Cargando…

Shear- vs. nanotopography-guided control of growth of endothelial cells on RGD-nanoparticle-nanowell arrays

Endothelialization of therapeutic cardiovascular implants is essential for their intravascular hemocompatibility. We previously described a novel nanowell-RGD-nanoparticle ensemble, which when applied to surfaces led to enhanced endothelialization and retention under static conditions and low flow r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCracken, Katherine E, Tran, Phat L, You, David J, Slepian, Marvin J, Yoon, Jeong-Yeol
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3637365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23607894
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-1611-7-11
_version_ 1782267462639681536
author McCracken, Katherine E
Tran, Phat L
You, David J
Slepian, Marvin J
Yoon, Jeong-Yeol
author_facet McCracken, Katherine E
Tran, Phat L
You, David J
Slepian, Marvin J
Yoon, Jeong-Yeol
author_sort McCracken, Katherine E
collection PubMed
description Endothelialization of therapeutic cardiovascular implants is essential for their intravascular hemocompatibility. We previously described a novel nanowell-RGD-nanoparticle ensemble, which when applied to surfaces led to enhanced endothelialization and retention under static conditions and low flow rates. In the present study we extend our work to determine the interrelated effects of flow rate and the orientation of ensemble-decorated surface arrays on the growth, adhesion and morphology of endothelial cells. Human umbilical vascular endothelial cells (HUVECs) were grown on array surfaces with either 1 μm × 5 μm spacing (“parallel to flow”) and 5 μm × 1 μm spacing (“perpendicular to flow”) and were exposed to a range of shear stress of (0 to 4.7 ± 0.2 dyn·cm(-2) ), utilizing a pulsatile flow chamber. Under physiological flow (4.7 ± 0.2 dyn·cm(-2)), RGD-nanoparticle-nanowell array patterning significantly enhanced cell adhesion and spreading compared with control surfaces and with static conditions. Furthermore, improved adhesion coincided with higher alignment to surface patterning, intimating the importance of interaction and response to the array surface as a means of resisting flow detachment. Under sub-physiological condition (1.7 ± 0.3 dyn·cm(-2); corresponding to early angiogenesis), nanowell-nanoparticle patterning did not provide enhanced cell growth and adhesion compared with control surfaces. However, it revealed increased alignment along the direction of flow, rather than the direction of the pattern, thus potentially indicating a threshold for cell guidance and related retention. These results could provide a cue for controlling cell growth and alignment under varying physiological conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3637365
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36373652013-04-27 Shear- vs. nanotopography-guided control of growth of endothelial cells on RGD-nanoparticle-nanowell arrays McCracken, Katherine E Tran, Phat L You, David J Slepian, Marvin J Yoon, Jeong-Yeol J Biol Eng Research Endothelialization of therapeutic cardiovascular implants is essential for their intravascular hemocompatibility. We previously described a novel nanowell-RGD-nanoparticle ensemble, which when applied to surfaces led to enhanced endothelialization and retention under static conditions and low flow rates. In the present study we extend our work to determine the interrelated effects of flow rate and the orientation of ensemble-decorated surface arrays on the growth, adhesion and morphology of endothelial cells. Human umbilical vascular endothelial cells (HUVECs) were grown on array surfaces with either 1 μm × 5 μm spacing (“parallel to flow”) and 5 μm × 1 μm spacing (“perpendicular to flow”) and were exposed to a range of shear stress of (0 to 4.7 ± 0.2 dyn·cm(-2) ), utilizing a pulsatile flow chamber. Under physiological flow (4.7 ± 0.2 dyn·cm(-2)), RGD-nanoparticle-nanowell array patterning significantly enhanced cell adhesion and spreading compared with control surfaces and with static conditions. Furthermore, improved adhesion coincided with higher alignment to surface patterning, intimating the importance of interaction and response to the array surface as a means of resisting flow detachment. Under sub-physiological condition (1.7 ± 0.3 dyn·cm(-2); corresponding to early angiogenesis), nanowell-nanoparticle patterning did not provide enhanced cell growth and adhesion compared with control surfaces. However, it revealed increased alignment along the direction of flow, rather than the direction of the pattern, thus potentially indicating a threshold for cell guidance and related retention. These results could provide a cue for controlling cell growth and alignment under varying physiological conditions. BioMed Central 2013-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3637365/ /pubmed/23607894 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-1611-7-11 Text en Copyright © 2013 McCracken et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
McCracken, Katherine E
Tran, Phat L
You, David J
Slepian, Marvin J
Yoon, Jeong-Yeol
Shear- vs. nanotopography-guided control of growth of endothelial cells on RGD-nanoparticle-nanowell arrays
title Shear- vs. nanotopography-guided control of growth of endothelial cells on RGD-nanoparticle-nanowell arrays
title_full Shear- vs. nanotopography-guided control of growth of endothelial cells on RGD-nanoparticle-nanowell arrays
title_fullStr Shear- vs. nanotopography-guided control of growth of endothelial cells on RGD-nanoparticle-nanowell arrays
title_full_unstemmed Shear- vs. nanotopography-guided control of growth of endothelial cells on RGD-nanoparticle-nanowell arrays
title_short Shear- vs. nanotopography-guided control of growth of endothelial cells on RGD-nanoparticle-nanowell arrays
title_sort shear- vs. nanotopography-guided control of growth of endothelial cells on rgd-nanoparticle-nanowell arrays
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3637365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23607894
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-1611-7-11
work_keys_str_mv AT mccrackenkatherinee shearvsnanotopographyguidedcontrolofgrowthofendothelialcellsonrgdnanoparticlenanowellarrays
AT tranphatl shearvsnanotopographyguidedcontrolofgrowthofendothelialcellsonrgdnanoparticlenanowellarrays
AT youdavidj shearvsnanotopographyguidedcontrolofgrowthofendothelialcellsonrgdnanoparticlenanowellarrays
AT slepianmarvinj shearvsnanotopographyguidedcontrolofgrowthofendothelialcellsonrgdnanoparticlenanowellarrays
AT yoonjeongyeol shearvsnanotopographyguidedcontrolofgrowthofendothelialcellsonrgdnanoparticlenanowellarrays