Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of anti-plaque efficacy of herbal and 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash in a 4-day plaque re-growth study

BACKGROUND: Chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash has earned eponym of gold standard to treat and/or prevent periodontal disease. However, it has been reported to have local side-effects on long-term use. To explore a herbal alternative, the present study was carried out with an aim to compare the anti-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parwani, Simran R., Parwani, Rajkumar N., Chitnis, P. J., Dadlani, Himanshu P., Prasad, Sakur V. Sai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3636950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23633777
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.107478
_version_ 1782267383398793216
author Parwani, Simran R.
Parwani, Rajkumar N.
Chitnis, P. J.
Dadlani, Himanshu P.
Prasad, Sakur V. Sai
author_facet Parwani, Simran R.
Parwani, Rajkumar N.
Chitnis, P. J.
Dadlani, Himanshu P.
Prasad, Sakur V. Sai
author_sort Parwani, Simran R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash has earned eponym of gold standard to treat and/or prevent periodontal disease. However, it has been reported to have local side-effects on long-term use. To explore a herbal alternative, the present study was carried out with an aim to compare the anti-plaque efficacy of a herbal mouthwash with 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash and normal saline. MATERIALS AND METHODS: It was an examiner-blinded, parallel designed clinical trial, in which 90 pre-clinical dental students with gingival index (GI) ≤1 were enrolled. To begin with, GI and plaque index (PI) were recorded. Then, baseline plaque scores were brought to zero by professionally cleaning the teeth with scaling and polishing. After that, randomized 3 groups were made (of 30 subjects each - after excluding the drop-outs) who were refrained from regular mechanical oral hygiene measures. Subjects were asked to swish with respective mouthwash (0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash, herbal mouthwash, or normal saline) as per therapeutic dose for 4 days. Then, GI and PI scores were re-evaluated on 5(th) day by the same investigator, and the differences were compared statistically by ANOVA and Student's ‘t’-test. RESULTS AND OBSERVATIONS: Least post-rinsing GI and PI scores were demonstrated with 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash, followed by herbal mouthwash and highest scores with normal saline. The difference of post-rinsing PI scores between the chlorhexidine and herbal mouthwash groups was statistically non-significant, whereas this difference was significant between chlorhexidine and saline groups, and the difference between herbal and saline groups was non-significant. It was concluded that 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash remains the best anti-plaque agent. However, when socio-economic factor and/or side-effects of chlorhexidine need consideration, presently tested herbal mouthwash may be considered as a good alternative.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3636950
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36369502013-04-30 Comparative evaluation of anti-plaque efficacy of herbal and 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash in a 4-day plaque re-growth study Parwani, Simran R. Parwani, Rajkumar N. Chitnis, P. J. Dadlani, Himanshu P. Prasad, Sakur V. Sai J Indian Soc Periodontol Original Article BACKGROUND: Chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash has earned eponym of gold standard to treat and/or prevent periodontal disease. However, it has been reported to have local side-effects on long-term use. To explore a herbal alternative, the present study was carried out with an aim to compare the anti-plaque efficacy of a herbal mouthwash with 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash and normal saline. MATERIALS AND METHODS: It was an examiner-blinded, parallel designed clinical trial, in which 90 pre-clinical dental students with gingival index (GI) ≤1 were enrolled. To begin with, GI and plaque index (PI) were recorded. Then, baseline plaque scores were brought to zero by professionally cleaning the teeth with scaling and polishing. After that, randomized 3 groups were made (of 30 subjects each - after excluding the drop-outs) who were refrained from regular mechanical oral hygiene measures. Subjects were asked to swish with respective mouthwash (0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash, herbal mouthwash, or normal saline) as per therapeutic dose for 4 days. Then, GI and PI scores were re-evaluated on 5(th) day by the same investigator, and the differences were compared statistically by ANOVA and Student's ‘t’-test. RESULTS AND OBSERVATIONS: Least post-rinsing GI and PI scores were demonstrated with 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash, followed by herbal mouthwash and highest scores with normal saline. The difference of post-rinsing PI scores between the chlorhexidine and herbal mouthwash groups was statistically non-significant, whereas this difference was significant between chlorhexidine and saline groups, and the difference between herbal and saline groups was non-significant. It was concluded that 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash remains the best anti-plaque agent. However, when socio-economic factor and/or side-effects of chlorhexidine need consideration, presently tested herbal mouthwash may be considered as a good alternative. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3636950/ /pubmed/23633777 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.107478 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Parwani, Simran R.
Parwani, Rajkumar N.
Chitnis, P. J.
Dadlani, Himanshu P.
Prasad, Sakur V. Sai
Comparative evaluation of anti-plaque efficacy of herbal and 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash in a 4-day plaque re-growth study
title Comparative evaluation of anti-plaque efficacy of herbal and 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash in a 4-day plaque re-growth study
title_full Comparative evaluation of anti-plaque efficacy of herbal and 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash in a 4-day plaque re-growth study
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of anti-plaque efficacy of herbal and 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash in a 4-day plaque re-growth study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of anti-plaque efficacy of herbal and 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash in a 4-day plaque re-growth study
title_short Comparative evaluation of anti-plaque efficacy of herbal and 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash in a 4-day plaque re-growth study
title_sort comparative evaluation of anti-plaque efficacy of herbal and 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash in a 4-day plaque re-growth study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3636950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23633777
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.107478
work_keys_str_mv AT parwanisimranr comparativeevaluationofantiplaqueefficacyofherbaland02chlorhexidinegluconatemouthwashina4dayplaqueregrowthstudy
AT parwanirajkumarn comparativeevaluationofantiplaqueefficacyofherbaland02chlorhexidinegluconatemouthwashina4dayplaqueregrowthstudy
AT chitnispj comparativeevaluationofantiplaqueefficacyofherbaland02chlorhexidinegluconatemouthwashina4dayplaqueregrowthstudy
AT dadlanihimanshup comparativeevaluationofantiplaqueefficacyofherbaland02chlorhexidinegluconatemouthwashina4dayplaqueregrowthstudy
AT prasadsakurvsai comparativeevaluationofantiplaqueefficacyofherbaland02chlorhexidinegluconatemouthwashina4dayplaqueregrowthstudy