Cargando…

Optimal functional outcome measures for assessing treatment for Dupuytren’s disease: a systematic review and recommendations for future practice

BACKGROUND: Dupuytren's disease of the hand is a common condition affecting the palmar fascia, resulting in progressive flexion deformities of the digits and hence limitation of hand function. The optimal treatment remains unclear as outcomes studies have used a variety of measures for assessme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ball, Catherine, Pratt, Anna L, Nanchahal, Jagdeep
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3637830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23575442
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-14-131
_version_ 1782475787689000960
author Ball, Catherine
Pratt, Anna L
Nanchahal, Jagdeep
author_facet Ball, Catherine
Pratt, Anna L
Nanchahal, Jagdeep
author_sort Ball, Catherine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Dupuytren's disease of the hand is a common condition affecting the palmar fascia, resulting in progressive flexion deformities of the digits and hence limitation of hand function. The optimal treatment remains unclear as outcomes studies have used a variety of measures for assessment. METHODS: A literature search was performed for all publications describing surgical treatment, percutaneous needle aponeurotomy or collagenase injection for primary or recurrent Dupuytren’s disease where outcomes had been monitored using functional measures. RESULTS: Ninety-one studies met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-two studies reported outcomes using patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) ranging from validated questionnaires to self-reported measures for return to work and self-rated disability. The Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score was the most utilised patient-reported function measure (n=11). Patient satisfaction was reported by eighteen studies but no single method was used consistently. Range of movement was the most frequent physical measure and was reported in all 91 studies. However, the methods of measurement and reporting varied, with seventeen different techniques being used. Other physical measures included grip and pinch strength and sensibility, again with variations in measurement protocols. The mean follow-up time ranged from 2 weeks to 17 years. CONCLUSIONS: There is little consistency in the reporting of outcomes for interventions in patients with Dupuytren’s disease, making it impossible to compare the efficacy of different treatment modalities. Although there are limitations to the existing generic patient reported outcomes measures, a combination of these together with a disease-specific questionnaire, and physical measures of active and passive individual joint Range of movement (ROM), grip and sensibility using standardised protocols should be used for future outcomes studies. As Dupuytren’s disease tends to recur following treatment as well as extend to involve other areas of the hand, follow-up times should be standardised and designed to capture both short and long term outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3637830
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36378302013-04-28 Optimal functional outcome measures for assessing treatment for Dupuytren’s disease: a systematic review and recommendations for future practice Ball, Catherine Pratt, Anna L Nanchahal, Jagdeep BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Dupuytren's disease of the hand is a common condition affecting the palmar fascia, resulting in progressive flexion deformities of the digits and hence limitation of hand function. The optimal treatment remains unclear as outcomes studies have used a variety of measures for assessment. METHODS: A literature search was performed for all publications describing surgical treatment, percutaneous needle aponeurotomy or collagenase injection for primary or recurrent Dupuytren’s disease where outcomes had been monitored using functional measures. RESULTS: Ninety-one studies met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-two studies reported outcomes using patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) ranging from validated questionnaires to self-reported measures for return to work and self-rated disability. The Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score was the most utilised patient-reported function measure (n=11). Patient satisfaction was reported by eighteen studies but no single method was used consistently. Range of movement was the most frequent physical measure and was reported in all 91 studies. However, the methods of measurement and reporting varied, with seventeen different techniques being used. Other physical measures included grip and pinch strength and sensibility, again with variations in measurement protocols. The mean follow-up time ranged from 2 weeks to 17 years. CONCLUSIONS: There is little consistency in the reporting of outcomes for interventions in patients with Dupuytren’s disease, making it impossible to compare the efficacy of different treatment modalities. Although there are limitations to the existing generic patient reported outcomes measures, a combination of these together with a disease-specific questionnaire, and physical measures of active and passive individual joint Range of movement (ROM), grip and sensibility using standardised protocols should be used for future outcomes studies. As Dupuytren’s disease tends to recur following treatment as well as extend to involve other areas of the hand, follow-up times should be standardised and designed to capture both short and long term outcomes. BioMed Central 2013-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3637830/ /pubmed/23575442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-14-131 Text en Copyright © 2013 Ball et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ball, Catherine
Pratt, Anna L
Nanchahal, Jagdeep
Optimal functional outcome measures for assessing treatment for Dupuytren’s disease: a systematic review and recommendations for future practice
title Optimal functional outcome measures for assessing treatment for Dupuytren’s disease: a systematic review and recommendations for future practice
title_full Optimal functional outcome measures for assessing treatment for Dupuytren’s disease: a systematic review and recommendations for future practice
title_fullStr Optimal functional outcome measures for assessing treatment for Dupuytren’s disease: a systematic review and recommendations for future practice
title_full_unstemmed Optimal functional outcome measures for assessing treatment for Dupuytren’s disease: a systematic review and recommendations for future practice
title_short Optimal functional outcome measures for assessing treatment for Dupuytren’s disease: a systematic review and recommendations for future practice
title_sort optimal functional outcome measures for assessing treatment for dupuytren’s disease: a systematic review and recommendations for future practice
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3637830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23575442
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-14-131
work_keys_str_mv AT ballcatherine optimalfunctionaloutcomemeasuresforassessingtreatmentfordupuytrensdiseaseasystematicreviewandrecommendationsforfuturepractice
AT prattannal optimalfunctionaloutcomemeasuresforassessingtreatmentfordupuytrensdiseaseasystematicreviewandrecommendationsforfuturepractice
AT nanchahaljagdeep optimalfunctionaloutcomemeasuresforassessingtreatmentfordupuytrensdiseaseasystematicreviewandrecommendationsforfuturepractice