Cargando…
Differential Effects of Motor Efference Copies and Proprioceptive Information on Response Evaluation Processes
It is well-kown that sensory information influences the way we execute motor responses. However, less is known about if and how sensory and motor information are integrated in the subsequent process of response evaluation. We used a modified Simon Task to investigate how these streams of information...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3637248/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23658624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062335 |
_version_ | 1782267439038332928 |
---|---|
author | Stock, Ann-Kathrin Wascher, Edmund Beste, Christian |
author_facet | Stock, Ann-Kathrin Wascher, Edmund Beste, Christian |
author_sort | Stock, Ann-Kathrin |
collection | PubMed |
description | It is well-kown that sensory information influences the way we execute motor responses. However, less is known about if and how sensory and motor information are integrated in the subsequent process of response evaluation. We used a modified Simon Task to investigate how these streams of information are integrated in response evaluation processes, applying an in-depth neurophysiological analysis of event-related potentials (ERPs), time-frequency decomposition and sLORETA. The results show that response evaluation processes are differentially modulated by afferent proprioceptive information and efference copies. While the influence of proprioceptive information is mediated via oscillations in different frequency bands, efference copy based information about the motor execution is specifically mediated via oscillations in the theta frequency band. Stages of visual perception and attention were not modulated by the interaction of proprioception and motor efference copies. Brain areas modulated by the interactive effects of proprioceptive and efference copy based information included the middle frontal gyrus and the supplementary motor area (SMA), suggesting that these areas integrate sensory information for the purpose of response evaluation. The results show how motor response evaluation processes are modulated by information about both the execution and the location of a response. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3637248 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36372482013-05-08 Differential Effects of Motor Efference Copies and Proprioceptive Information on Response Evaluation Processes Stock, Ann-Kathrin Wascher, Edmund Beste, Christian PLoS One Research Article It is well-kown that sensory information influences the way we execute motor responses. However, less is known about if and how sensory and motor information are integrated in the subsequent process of response evaluation. We used a modified Simon Task to investigate how these streams of information are integrated in response evaluation processes, applying an in-depth neurophysiological analysis of event-related potentials (ERPs), time-frequency decomposition and sLORETA. The results show that response evaluation processes are differentially modulated by afferent proprioceptive information and efference copies. While the influence of proprioceptive information is mediated via oscillations in different frequency bands, efference copy based information about the motor execution is specifically mediated via oscillations in the theta frequency band. Stages of visual perception and attention were not modulated by the interaction of proprioception and motor efference copies. Brain areas modulated by the interactive effects of proprioceptive and efference copy based information included the middle frontal gyrus and the supplementary motor area (SMA), suggesting that these areas integrate sensory information for the purpose of response evaluation. The results show how motor response evaluation processes are modulated by information about both the execution and the location of a response. Public Library of Science 2013-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3637248/ /pubmed/23658624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062335 Text en © 2013 Stock et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Stock, Ann-Kathrin Wascher, Edmund Beste, Christian Differential Effects of Motor Efference Copies and Proprioceptive Information on Response Evaluation Processes |
title | Differential Effects of Motor Efference Copies and Proprioceptive Information on Response Evaluation Processes |
title_full | Differential Effects of Motor Efference Copies and Proprioceptive Information on Response Evaluation Processes |
title_fullStr | Differential Effects of Motor Efference Copies and Proprioceptive Information on Response Evaluation Processes |
title_full_unstemmed | Differential Effects of Motor Efference Copies and Proprioceptive Information on Response Evaluation Processes |
title_short | Differential Effects of Motor Efference Copies and Proprioceptive Information on Response Evaluation Processes |
title_sort | differential effects of motor efference copies and proprioceptive information on response evaluation processes |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3637248/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23658624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062335 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stockannkathrin differentialeffectsofmotorefferencecopiesandproprioceptiveinformationonresponseevaluationprocesses AT wascheredmund differentialeffectsofmotorefferencecopiesandproprioceptiveinformationonresponseevaluationprocesses AT bestechristian differentialeffectsofmotorefferencecopiesandproprioceptiveinformationonresponseevaluationprocesses |