Cargando…

The effectiveness of computer reminders for improving quality assessment for point-of-care testing in general practice—a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Computer reminders are increasingly being applied in efforts to improve quality and patient safety. However, research is still needed to establish the effectiveness of different kinds of reminders in various settings. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of computer reminders f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kousgaard, Marius Brostrøm, Siersma, Volkert, Reventlow, Susanne, Ertmann, Ruth, Felding, Peter, Waldorff, Frans Boch
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3637803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23618425
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-47
_version_ 1782475781662834688
author Kousgaard, Marius Brostrøm
Siersma, Volkert
Reventlow, Susanne
Ertmann, Ruth
Felding, Peter
Waldorff, Frans Boch
author_facet Kousgaard, Marius Brostrøm
Siersma, Volkert
Reventlow, Susanne
Ertmann, Ruth
Felding, Peter
Waldorff, Frans Boch
author_sort Kousgaard, Marius Brostrøm
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Computer reminders are increasingly being applied in efforts to improve quality and patient safety. However, research is still needed to establish the effectiveness of different kinds of reminders in various settings. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of computer reminders for improving adherence to a quality assessment scheme for point-of-care testing in general practice. METHOD: The study was conducted as a randomized controlled crossover trial among general practices in the Capital Region of Denmark. The intervention consisted of sending computer reminders (ComRem) to practices not adhering to the guideline recommendations of split testing for hemoglobin and glucose. Practices were randomly allocated into two groups. During the first follow-up period, one of the groups received the ComRem intervention together with the general implementation activities (GIA), while the other group only received the GIA. For the second follow-up period, the intervention was switched between the two groups. Outcomes were measured as split test procedure adherence. RESULTS: A total of 142 practices were randomly allocated to the early intervention group and 144 practices to the late intervention group (the control group in the first follow-up period). In the first intervention period, the mean number of split tests performed in the group receiving ComRem group increased from 1.22 to 3.76 (out of eight possible tests) while the mean number of split tests increased from 1.11 to 2.35 in the group targeted by GIA only (p = 0.0059). After the crossover, a similar effect of reminders was observed. Furthermore, the developments in outcome measures over time showed a strong effect of computer reminders beyond the intervention periods. CONCLUSION: There was a significant effect of computer reminders on adherence to the quality assessment scheme for point-of-care testing. Thus, computer reminders seem to be useful for supporting the implementation of relatively simple procedures for quality and safety. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: http://NCT01152177
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3637803
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36378032013-04-28 The effectiveness of computer reminders for improving quality assessment for point-of-care testing in general practice—a randomized controlled trial Kousgaard, Marius Brostrøm Siersma, Volkert Reventlow, Susanne Ertmann, Ruth Felding, Peter Waldorff, Frans Boch Implement Sci Research BACKGROUND: Computer reminders are increasingly being applied in efforts to improve quality and patient safety. However, research is still needed to establish the effectiveness of different kinds of reminders in various settings. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of computer reminders for improving adherence to a quality assessment scheme for point-of-care testing in general practice. METHOD: The study was conducted as a randomized controlled crossover trial among general practices in the Capital Region of Denmark. The intervention consisted of sending computer reminders (ComRem) to practices not adhering to the guideline recommendations of split testing for hemoglobin and glucose. Practices were randomly allocated into two groups. During the first follow-up period, one of the groups received the ComRem intervention together with the general implementation activities (GIA), while the other group only received the GIA. For the second follow-up period, the intervention was switched between the two groups. Outcomes were measured as split test procedure adherence. RESULTS: A total of 142 practices were randomly allocated to the early intervention group and 144 practices to the late intervention group (the control group in the first follow-up period). In the first intervention period, the mean number of split tests performed in the group receiving ComRem group increased from 1.22 to 3.76 (out of eight possible tests) while the mean number of split tests increased from 1.11 to 2.35 in the group targeted by GIA only (p = 0.0059). After the crossover, a similar effect of reminders was observed. Furthermore, the developments in outcome measures over time showed a strong effect of computer reminders beyond the intervention periods. CONCLUSION: There was a significant effect of computer reminders on adherence to the quality assessment scheme for point-of-care testing. Thus, computer reminders seem to be useful for supporting the implementation of relatively simple procedures for quality and safety. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: http://NCT01152177 BioMed Central 2013-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3637803/ /pubmed/23618425 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-47 Text en Copyright © 2013 Kousgaard et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Kousgaard, Marius Brostrøm
Siersma, Volkert
Reventlow, Susanne
Ertmann, Ruth
Felding, Peter
Waldorff, Frans Boch
The effectiveness of computer reminders for improving quality assessment for point-of-care testing in general practice—a randomized controlled trial
title The effectiveness of computer reminders for improving quality assessment for point-of-care testing in general practice—a randomized controlled trial
title_full The effectiveness of computer reminders for improving quality assessment for point-of-care testing in general practice—a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr The effectiveness of computer reminders for improving quality assessment for point-of-care testing in general practice—a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness of computer reminders for improving quality assessment for point-of-care testing in general practice—a randomized controlled trial
title_short The effectiveness of computer reminders for improving quality assessment for point-of-care testing in general practice—a randomized controlled trial
title_sort effectiveness of computer reminders for improving quality assessment for point-of-care testing in general practice—a randomized controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3637803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23618425
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-47
work_keys_str_mv AT kousgaardmariusbrostrøm theeffectivenessofcomputerremindersforimprovingqualityassessmentforpointofcaretestingingeneralpracticearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT siersmavolkert theeffectivenessofcomputerremindersforimprovingqualityassessmentforpointofcaretestingingeneralpracticearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT reventlowsusanne theeffectivenessofcomputerremindersforimprovingqualityassessmentforpointofcaretestingingeneralpracticearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ertmannruth theeffectivenessofcomputerremindersforimprovingqualityassessmentforpointofcaretestingingeneralpracticearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT feldingpeter theeffectivenessofcomputerremindersforimprovingqualityassessmentforpointofcaretestingingeneralpracticearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT waldorfffransboch theeffectivenessofcomputerremindersforimprovingqualityassessmentforpointofcaretestingingeneralpracticearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kousgaardmariusbrostrøm effectivenessofcomputerremindersforimprovingqualityassessmentforpointofcaretestingingeneralpracticearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT siersmavolkert effectivenessofcomputerremindersforimprovingqualityassessmentforpointofcaretestingingeneralpracticearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT reventlowsusanne effectivenessofcomputerremindersforimprovingqualityassessmentforpointofcaretestingingeneralpracticearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ertmannruth effectivenessofcomputerremindersforimprovingqualityassessmentforpointofcaretestingingeneralpracticearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT feldingpeter effectivenessofcomputerremindersforimprovingqualityassessmentforpointofcaretestingingeneralpracticearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT waldorfffransboch effectivenessofcomputerremindersforimprovingqualityassessmentforpointofcaretestingingeneralpracticearandomizedcontrolledtrial