Cargando…
Optimal functional outcome measures for assessing treatment for Dupuytren’s disease: a systematic review and recommendations for future practice
BACKGROUND: Dupuytren's disease of the hand is a common condition affecting the palmar fascia, resulting in progressive flexion deformities of the digits and hence limitation of hand function. The optimal treatment remains unclear as outcomes studies have used a variety of measures for assessme...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3637830/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23575442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-14-131 |
_version_ | 1782475787689000960 |
---|---|
author | Ball, Catherine Pratt, Anna L Nanchahal, Jagdeep |
author_facet | Ball, Catherine Pratt, Anna L Nanchahal, Jagdeep |
author_sort | Ball, Catherine |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Dupuytren's disease of the hand is a common condition affecting the palmar fascia, resulting in progressive flexion deformities of the digits and hence limitation of hand function. The optimal treatment remains unclear as outcomes studies have used a variety of measures for assessment. METHODS: A literature search was performed for all publications describing surgical treatment, percutaneous needle aponeurotomy or collagenase injection for primary or recurrent Dupuytren’s disease where outcomes had been monitored using functional measures. RESULTS: Ninety-one studies met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-two studies reported outcomes using patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) ranging from validated questionnaires to self-reported measures for return to work and self-rated disability. The Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score was the most utilised patient-reported function measure (n=11). Patient satisfaction was reported by eighteen studies but no single method was used consistently. Range of movement was the most frequent physical measure and was reported in all 91 studies. However, the methods of measurement and reporting varied, with seventeen different techniques being used. Other physical measures included grip and pinch strength and sensibility, again with variations in measurement protocols. The mean follow-up time ranged from 2 weeks to 17 years. CONCLUSIONS: There is little consistency in the reporting of outcomes for interventions in patients with Dupuytren’s disease, making it impossible to compare the efficacy of different treatment modalities. Although there are limitations to the existing generic patient reported outcomes measures, a combination of these together with a disease-specific questionnaire, and physical measures of active and passive individual joint Range of movement (ROM), grip and sensibility using standardised protocols should be used for future outcomes studies. As Dupuytren’s disease tends to recur following treatment as well as extend to involve other areas of the hand, follow-up times should be standardised and designed to capture both short and long term outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3637830 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36378302013-04-28 Optimal functional outcome measures for assessing treatment for Dupuytren’s disease: a systematic review and recommendations for future practice Ball, Catherine Pratt, Anna L Nanchahal, Jagdeep BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Dupuytren's disease of the hand is a common condition affecting the palmar fascia, resulting in progressive flexion deformities of the digits and hence limitation of hand function. The optimal treatment remains unclear as outcomes studies have used a variety of measures for assessment. METHODS: A literature search was performed for all publications describing surgical treatment, percutaneous needle aponeurotomy or collagenase injection for primary or recurrent Dupuytren’s disease where outcomes had been monitored using functional measures. RESULTS: Ninety-one studies met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-two studies reported outcomes using patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) ranging from validated questionnaires to self-reported measures for return to work and self-rated disability. The Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score was the most utilised patient-reported function measure (n=11). Patient satisfaction was reported by eighteen studies but no single method was used consistently. Range of movement was the most frequent physical measure and was reported in all 91 studies. However, the methods of measurement and reporting varied, with seventeen different techniques being used. Other physical measures included grip and pinch strength and sensibility, again with variations in measurement protocols. The mean follow-up time ranged from 2 weeks to 17 years. CONCLUSIONS: There is little consistency in the reporting of outcomes for interventions in patients with Dupuytren’s disease, making it impossible to compare the efficacy of different treatment modalities. Although there are limitations to the existing generic patient reported outcomes measures, a combination of these together with a disease-specific questionnaire, and physical measures of active and passive individual joint Range of movement (ROM), grip and sensibility using standardised protocols should be used for future outcomes studies. As Dupuytren’s disease tends to recur following treatment as well as extend to involve other areas of the hand, follow-up times should be standardised and designed to capture both short and long term outcomes. BioMed Central 2013-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3637830/ /pubmed/23575442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-14-131 Text en Copyright © 2013 Ball et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ball, Catherine Pratt, Anna L Nanchahal, Jagdeep Optimal functional outcome measures for assessing treatment for Dupuytren’s disease: a systematic review and recommendations for future practice |
title | Optimal functional outcome measures for assessing treatment for Dupuytren’s disease: a systematic review and recommendations for future practice |
title_full | Optimal functional outcome measures for assessing treatment for Dupuytren’s disease: a systematic review and recommendations for future practice |
title_fullStr | Optimal functional outcome measures for assessing treatment for Dupuytren’s disease: a systematic review and recommendations for future practice |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimal functional outcome measures for assessing treatment for Dupuytren’s disease: a systematic review and recommendations for future practice |
title_short | Optimal functional outcome measures for assessing treatment for Dupuytren’s disease: a systematic review and recommendations for future practice |
title_sort | optimal functional outcome measures for assessing treatment for dupuytren’s disease: a systematic review and recommendations for future practice |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3637830/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23575442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-14-131 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ballcatherine optimalfunctionaloutcomemeasuresforassessingtreatmentfordupuytrensdiseaseasystematicreviewandrecommendationsforfuturepractice AT prattannal optimalfunctionaloutcomemeasuresforassessingtreatmentfordupuytrensdiseaseasystematicreviewandrecommendationsforfuturepractice AT nanchahaljagdeep optimalfunctionaloutcomemeasuresforassessingtreatmentfordupuytrensdiseaseasystematicreviewandrecommendationsforfuturepractice |