Cargando…

Neurocognitive profiles in treatment-resistant bipolar I and bipolar II disorder depression

BACKGROUND: The literature on the neuropsychological profiles in Bipolar disorder (BD) depression is sparse. The aims of the study were to assess the neurocognitive profiles in treatment-resistant, acutely admitted BD depression inpatients, to compare the neurocognitive functioning in patients with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kessler, Ute, Schoeyen, Helle K, Andreassen, Ole A, Eide, Geir E, Hammar, Åsa, Malt, Ulrik F, Oedegaard, Ketil J, Morken, Gunnar, Sundet, Kjetil, Vaaler, Arne E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3637095/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23557429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-13-105
_version_ 1782267405552058368
author Kessler, Ute
Schoeyen, Helle K
Andreassen, Ole A
Eide, Geir E
Hammar, Åsa
Malt, Ulrik F
Oedegaard, Ketil J
Morken, Gunnar
Sundet, Kjetil
Vaaler, Arne E
author_facet Kessler, Ute
Schoeyen, Helle K
Andreassen, Ole A
Eide, Geir E
Hammar, Åsa
Malt, Ulrik F
Oedegaard, Ketil J
Morken, Gunnar
Sundet, Kjetil
Vaaler, Arne E
author_sort Kessler, Ute
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The literature on the neuropsychological profiles in Bipolar disorder (BD) depression is sparse. The aims of the study were to assess the neurocognitive profiles in treatment-resistant, acutely admitted BD depression inpatients, to compare the neurocognitive functioning in patients with BD I and II, and to identify the demographic and clinical illness characteristics associated with cognitive functioning. METHODS: Acutely admitted BD I (n = 19) and BD II (n = 32) inpatients who fulfilled the DSM-IV-TR criteria for a major depressive episode were tested with the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB), the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence, the National Adult Reading Test, and a battery of clinical measures. RESULTS: Neurocognitive impairments were evident in the BD I and BD II depression inpatients within all MCCB domains. The numerical scores on all MCCB-measures were lower in the BD I group than in the BD II group, with a significant difference on one of the measures, category fluency. 68.4% of the BD I patients had clinically significant impairment (>1.5 SD below normal mean) in two or more domains compared to 37.5% of the BD II patients (p = 0.045). A significant reduction in IQ from the premorbid to the current level was seen in BD I but not BD II patients. Higher age was associated with greater neurocognitive deficits compared to age-adjusted published norms. CONCLUSIONS: A high proportion of patients with therapy-resistant BD I or II depression exhibited global neurocognitive impairments with clinically significant severity. The cognitive impairments were more common in BD I compared to BD II patients, particularly processing speed. These findings suggest that clinicians should be aware of the severe neurocognitive dysfunction in treatment-resistant bipolar depression, particularly in BD I. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration number: NCT00664976
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3637095
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36370952013-04-27 Neurocognitive profiles in treatment-resistant bipolar I and bipolar II disorder depression Kessler, Ute Schoeyen, Helle K Andreassen, Ole A Eide, Geir E Hammar, Åsa Malt, Ulrik F Oedegaard, Ketil J Morken, Gunnar Sundet, Kjetil Vaaler, Arne E BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: The literature on the neuropsychological profiles in Bipolar disorder (BD) depression is sparse. The aims of the study were to assess the neurocognitive profiles in treatment-resistant, acutely admitted BD depression inpatients, to compare the neurocognitive functioning in patients with BD I and II, and to identify the demographic and clinical illness characteristics associated with cognitive functioning. METHODS: Acutely admitted BD I (n = 19) and BD II (n = 32) inpatients who fulfilled the DSM-IV-TR criteria for a major depressive episode were tested with the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB), the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence, the National Adult Reading Test, and a battery of clinical measures. RESULTS: Neurocognitive impairments were evident in the BD I and BD II depression inpatients within all MCCB domains. The numerical scores on all MCCB-measures were lower in the BD I group than in the BD II group, with a significant difference on one of the measures, category fluency. 68.4% of the BD I patients had clinically significant impairment (>1.5 SD below normal mean) in two or more domains compared to 37.5% of the BD II patients (p = 0.045). A significant reduction in IQ from the premorbid to the current level was seen in BD I but not BD II patients. Higher age was associated with greater neurocognitive deficits compared to age-adjusted published norms. CONCLUSIONS: A high proportion of patients with therapy-resistant BD I or II depression exhibited global neurocognitive impairments with clinically significant severity. The cognitive impairments were more common in BD I compared to BD II patients, particularly processing speed. These findings suggest that clinicians should be aware of the severe neurocognitive dysfunction in treatment-resistant bipolar depression, particularly in BD I. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration number: NCT00664976 BioMed Central 2013-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3637095/ /pubmed/23557429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-13-105 Text en Copyright © 2013 Kessler et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kessler, Ute
Schoeyen, Helle K
Andreassen, Ole A
Eide, Geir E
Hammar, Åsa
Malt, Ulrik F
Oedegaard, Ketil J
Morken, Gunnar
Sundet, Kjetil
Vaaler, Arne E
Neurocognitive profiles in treatment-resistant bipolar I and bipolar II disorder depression
title Neurocognitive profiles in treatment-resistant bipolar I and bipolar II disorder depression
title_full Neurocognitive profiles in treatment-resistant bipolar I and bipolar II disorder depression
title_fullStr Neurocognitive profiles in treatment-resistant bipolar I and bipolar II disorder depression
title_full_unstemmed Neurocognitive profiles in treatment-resistant bipolar I and bipolar II disorder depression
title_short Neurocognitive profiles in treatment-resistant bipolar I and bipolar II disorder depression
title_sort neurocognitive profiles in treatment-resistant bipolar i and bipolar ii disorder depression
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3637095/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23557429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-13-105
work_keys_str_mv AT kesslerute neurocognitiveprofilesintreatmentresistantbipolariandbipolariidisorderdepression
AT schoeyenhellek neurocognitiveprofilesintreatmentresistantbipolariandbipolariidisorderdepression
AT andreassenolea neurocognitiveprofilesintreatmentresistantbipolariandbipolariidisorderdepression
AT eidegeire neurocognitiveprofilesintreatmentresistantbipolariandbipolariidisorderdepression
AT hammarasa neurocognitiveprofilesintreatmentresistantbipolariandbipolariidisorderdepression
AT maltulrikf neurocognitiveprofilesintreatmentresistantbipolariandbipolariidisorderdepression
AT oedegaardketilj neurocognitiveprofilesintreatmentresistantbipolariandbipolariidisorderdepression
AT morkengunnar neurocognitiveprofilesintreatmentresistantbipolariandbipolariidisorderdepression
AT sundetkjetil neurocognitiveprofilesintreatmentresistantbipolariandbipolariidisorderdepression
AT vaalerarnee neurocognitiveprofilesintreatmentresistantbipolariandbipolariidisorderdepression