Cargando…
Massively-parallel sequencing of genes on a single chromosome: a comparison of solution hybrid selection and flow sorting
BACKGROUND: Targeted capture, combined with massively-parallel sequencing, is a powerful technique that allows investigation of specific portions of the genome for less cost than whole genome sequencing. Several methods have been developed, and improvements have resulted in commercial products targe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3637801/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23586822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-253 |
_version_ | 1782475781174198272 |
---|---|
author | Teer, Jamie K Johnston, Jennifer J Anzick, Sarah L Pineda, Marbin Stone, Gary Meltzer, Paul S Mullikin, James C Biesecker, Leslie G |
author_facet | Teer, Jamie K Johnston, Jennifer J Anzick, Sarah L Pineda, Marbin Stone, Gary Meltzer, Paul S Mullikin, James C Biesecker, Leslie G |
author_sort | Teer, Jamie K |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Targeted capture, combined with massively-parallel sequencing, is a powerful technique that allows investigation of specific portions of the genome for less cost than whole genome sequencing. Several methods have been developed, and improvements have resulted in commercial products targeting the human or mouse exonic regions (the exome). In some cases it is desirable to custom-target other regions of the genome, either to reduce the amount of sequence that is targeted or to capture regions that are not targeted by commercial kits. It is important to understand the advantages, limitations, and complexity of a given capture method before embarking on a targeted sequencing experiment. RESULTS: We compared two custom targeted capture methods suitable for single chromosome analysis: Solution Hybrid Selection (SHS) and Flow Sorting (FS) of single chromosomes. Both methods can capture targeted material and result in high percentages of genotype identifications across these regions: 59-92% for SHS and 70-79% for FS. FS is amenable to current structural variation detection methods, and variants were detected. Structural variation was also assessed for SHS samples with paired end sequencing, resulting in variant identification. CONCLUSIONS: While both methods can effectively target genomic regions for genotype determination, several considerations make each method appropriate in different circumstances. SHS is well suited for experiments targeting smaller regions in a larger number of samples. FS is well suited when regions of interest cover large regions of a single chromosome. Although whole genome sequencing is becoming less expensive, the sequencing, data storage, and analysis costs make targeted sequencing using SHS or FS a compelling option. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3637801 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36378012013-04-28 Massively-parallel sequencing of genes on a single chromosome: a comparison of solution hybrid selection and flow sorting Teer, Jamie K Johnston, Jennifer J Anzick, Sarah L Pineda, Marbin Stone, Gary Meltzer, Paul S Mullikin, James C Biesecker, Leslie G BMC Genomics Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Targeted capture, combined with massively-parallel sequencing, is a powerful technique that allows investigation of specific portions of the genome for less cost than whole genome sequencing. Several methods have been developed, and improvements have resulted in commercial products targeting the human or mouse exonic regions (the exome). In some cases it is desirable to custom-target other regions of the genome, either to reduce the amount of sequence that is targeted or to capture regions that are not targeted by commercial kits. It is important to understand the advantages, limitations, and complexity of a given capture method before embarking on a targeted sequencing experiment. RESULTS: We compared two custom targeted capture methods suitable for single chromosome analysis: Solution Hybrid Selection (SHS) and Flow Sorting (FS) of single chromosomes. Both methods can capture targeted material and result in high percentages of genotype identifications across these regions: 59-92% for SHS and 70-79% for FS. FS is amenable to current structural variation detection methods, and variants were detected. Structural variation was also assessed for SHS samples with paired end sequencing, resulting in variant identification. CONCLUSIONS: While both methods can effectively target genomic regions for genotype determination, several considerations make each method appropriate in different circumstances. SHS is well suited for experiments targeting smaller regions in a larger number of samples. FS is well suited when regions of interest cover large regions of a single chromosome. Although whole genome sequencing is becoming less expensive, the sequencing, data storage, and analysis costs make targeted sequencing using SHS or FS a compelling option. BioMed Central 2013-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3637801/ /pubmed/23586822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-253 Text en Copyright © 2013 Teer et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Article Teer, Jamie K Johnston, Jennifer J Anzick, Sarah L Pineda, Marbin Stone, Gary Meltzer, Paul S Mullikin, James C Biesecker, Leslie G Massively-parallel sequencing of genes on a single chromosome: a comparison of solution hybrid selection and flow sorting |
title | Massively-parallel sequencing of genes on a single chromosome: a comparison of solution hybrid selection and flow sorting |
title_full | Massively-parallel sequencing of genes on a single chromosome: a comparison of solution hybrid selection and flow sorting |
title_fullStr | Massively-parallel sequencing of genes on a single chromosome: a comparison of solution hybrid selection and flow sorting |
title_full_unstemmed | Massively-parallel sequencing of genes on a single chromosome: a comparison of solution hybrid selection and flow sorting |
title_short | Massively-parallel sequencing of genes on a single chromosome: a comparison of solution hybrid selection and flow sorting |
title_sort | massively-parallel sequencing of genes on a single chromosome: a comparison of solution hybrid selection and flow sorting |
topic | Methodology Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3637801/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23586822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-253 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT teerjamiek massivelyparallelsequencingofgenesonasinglechromosomeacomparisonofsolutionhybridselectionandflowsorting AT johnstonjenniferj massivelyparallelsequencingofgenesonasinglechromosomeacomparisonofsolutionhybridselectionandflowsorting AT anzicksarahl massivelyparallelsequencingofgenesonasinglechromosomeacomparisonofsolutionhybridselectionandflowsorting AT pinedamarbin massivelyparallelsequencingofgenesonasinglechromosomeacomparisonofsolutionhybridselectionandflowsorting AT stonegary massivelyparallelsequencingofgenesonasinglechromosomeacomparisonofsolutionhybridselectionandflowsorting AT meltzerpauls massivelyparallelsequencingofgenesonasinglechromosomeacomparisonofsolutionhybridselectionandflowsorting AT mullikinjamesc massivelyparallelsequencingofgenesonasinglechromosomeacomparisonofsolutionhybridselectionandflowsorting AT bieseckerleslieg massivelyparallelsequencingofgenesonasinglechromosomeacomparisonofsolutionhybridselectionandflowsorting |