooth structure during caries excavation. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3636841/ /pubmed/23633794 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.107420 Text en Copyright: © Contemporary Clinical Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Anegundi, Rajesh T.
Patil, Shruthi B.
Tegginmani, Viresh
Shetty, Sheetal D.
A comparative microbiological study to assess caries excavation by conventional rotary method and a chemo-mechanical method
title A comparative microbiological study to assess caries excavation by conventional rotary method and a chemo-mechanical method
title_full A comparative microbiological study to assess caries excavation by conventional rotary method and a chemo-mechanical method
title_fullStr A comparative microbiological study to assess caries excavation by conventional rotary method and a chemo-mechanical method
title_full_unstemmed A comparative microbiological study to assess caries excavation by conventional rotary method and a chemo-mechanical method
title_short A comparative microbiological study to assess caries excavation by conventional rotary method and a chemo-mechanical method
title_sort comparative microbiological study to assess caries excavation by conventional rotary method and a chemo-mechanical method
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3636841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23633794
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.107420
work_keys_str_mv AT anegundirajesht acomparativemicrobiologicalstudytoassesscariesexcavationbyconventionalrotarymethodandachemomechanicalmethod
AT patilshruthib acomparativemicrobiologicalstudytoassesscariesexcavationbyconventionalrotarymethodandachemomechanicalmethod
AT tegginmaniviresh acomparativemicrobiologicalstudytoassesscariesexcavationbyconventionalrotarymethodandachemomechanicalmethod
AT shettysheetald acomparativemicrobiologicalstudytoassesscariesexcavationbyconventionalrotarymethodandachemomechanicalmethod
AT anegundirajesht comparativemicrobiologicalstudytoassesscariesexcavationbyconventionalrotarymethodandachemomechanicalmethod
AT patilshruthib comparativemicrobiologicalstudytoassesscariesexcavationbyconventionalrotarymethodandachemomechanicalmethod
AT tegginmaniviresh comparativemicrobiologicalstudytoassesscariesexcavationbyconventionalrotarymethodandachemomechanicalmethod
AT shettysheetald comparativemicrobiologicalstudytoassesscariesexcavationbyconventionalrotarymethodandachemomechanicalmethod