Cargando…
A comparative microbiological study to assess caries excavation by conventional rotary method and a chemo-mechanical method
AIMS: This study was aimed to determine the effectiveness of Papacárie(®) for caries removal as compared to the conventional method with respect to microbial flora, time, the amount of tissue removal, child's behavior, pain perception, and preference of treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty p...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3636841/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23633794 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.107420 |
_version_ | 1782267374332805120 |
---|---|
author | Anegundi, Rajesh T. Patil, Shruthi B. Tegginmani, Viresh Shetty, Sheetal D. |
author_facet | Anegundi, Rajesh T. Patil, Shruthi B. Tegginmani, Viresh Shetty, Sheetal D. |
author_sort | Anegundi, Rajesh T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: This study was aimed to determine the effectiveness of Papacárie(®) for caries removal as compared to the conventional method with respect to microbial flora, time, the amount of tissue removal, child's behavior, pain perception, and preference of treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty primary molars of 30 children of age 4-9 years were selected randomly and divided into two groups of 30 teeth each: Group A treated by conventional method and group B with Papacárie(®) method. RESULTS: Comparatively, no statistical difference was seen in microbial growth, total bacterial count, and lactobacilli count in both the groups (P = 0.36). The mean cavity entrance size with group A was 0.98133 mm and group B was 0.26083 mm (P < 0.001). The mean preparation time for group A was 4.7 Mins (minutes) and group B was 17.96 min s (P < 0.001). Majority of kids of both group A and B scored 3 (Frankl Behavior Rating Scale) before and after the treatment showing no statistical difference in their behavioral score (P = 1). In group A 50% of children experienced no pain as compared to 86.7% in group B (P = 0.01). There was no statistical difference in the preference of treatment (P = 0.12). CONCLUSION: Thus, the Chemo mechanical caries removal method can be considered as an effective method to control pain and preserve sound tooth structure during caries excavation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3636841 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36368412013-04-30 A comparative microbiological study to assess caries excavation by conventional rotary method and a chemo-mechanical method Anegundi, Rajesh T. Patil, Shruthi B. Tegginmani, Viresh Shetty, Sheetal D. Contemp Clin Dent Original Article AIMS: This study was aimed to determine the effectiveness of Papacárie(®) for caries removal as compared to the conventional method with respect to microbial flora, time, the amount of tissue removal, child's behavior, pain perception, and preference of treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty primary molars of 30 children of age 4-9 years were selected randomly and divided into two groups of 30 teeth each: Group A treated by conventional method and group B with Papacárie(®) method. RESULTS: Comparatively, no statistical difference was seen in microbial growth, total bacterial count, and lactobacilli count in both the groups (P = 0.36). The mean cavity entrance size with group A was 0.98133 mm and group B was 0.26083 mm (P < 0.001). The mean preparation time for group A was 4.7 Mins (minutes) and group B was 17.96 min s (P < 0.001). Majority of kids of both group A and B scored 3 (Frankl Behavior Rating Scale) before and after the treatment showing no statistical difference in their behavioral score (P = 1). In group A 50% of children experienced no pain as compared to 86.7% in group B (P = 0.01). There was no statistical difference in the preference of treatment (P = 0.12). CONCLUSION: Thus, the Chemo mechanical caries removal method can be considered as an effective method to control pain and preserve sound tooth structure during caries excavation. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3636841/ /pubmed/23633794 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.107420 Text en Copyright: © Contemporary Clinical Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Anegundi, Rajesh T. Patil, Shruthi B. Tegginmani, Viresh Shetty, Sheetal D. A comparative microbiological study to assess caries excavation by conventional rotary method and a chemo-mechanical method |
title | A comparative microbiological study to assess caries excavation by conventional rotary method and a chemo-mechanical method |
title_full | A comparative microbiological study to assess caries excavation by conventional rotary method and a chemo-mechanical method |
title_fullStr | A comparative microbiological study to assess caries excavation by conventional rotary method and a chemo-mechanical method |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparative microbiological study to assess caries excavation by conventional rotary method and a chemo-mechanical method |
title_short | A comparative microbiological study to assess caries excavation by conventional rotary method and a chemo-mechanical method |
title_sort | comparative microbiological study to assess caries excavation by conventional rotary method and a chemo-mechanical method |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3636841/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23633794 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.107420 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT anegundirajesht acomparativemicrobiologicalstudytoassesscariesexcavationbyconventionalrotarymethodandachemomechanicalmethod AT patilshruthib acomparativemicrobiologicalstudytoassesscariesexcavationbyconventionalrotarymethodandachemomechanicalmethod AT tegginmaniviresh acomparativemicrobiologicalstudytoassesscariesexcavationbyconventionalrotarymethodandachemomechanicalmethod AT shettysheetald acomparativemicrobiologicalstudytoassesscariesexcavationbyconventionalrotarymethodandachemomechanicalmethod AT anegundirajesht comparativemicrobiologicalstudytoassesscariesexcavationbyconventionalrotarymethodandachemomechanicalmethod AT patilshruthib comparativemicrobiologicalstudytoassesscariesexcavationbyconventionalrotarymethodandachemomechanicalmethod AT tegginmaniviresh comparativemicrobiologicalstudytoassesscariesexcavationbyconventionalrotarymethodandachemomechanicalmethod AT shettysheetald comparativemicrobiologicalstudytoassesscariesexcavationbyconventionalrotarymethodandachemomechanicalmethod |