Cargando…

The Manchester–Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ): Development and validation of a summary index score

OBJECTIVES: The Manchester–Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) is a validated 16-item, patient-reported outcome measure for evaluating outcomes of foot or ankle surgery. The original development of the instrument identified three domains. This present study examined whether the three domains could leg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morley, D., Jenkinson, C., Doll, H., Lavis, G., Sharp, R., Cooke, P., Dawson, J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3638305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23673374
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.24.2000147
_version_ 1782475816675835904
author Morley, D.
Jenkinson, C.
Doll, H.
Lavis, G.
Sharp, R.
Cooke, P.
Dawson, J.
author_facet Morley, D.
Jenkinson, C.
Doll, H.
Lavis, G.
Sharp, R.
Cooke, P.
Dawson, J.
author_sort Morley, D.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The Manchester–Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) is a validated 16-item, patient-reported outcome measure for evaluating outcomes of foot or ankle surgery. The original development of the instrument identified three domains. This present study examined whether the three domains could legitimately be summed to provide a single summary index score. METHODS: The MOXFQ and Short-Form (SF)-36 were administered to 671 patients before surgery of the foot or ankle. Data from the three domains of the MOXFQ (pain, walking/standing and social interaction) were subjected to higher order factor analysis. Reliability and validity of the summary index score was assessed. RESULTS: The mean age of the participants was 52.8 years (sd 15.68; 18 to 89). Higher order principle components factor analysis produced one factor, accounting for 74.7% of the variance. The newly derived single index score was found to be internally reliable (α = 0.93) and valid, achieving at least moderate correlations (r ≥ 0.5, p < 0.001) with related (pain/function) domains of the SF-36. CONCLUSIONS: Analyses indicated that data from the MOXFQ can be presented in summary form. The MOXFQ summary index score (MOXFQ-Index) provides an overall indication of the outcomes of foot and ankle surgery. Furthermore, the single index reduces the number of statistical comparisons, and hence the role of chance, when exploring MOXFQ data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3638305
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36383052013-05-15 The Manchester–Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ): Development and validation of a summary index score Morley, D. Jenkinson, C. Doll, H. Lavis, G. Sharp, R. Cooke, P. Dawson, J. Bone Joint Res Foot & Ankle OBJECTIVES: The Manchester–Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) is a validated 16-item, patient-reported outcome measure for evaluating outcomes of foot or ankle surgery. The original development of the instrument identified three domains. This present study examined whether the three domains could legitimately be summed to provide a single summary index score. METHODS: The MOXFQ and Short-Form (SF)-36 were administered to 671 patients before surgery of the foot or ankle. Data from the three domains of the MOXFQ (pain, walking/standing and social interaction) were subjected to higher order factor analysis. Reliability and validity of the summary index score was assessed. RESULTS: The mean age of the participants was 52.8 years (sd 15.68; 18 to 89). Higher order principle components factor analysis produced one factor, accounting for 74.7% of the variance. The newly derived single index score was found to be internally reliable (α = 0.93) and valid, achieving at least moderate correlations (r ≥ 0.5, p < 0.001) with related (pain/function) domains of the SF-36. CONCLUSIONS: Analyses indicated that data from the MOXFQ can be presented in summary form. The MOXFQ summary index score (MOXFQ-Index) provides an overall indication of the outcomes of foot and ankle surgery. Furthermore, the single index reduces the number of statistical comparisons, and hence the role of chance, when exploring MOXFQ data. British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery 2013-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3638305/ /pubmed/23673374 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.24.2000147 Text en ©2013 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery ©2013 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attributions licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, but not for commercial gain, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Foot & Ankle
Morley, D.
Jenkinson, C.
Doll, H.
Lavis, G.
Sharp, R.
Cooke, P.
Dawson, J.
The Manchester–Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ): Development and validation of a summary index score
title The Manchester–Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ): Development and validation of a summary index score
title_full The Manchester–Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ): Development and validation of a summary index score
title_fullStr The Manchester–Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ): Development and validation of a summary index score
title_full_unstemmed The Manchester–Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ): Development and validation of a summary index score
title_short The Manchester–Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ): Development and validation of a summary index score
title_sort manchester–oxford foot questionnaire (moxfq): development and validation of a summary index score
topic Foot & Ankle
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3638305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23673374
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.24.2000147
work_keys_str_mv AT morleyd themanchesteroxfordfootquestionnairemoxfqdevelopmentandvalidationofasummaryindexscore
AT jenkinsonc themanchesteroxfordfootquestionnairemoxfqdevelopmentandvalidationofasummaryindexscore
AT dollh themanchesteroxfordfootquestionnairemoxfqdevelopmentandvalidationofasummaryindexscore
AT lavisg themanchesteroxfordfootquestionnairemoxfqdevelopmentandvalidationofasummaryindexscore
AT sharpr themanchesteroxfordfootquestionnairemoxfqdevelopmentandvalidationofasummaryindexscore
AT cookep themanchesteroxfordfootquestionnairemoxfqdevelopmentandvalidationofasummaryindexscore
AT dawsonj themanchesteroxfordfootquestionnairemoxfqdevelopmentandvalidationofasummaryindexscore
AT morleyd manchesteroxfordfootquestionnairemoxfqdevelopmentandvalidationofasummaryindexscore
AT jenkinsonc manchesteroxfordfootquestionnairemoxfqdevelopmentandvalidationofasummaryindexscore
AT dollh manchesteroxfordfootquestionnairemoxfqdevelopmentandvalidationofasummaryindexscore
AT lavisg manchesteroxfordfootquestionnairemoxfqdevelopmentandvalidationofasummaryindexscore
AT sharpr manchesteroxfordfootquestionnairemoxfqdevelopmentandvalidationofasummaryindexscore
AT cookep manchesteroxfordfootquestionnairemoxfqdevelopmentandvalidationofasummaryindexscore
AT dawsonj manchesteroxfordfootquestionnairemoxfqdevelopmentandvalidationofasummaryindexscore