Cargando…
Superior efficacy of Adalimumab in treating childhood refractory chronic uveitis when used as first biologic modifier drug: Adalimumab as starting anti-TNF-α therapy in childhood chronic uveitis
BACKGROUND: Nonetheless biologic modifier therapies are available treatment strategies for sight-threatening uveitis in children, the lack of evidence from head-to-head randomized controlled studies limits our understanding of timing of therapy when to commence therapy, which agent to choose and how...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3637103/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23587261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1546-0096-11-16 |
_version_ | 1782267407378677760 |
---|---|
author | Simonini, Gabriele Taddio, Andrea Cattalini, Marco Caputo, Roberto de Libero, Cinzia Parentin, Fulvio Pagnini, Ilaria Lepore, Loredana Cimaz, Rolando |
author_facet | Simonini, Gabriele Taddio, Andrea Cattalini, Marco Caputo, Roberto de Libero, Cinzia Parentin, Fulvio Pagnini, Ilaria Lepore, Loredana Cimaz, Rolando |
author_sort | Simonini, Gabriele |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Nonetheless biologic modifier therapies are available treatment strategies for sight-threatening uveitis in children, the lack of evidence from head-to-head randomized controlled studies limits our understanding of timing of therapy when to commence therapy, which agent to choose and how long to continue treatment, and, in case of failure, if switching to another anti-TNF-α strategy might be eventually an option. Our aim was to compare the efficacy of Adalimumab when used as first anti-TNFα therapy versus Adalimumab used after the failure of a previous anti-TNFα (Infliximab) in an open-label, comparative, multi-center, cohort study of childhood chronic uveitis. METHODS: 26 patients (14 F, 12 M; median age: 8.6 years) with refractory, non-infectious active uveitis were enrolled. Due to the refractory course of uveitis to previous DMARD treatment, Group 1 received Adalimumab (24 mg/sq mt, every 2 weeks), as first anti-TNFα choice; Group 2 received Adalimumab, as second anti-TNFα drug, due to the loss of efficacy of Infliximab, administered after a period of at least 1 year. Both groups received Adalimumab for at least 1 year of treatment. Primary outcome was, once remission was achieved, the time to a first relapse. RESULTS: 14 children (10 with JIA, 3 with idiopathic uveitis, 1 with Behçet’s disease) were recruited in Group 1; 12 children (7 with JIA, 3 with idiopathic uveitis, 1 with early-onset sarcoidosis, 1 with Behçet’s disease) in Group 2. Group 2 showed a lower probability to steroid discontinuation during the first 12 months of treatment (Mantel-Cox χ(2)4.12, p<0.04). In long-term follow-up, Group 1 had higher probability of uveitis remission during the time of treatment on Adalimumab (median ±SE: 18 ±1.1 vs 4 ±0.6 months, CI 95%: 15.6-27.5 vs 2.7-5.2, Mantel-Cox χ(2)10.12, p<0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Even if limited to a relatively small group, our study suggests a better efficacy of Adalimumab when used as first anti-TNFα treatment in childhood chronic uveitis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3637103 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36371032013-04-27 Superior efficacy of Adalimumab in treating childhood refractory chronic uveitis when used as first biologic modifier drug: Adalimumab as starting anti-TNF-α therapy in childhood chronic uveitis Simonini, Gabriele Taddio, Andrea Cattalini, Marco Caputo, Roberto de Libero, Cinzia Parentin, Fulvio Pagnini, Ilaria Lepore, Loredana Cimaz, Rolando Pediatr Rheumatol Online J Research BACKGROUND: Nonetheless biologic modifier therapies are available treatment strategies for sight-threatening uveitis in children, the lack of evidence from head-to-head randomized controlled studies limits our understanding of timing of therapy when to commence therapy, which agent to choose and how long to continue treatment, and, in case of failure, if switching to another anti-TNF-α strategy might be eventually an option. Our aim was to compare the efficacy of Adalimumab when used as first anti-TNFα therapy versus Adalimumab used after the failure of a previous anti-TNFα (Infliximab) in an open-label, comparative, multi-center, cohort study of childhood chronic uveitis. METHODS: 26 patients (14 F, 12 M; median age: 8.6 years) with refractory, non-infectious active uveitis were enrolled. Due to the refractory course of uveitis to previous DMARD treatment, Group 1 received Adalimumab (24 mg/sq mt, every 2 weeks), as first anti-TNFα choice; Group 2 received Adalimumab, as second anti-TNFα drug, due to the loss of efficacy of Infliximab, administered after a period of at least 1 year. Both groups received Adalimumab for at least 1 year of treatment. Primary outcome was, once remission was achieved, the time to a first relapse. RESULTS: 14 children (10 with JIA, 3 with idiopathic uveitis, 1 with Behçet’s disease) were recruited in Group 1; 12 children (7 with JIA, 3 with idiopathic uveitis, 1 with early-onset sarcoidosis, 1 with Behçet’s disease) in Group 2. Group 2 showed a lower probability to steroid discontinuation during the first 12 months of treatment (Mantel-Cox χ(2)4.12, p<0.04). In long-term follow-up, Group 1 had higher probability of uveitis remission during the time of treatment on Adalimumab (median ±SE: 18 ±1.1 vs 4 ±0.6 months, CI 95%: 15.6-27.5 vs 2.7-5.2, Mantel-Cox χ(2)10.12, p<0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Even if limited to a relatively small group, our study suggests a better efficacy of Adalimumab when used as first anti-TNFα treatment in childhood chronic uveitis. BioMed Central 2013-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3637103/ /pubmed/23587261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1546-0096-11-16 Text en Copyright © 2013 Simonini et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Simonini, Gabriele Taddio, Andrea Cattalini, Marco Caputo, Roberto de Libero, Cinzia Parentin, Fulvio Pagnini, Ilaria Lepore, Loredana Cimaz, Rolando Superior efficacy of Adalimumab in treating childhood refractory chronic uveitis when used as first biologic modifier drug: Adalimumab as starting anti-TNF-α therapy in childhood chronic uveitis |
title | Superior efficacy of Adalimumab in treating childhood refractory chronic uveitis when used as first biologic modifier drug: Adalimumab as starting anti-TNF-α therapy in childhood chronic uveitis |
title_full | Superior efficacy of Adalimumab in treating childhood refractory chronic uveitis when used as first biologic modifier drug: Adalimumab as starting anti-TNF-α therapy in childhood chronic uveitis |
title_fullStr | Superior efficacy of Adalimumab in treating childhood refractory chronic uveitis when used as first biologic modifier drug: Adalimumab as starting anti-TNF-α therapy in childhood chronic uveitis |
title_full_unstemmed | Superior efficacy of Adalimumab in treating childhood refractory chronic uveitis when used as first biologic modifier drug: Adalimumab as starting anti-TNF-α therapy in childhood chronic uveitis |
title_short | Superior efficacy of Adalimumab in treating childhood refractory chronic uveitis when used as first biologic modifier drug: Adalimumab as starting anti-TNF-α therapy in childhood chronic uveitis |
title_sort | superior efficacy of adalimumab in treating childhood refractory chronic uveitis when used as first biologic modifier drug: adalimumab as starting anti-tnf-α therapy in childhood chronic uveitis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3637103/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23587261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1546-0096-11-16 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT simoninigabriele superiorefficacyofadalimumabintreatingchildhoodrefractorychronicuveitiswhenusedasfirstbiologicmodifierdrugadalimumabasstartingantitnfatherapyinchildhoodchronicuveitis AT taddioandrea superiorefficacyofadalimumabintreatingchildhoodrefractorychronicuveitiswhenusedasfirstbiologicmodifierdrugadalimumabasstartingantitnfatherapyinchildhoodchronicuveitis AT cattalinimarco superiorefficacyofadalimumabintreatingchildhoodrefractorychronicuveitiswhenusedasfirstbiologicmodifierdrugadalimumabasstartingantitnfatherapyinchildhoodchronicuveitis AT caputoroberto superiorefficacyofadalimumabintreatingchildhoodrefractorychronicuveitiswhenusedasfirstbiologicmodifierdrugadalimumabasstartingantitnfatherapyinchildhoodchronicuveitis AT deliberocinzia superiorefficacyofadalimumabintreatingchildhoodrefractorychronicuveitiswhenusedasfirstbiologicmodifierdrugadalimumabasstartingantitnfatherapyinchildhoodchronicuveitis AT parentinfulvio superiorefficacyofadalimumabintreatingchildhoodrefractorychronicuveitiswhenusedasfirstbiologicmodifierdrugadalimumabasstartingantitnfatherapyinchildhoodchronicuveitis AT pagniniilaria superiorefficacyofadalimumabintreatingchildhoodrefractorychronicuveitiswhenusedasfirstbiologicmodifierdrugadalimumabasstartingantitnfatherapyinchildhoodchronicuveitis AT leporeloredana superiorefficacyofadalimumabintreatingchildhoodrefractorychronicuveitiswhenusedasfirstbiologicmodifierdrugadalimumabasstartingantitnfatherapyinchildhoodchronicuveitis AT cimazrolando superiorefficacyofadalimumabintreatingchildhoodrefractorychronicuveitiswhenusedasfirstbiologicmodifierdrugadalimumabasstartingantitnfatherapyinchildhoodchronicuveitis |