Cargando…

Differential Effects of Motor Efference Copies and Proprioceptive Information on Response Evaluation Processes

It is well-kown that sensory information influences the way we execute motor responses. However, less is known about if and how sensory and motor information are integrated in the subsequent process of response evaluation. We used a modified Simon Task to investigate how these streams of information...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stock, Ann-Kathrin, Wascher, Edmund, Beste, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3637248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23658624
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062335
_version_ 1782267439038332928
author Stock, Ann-Kathrin
Wascher, Edmund
Beste, Christian
author_facet Stock, Ann-Kathrin
Wascher, Edmund
Beste, Christian
author_sort Stock, Ann-Kathrin
collection PubMed
description It is well-kown that sensory information influences the way we execute motor responses. However, less is known about if and how sensory and motor information are integrated in the subsequent process of response evaluation. We used a modified Simon Task to investigate how these streams of information are integrated in response evaluation processes, applying an in-depth neurophysiological analysis of event-related potentials (ERPs), time-frequency decomposition and sLORETA. The results show that response evaluation processes are differentially modulated by afferent proprioceptive information and efference copies. While the influence of proprioceptive information is mediated via oscillations in different frequency bands, efference copy based information about the motor execution is specifically mediated via oscillations in the theta frequency band. Stages of visual perception and attention were not modulated by the interaction of proprioception and motor efference copies. Brain areas modulated by the interactive effects of proprioceptive and efference copy based information included the middle frontal gyrus and the supplementary motor area (SMA), suggesting that these areas integrate sensory information for the purpose of response evaluation. The results show how motor response evaluation processes are modulated by information about both the execution and the location of a response.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3637248
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36372482013-05-08 Differential Effects of Motor Efference Copies and Proprioceptive Information on Response Evaluation Processes Stock, Ann-Kathrin Wascher, Edmund Beste, Christian PLoS One Research Article It is well-kown that sensory information influences the way we execute motor responses. However, less is known about if and how sensory and motor information are integrated in the subsequent process of response evaluation. We used a modified Simon Task to investigate how these streams of information are integrated in response evaluation processes, applying an in-depth neurophysiological analysis of event-related potentials (ERPs), time-frequency decomposition and sLORETA. The results show that response evaluation processes are differentially modulated by afferent proprioceptive information and efference copies. While the influence of proprioceptive information is mediated via oscillations in different frequency bands, efference copy based information about the motor execution is specifically mediated via oscillations in the theta frequency band. Stages of visual perception and attention were not modulated by the interaction of proprioception and motor efference copies. Brain areas modulated by the interactive effects of proprioceptive and efference copy based information included the middle frontal gyrus and the supplementary motor area (SMA), suggesting that these areas integrate sensory information for the purpose of response evaluation. The results show how motor response evaluation processes are modulated by information about both the execution and the location of a response. Public Library of Science 2013-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3637248/ /pubmed/23658624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062335 Text en © 2013 Stock et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Stock, Ann-Kathrin
Wascher, Edmund
Beste, Christian
Differential Effects of Motor Efference Copies and Proprioceptive Information on Response Evaluation Processes
title Differential Effects of Motor Efference Copies and Proprioceptive Information on Response Evaluation Processes
title_full Differential Effects of Motor Efference Copies and Proprioceptive Information on Response Evaluation Processes
title_fullStr Differential Effects of Motor Efference Copies and Proprioceptive Information on Response Evaluation Processes
title_full_unstemmed Differential Effects of Motor Efference Copies and Proprioceptive Information on Response Evaluation Processes
title_short Differential Effects of Motor Efference Copies and Proprioceptive Information on Response Evaluation Processes
title_sort differential effects of motor efference copies and proprioceptive information on response evaluation processes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3637248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23658624
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062335
work_keys_str_mv AT stockannkathrin differentialeffectsofmotorefferencecopiesandproprioceptiveinformationonresponseevaluationprocesses
AT wascheredmund differentialeffectsofmotorefferencecopiesandproprioceptiveinformationonresponseevaluationprocesses
AT bestechristian differentialeffectsofmotorefferencecopiesandproprioceptiveinformationonresponseevaluationprocesses