Cargando…

‘BRICS without straw’? A systematic literature review of newly emerging economies’ influence in global health

BACKGROUND: Since 2010, five newly emerging economies collectively known as ‘BRICS’ (Brazil, India, Russia, China and South Africa) have caught the imagination, and scholarly attention, of political scientists, economists and development specialists. The prospect of a unified geopolitical bloc, cons...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harmer, Andrew, Xiao, Yina, Missoni, Eduardo, Tediosi, Fabrizio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3637153/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23587342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-8603-9-15
_version_ 1782267418258702336
author Harmer, Andrew
Xiao, Yina
Missoni, Eduardo
Tediosi, Fabrizio
author_facet Harmer, Andrew
Xiao, Yina
Missoni, Eduardo
Tediosi, Fabrizio
author_sort Harmer, Andrew
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Since 2010, five newly emerging economies collectively known as ‘BRICS’ (Brazil, India, Russia, China and South Africa) have caught the imagination, and scholarly attention, of political scientists, economists and development specialists. The prospect of a unified geopolitical bloc, consciously seeking to re-frame international (and global) health development with a new set of ideas and values, has also, if belatedly, begun to attract the attention of the global health community. But what influence, if any, do the BRICS wield in global health, and, if they do wield influence, how has that influence been conceptualized and recorded in the literature? METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review in (March-December 2012) of documents retrieved from the databases EMBASE, PubMed/Medline, Global Health, and Google Scholar, and the websites of relevant international organisations, research institutions and philanthropic organisations. The results were synthesised using a framework of influence developed for the review from the political science literature. RESULTS: Our initial search of databases and websites yielded 887 documents. Exclusion criteria narrowed the number of documents to 71 journal articles and 23 reports. Two researchers using an agreed set of inclusion criteria independently screened the 94 documents, leaving just 7 documents. We found just one document that provided sustained analysis of the BRICS’ collective influence; the overwhelming tendency was to describe individual BRICS countries influence. Although influence was predominantly framed by BRICS countries’ material capability, there were examples of institutional and ideational influence - particularly from Brazil. Individual BRICS countries were primarily ‘opportunity seekers’ and region mobilisers but with potential to become ‘issue leaders’ and region organisers. CONCLUSION: Though small in number, the written output on BRICS influence in global health has increased significantly since a similar review conducted in 2010 found just one study. Whilst it may still be ‘early days’ for newly-emerging economies influence in global health to have matured, we argue that there is scope to further develop the concept of influence in global health, but also to better understand the ontology of groups of countries such as BRICS. The BRICS have made a number of important commitments towards reforming global health, but if they are to be more than a memorable acronym they need to start putting those collective commitments into action. Keywords BRICS, global health, influence, newly emerging economies, Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3637153
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36371532013-04-27 ‘BRICS without straw’? A systematic literature review of newly emerging economies’ influence in global health Harmer, Andrew Xiao, Yina Missoni, Eduardo Tediosi, Fabrizio Global Health Research BACKGROUND: Since 2010, five newly emerging economies collectively known as ‘BRICS’ (Brazil, India, Russia, China and South Africa) have caught the imagination, and scholarly attention, of political scientists, economists and development specialists. The prospect of a unified geopolitical bloc, consciously seeking to re-frame international (and global) health development with a new set of ideas and values, has also, if belatedly, begun to attract the attention of the global health community. But what influence, if any, do the BRICS wield in global health, and, if they do wield influence, how has that influence been conceptualized and recorded in the literature? METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review in (March-December 2012) of documents retrieved from the databases EMBASE, PubMed/Medline, Global Health, and Google Scholar, and the websites of relevant international organisations, research institutions and philanthropic organisations. The results were synthesised using a framework of influence developed for the review from the political science literature. RESULTS: Our initial search of databases and websites yielded 887 documents. Exclusion criteria narrowed the number of documents to 71 journal articles and 23 reports. Two researchers using an agreed set of inclusion criteria independently screened the 94 documents, leaving just 7 documents. We found just one document that provided sustained analysis of the BRICS’ collective influence; the overwhelming tendency was to describe individual BRICS countries influence. Although influence was predominantly framed by BRICS countries’ material capability, there were examples of institutional and ideational influence - particularly from Brazil. Individual BRICS countries were primarily ‘opportunity seekers’ and region mobilisers but with potential to become ‘issue leaders’ and region organisers. CONCLUSION: Though small in number, the written output on BRICS influence in global health has increased significantly since a similar review conducted in 2010 found just one study. Whilst it may still be ‘early days’ for newly-emerging economies influence in global health to have matured, we argue that there is scope to further develop the concept of influence in global health, but also to better understand the ontology of groups of countries such as BRICS. The BRICS have made a number of important commitments towards reforming global health, but if they are to be more than a memorable acronym they need to start putting those collective commitments into action. Keywords BRICS, global health, influence, newly emerging economies, Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa. BioMed Central 2013-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3637153/ /pubmed/23587342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-8603-9-15 Text en Copyright © 2013 Harmer et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Harmer, Andrew
Xiao, Yina
Missoni, Eduardo
Tediosi, Fabrizio
‘BRICS without straw’? A systematic literature review of newly emerging economies’ influence in global health
title ‘BRICS without straw’? A systematic literature review of newly emerging economies’ influence in global health
title_full ‘BRICS without straw’? A systematic literature review of newly emerging economies’ influence in global health
title_fullStr ‘BRICS without straw’? A systematic literature review of newly emerging economies’ influence in global health
title_full_unstemmed ‘BRICS without straw’? A systematic literature review of newly emerging economies’ influence in global health
title_short ‘BRICS without straw’? A systematic literature review of newly emerging economies’ influence in global health
title_sort ‘brics without straw’? a systematic literature review of newly emerging economies’ influence in global health
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3637153/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23587342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-8603-9-15
work_keys_str_mv AT harmerandrew bricswithoutstrawasystematicliteraturereviewofnewlyemergingeconomiesinfluenceinglobalhealth
AT xiaoyina bricswithoutstrawasystematicliteraturereviewofnewlyemergingeconomiesinfluenceinglobalhealth
AT missonieduardo bricswithoutstrawasystematicliteraturereviewofnewlyemergingeconomiesinfluenceinglobalhealth
AT tediosifabrizio bricswithoutstrawasystematicliteraturereviewofnewlyemergingeconomiesinfluenceinglobalhealth