Cargando…

Patients’ experience and satisfaction with GP led walk-in centres in the UK; a cross sectional study

BACKGROUND: GP led walk-in centres were established in the UK in 2009. Around 150 such clinics were initially planned to open. Their purpose is to provide a primary health care service to complement the urgent care services provided by Emergency Departments (ED), to reduce unnecessary patient attend...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arain, Mubashir, Nicholl, Jon, Campbell, Mike
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3637583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23597132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-142
_version_ 1782267506297143296
author Arain, Mubashir
Nicholl, Jon
Campbell, Mike
author_facet Arain, Mubashir
Nicholl, Jon
Campbell, Mike
author_sort Arain, Mubashir
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: GP led walk-in centres were established in the UK in 2009. Around 150 such clinics were initially planned to open. Their purpose is to provide a primary health care service to complement the urgent care services provided by Emergency Departments (ED), to reduce unnecessary patient attendance at ED, and to increase accessibility of health care services. The objectives of this study were to determine patient satisfaction and experiences with GP led walk-in centres in the UK. METHODS: A survey was conducted in two GP led walk-in centres in the North of England over three weeks during September and October 2011. A self reported, validated questionnaire was used to survey patients presenting at these centres. A short post visit questionnaire was also sent to those who agreed. Ethical approval for the study was obtained from an NHS ethical review committee. RESULTS: Based on a sample of 1030 survey participants (Centre A = 501; Centre B = 529), we found that 93% of patients were either highly or fairly satisfied with the service at centre A and 86% at centre B. The difference between centres was due to the longer reported waiting times which were seen in centre B. There was no difference in satisfaction between first time users and repeat users (P value = 0.8). Roughly 50% (n = 507) of patients reported that their reason for using the walk-in centre was having GP access without an appointment, and 9% (n = 87) reported that their GP surgery was closed. A further 20% of patients (n = 205) reported that they were not able to see their own GP because of their working hours. In the post visit survey (n = 258), nearly all patients reported complying with the advice given (around 90% at both study centres), and most of the patients (86%) reported their problem had resolved a few days later. In addition, 56% of patients at centre B and 58% at centre A reported that they had also visited another NHS service for the same problem, mostly their own GP (66%). CONCLUSIONS: The GP led walk-in centres increased access to GP care and most of the patients were satisfied with the service.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3637583
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36375832013-04-28 Patients’ experience and satisfaction with GP led walk-in centres in the UK; a cross sectional study Arain, Mubashir Nicholl, Jon Campbell, Mike BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: GP led walk-in centres were established in the UK in 2009. Around 150 such clinics were initially planned to open. Their purpose is to provide a primary health care service to complement the urgent care services provided by Emergency Departments (ED), to reduce unnecessary patient attendance at ED, and to increase accessibility of health care services. The objectives of this study were to determine patient satisfaction and experiences with GP led walk-in centres in the UK. METHODS: A survey was conducted in two GP led walk-in centres in the North of England over three weeks during September and October 2011. A self reported, validated questionnaire was used to survey patients presenting at these centres. A short post visit questionnaire was also sent to those who agreed. Ethical approval for the study was obtained from an NHS ethical review committee. RESULTS: Based on a sample of 1030 survey participants (Centre A = 501; Centre B = 529), we found that 93% of patients were either highly or fairly satisfied with the service at centre A and 86% at centre B. The difference between centres was due to the longer reported waiting times which were seen in centre B. There was no difference in satisfaction between first time users and repeat users (P value = 0.8). Roughly 50% (n = 507) of patients reported that their reason for using the walk-in centre was having GP access without an appointment, and 9% (n = 87) reported that their GP surgery was closed. A further 20% of patients (n = 205) reported that they were not able to see their own GP because of their working hours. In the post visit survey (n = 258), nearly all patients reported complying with the advice given (around 90% at both study centres), and most of the patients (86%) reported their problem had resolved a few days later. In addition, 56% of patients at centre B and 58% at centre A reported that they had also visited another NHS service for the same problem, mostly their own GP (66%). CONCLUSIONS: The GP led walk-in centres increased access to GP care and most of the patients were satisfied with the service. BioMed Central 2013-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3637583/ /pubmed/23597132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-142 Text en Copyright © 2013 Arain et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Arain, Mubashir
Nicholl, Jon
Campbell, Mike
Patients’ experience and satisfaction with GP led walk-in centres in the UK; a cross sectional study
title Patients’ experience and satisfaction with GP led walk-in centres in the UK; a cross sectional study
title_full Patients’ experience and satisfaction with GP led walk-in centres in the UK; a cross sectional study
title_fullStr Patients’ experience and satisfaction with GP led walk-in centres in the UK; a cross sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Patients’ experience and satisfaction with GP led walk-in centres in the UK; a cross sectional study
title_short Patients’ experience and satisfaction with GP led walk-in centres in the UK; a cross sectional study
title_sort patients’ experience and satisfaction with gp led walk-in centres in the uk; a cross sectional study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3637583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23597132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-142
work_keys_str_mv AT arainmubashir patientsexperienceandsatisfactionwithgpledwalkincentresintheukacrosssectionalstudy
AT nicholljon patientsexperienceandsatisfactionwithgpledwalkincentresintheukacrosssectionalstudy
AT campbellmike patientsexperienceandsatisfactionwithgpledwalkincentresintheukacrosssectionalstudy