Cargando…

Superior efficacy of Adalimumab in treating childhood refractory chronic uveitis when used as first biologic modifier drug: Adalimumab as starting anti-TNF-α therapy in childhood chronic uveitis

BACKGROUND: Nonetheless biologic modifier therapies are available treatment strategies for sight-threatening uveitis in children, the lack of evidence from head-to-head randomized controlled studies limits our understanding of timing of therapy when to commence therapy, which agent to choose and how...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simonini, Gabriele, Taddio, Andrea, Cattalini, Marco, Caputo, Roberto, de Libero, Cinzia, Parentin, Fulvio, Pagnini, Ilaria, Lepore, Loredana, Cimaz, Rolando
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3637103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23587261
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1546-0096-11-16
_version_ 1782267407378677760
author Simonini, Gabriele
Taddio, Andrea
Cattalini, Marco
Caputo, Roberto
de Libero, Cinzia
Parentin, Fulvio
Pagnini, Ilaria
Lepore, Loredana
Cimaz, Rolando
author_facet Simonini, Gabriele
Taddio, Andrea
Cattalini, Marco
Caputo, Roberto
de Libero, Cinzia
Parentin, Fulvio
Pagnini, Ilaria
Lepore, Loredana
Cimaz, Rolando
author_sort Simonini, Gabriele
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Nonetheless biologic modifier therapies are available treatment strategies for sight-threatening uveitis in children, the lack of evidence from head-to-head randomized controlled studies limits our understanding of timing of therapy when to commence therapy, which agent to choose and how long to continue treatment, and, in case of failure, if switching to another anti-TNF-α strategy might be eventually an option. Our aim was to compare the efficacy of Adalimumab when used as first anti-TNFα therapy versus Adalimumab used after the failure of a previous anti-TNFα (Infliximab) in an open-label, comparative, multi-center, cohort study of childhood chronic uveitis. METHODS: 26 patients (14 F, 12 M; median age: 8.6 years) with refractory, non-infectious active uveitis were enrolled. Due to the refractory course of uveitis to previous DMARD treatment, Group 1 received Adalimumab (24 mg/sq mt, every 2 weeks), as first anti-TNFα choice; Group 2 received Adalimumab, as second anti-TNFα drug, due to the loss of efficacy of Infliximab, administered after a period of at least 1 year. Both groups received Adalimumab for at least 1 year of treatment. Primary outcome was, once remission was achieved, the time to a first relapse. RESULTS: 14 children (10 with JIA, 3 with idiopathic uveitis, 1 with Behçet’s disease) were recruited in Group 1; 12 children (7 with JIA, 3 with idiopathic uveitis, 1 with early-onset sarcoidosis, 1 with Behçet’s disease) in Group 2. Group 2 showed a lower probability to steroid discontinuation during the first 12 months of treatment (Mantel-Cox χ(2)4.12, p<0.04). In long-term follow-up, Group 1 had higher probability of uveitis remission during the time of treatment on Adalimumab (median ±SE: 18 ±1.1 vs 4 ±0.6 months, CI 95%: 15.6-27.5 vs 2.7-5.2, Mantel-Cox χ(2)10.12, p<0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Even if limited to a relatively small group, our study suggests a better efficacy of Adalimumab when used as first anti-TNFα treatment in childhood chronic uveitis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3637103
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36371032013-04-27 Superior efficacy of Adalimumab in treating childhood refractory chronic uveitis when used as first biologic modifier drug: Adalimumab as starting anti-TNF-α therapy in childhood chronic uveitis Simonini, Gabriele Taddio, Andrea Cattalini, Marco Caputo, Roberto de Libero, Cinzia Parentin, Fulvio Pagnini, Ilaria Lepore, Loredana Cimaz, Rolando Pediatr Rheumatol Online J Research BACKGROUND: Nonetheless biologic modifier therapies are available treatment strategies for sight-threatening uveitis in children, the lack of evidence from head-to-head randomized controlled studies limits our understanding of timing of therapy when to commence therapy, which agent to choose and how long to continue treatment, and, in case of failure, if switching to another anti-TNF-α strategy might be eventually an option. Our aim was to compare the efficacy of Adalimumab when used as first anti-TNFα therapy versus Adalimumab used after the failure of a previous anti-TNFα (Infliximab) in an open-label, comparative, multi-center, cohort study of childhood chronic uveitis. METHODS: 26 patients (14 F, 12 M; median age: 8.6 years) with refractory, non-infectious active uveitis were enrolled. Due to the refractory course of uveitis to previous DMARD treatment, Group 1 received Adalimumab (24 mg/sq mt, every 2 weeks), as first anti-TNFα choice; Group 2 received Adalimumab, as second anti-TNFα drug, due to the loss of efficacy of Infliximab, administered after a period of at least 1 year. Both groups received Adalimumab for at least 1 year of treatment. Primary outcome was, once remission was achieved, the time to a first relapse. RESULTS: 14 children (10 with JIA, 3 with idiopathic uveitis, 1 with Behçet’s disease) were recruited in Group 1; 12 children (7 with JIA, 3 with idiopathic uveitis, 1 with early-onset sarcoidosis, 1 with Behçet’s disease) in Group 2. Group 2 showed a lower probability to steroid discontinuation during the first 12 months of treatment (Mantel-Cox χ(2)4.12, p<0.04). In long-term follow-up, Group 1 had higher probability of uveitis remission during the time of treatment on Adalimumab (median ±SE: 18 ±1.1 vs 4 ±0.6 months, CI 95%: 15.6-27.5 vs 2.7-5.2, Mantel-Cox χ(2)10.12, p<0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Even if limited to a relatively small group, our study suggests a better efficacy of Adalimumab when used as first anti-TNFα treatment in childhood chronic uveitis. BioMed Central 2013-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3637103/ /pubmed/23587261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1546-0096-11-16 Text en Copyright © 2013 Simonini et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Simonini, Gabriele
Taddio, Andrea
Cattalini, Marco
Caputo, Roberto
de Libero, Cinzia
Parentin, Fulvio
Pagnini, Ilaria
Lepore, Loredana
Cimaz, Rolando
Superior efficacy of Adalimumab in treating childhood refractory chronic uveitis when used as first biologic modifier drug: Adalimumab as starting anti-TNF-α therapy in childhood chronic uveitis
title Superior efficacy of Adalimumab in treating childhood refractory chronic uveitis when used as first biologic modifier drug: Adalimumab as starting anti-TNF-α therapy in childhood chronic uveitis
title_full Superior efficacy of Adalimumab in treating childhood refractory chronic uveitis when used as first biologic modifier drug: Adalimumab as starting anti-TNF-α therapy in childhood chronic uveitis
title_fullStr Superior efficacy of Adalimumab in treating childhood refractory chronic uveitis when used as first biologic modifier drug: Adalimumab as starting anti-TNF-α therapy in childhood chronic uveitis
title_full_unstemmed Superior efficacy of Adalimumab in treating childhood refractory chronic uveitis when used as first biologic modifier drug: Adalimumab as starting anti-TNF-α therapy in childhood chronic uveitis
title_short Superior efficacy of Adalimumab in treating childhood refractory chronic uveitis when used as first biologic modifier drug: Adalimumab as starting anti-TNF-α therapy in childhood chronic uveitis
title_sort superior efficacy of adalimumab in treating childhood refractory chronic uveitis when used as first biologic modifier drug: adalimumab as starting anti-tnf-α therapy in childhood chronic uveitis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3637103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23587261
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1546-0096-11-16
work_keys_str_mv AT simoninigabriele superiorefficacyofadalimumabintreatingchildhoodrefractorychronicuveitiswhenusedasfirstbiologicmodifierdrugadalimumabasstartingantitnfatherapyinchildhoodchronicuveitis
AT taddioandrea superiorefficacyofadalimumabintreatingchildhoodrefractorychronicuveitiswhenusedasfirstbiologicmodifierdrugadalimumabasstartingantitnfatherapyinchildhoodchronicuveitis
AT cattalinimarco superiorefficacyofadalimumabintreatingchildhoodrefractorychronicuveitiswhenusedasfirstbiologicmodifierdrugadalimumabasstartingantitnfatherapyinchildhoodchronicuveitis
AT caputoroberto superiorefficacyofadalimumabintreatingchildhoodrefractorychronicuveitiswhenusedasfirstbiologicmodifierdrugadalimumabasstartingantitnfatherapyinchildhoodchronicuveitis
AT deliberocinzia superiorefficacyofadalimumabintreatingchildhoodrefractorychronicuveitiswhenusedasfirstbiologicmodifierdrugadalimumabasstartingantitnfatherapyinchildhoodchronicuveitis
AT parentinfulvio superiorefficacyofadalimumabintreatingchildhoodrefractorychronicuveitiswhenusedasfirstbiologicmodifierdrugadalimumabasstartingantitnfatherapyinchildhoodchronicuveitis
AT pagniniilaria superiorefficacyofadalimumabintreatingchildhoodrefractorychronicuveitiswhenusedasfirstbiologicmodifierdrugadalimumabasstartingantitnfatherapyinchildhoodchronicuveitis
AT leporeloredana superiorefficacyofadalimumabintreatingchildhoodrefractorychronicuveitiswhenusedasfirstbiologicmodifierdrugadalimumabasstartingantitnfatherapyinchildhoodchronicuveitis
AT cimazrolando superiorefficacyofadalimumabintreatingchildhoodrefractorychronicuveitiswhenusedasfirstbiologicmodifierdrugadalimumabasstartingantitnfatherapyinchildhoodchronicuveitis