Cargando…

Influence of temperature on measurements of the CO(2) compensation point: differences between the Laisk and O(2)-exchange methods

The CO(2) compensation point in the absence of day respiration (Γ*) is a key parameter for modelling leaf CO(2) exchange. Γ* links the kinetics of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase-oxygenase (Rubisco) with the stoichiometry of CO(2) released per Rubisco oxygenation from photorespiration (α), two...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Walker, Berkley J., Cousins, Asaph B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3638825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23630324
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ert058
_version_ 1782475876199301120
author Walker, Berkley J.
Cousins, Asaph B.
author_facet Walker, Berkley J.
Cousins, Asaph B.
author_sort Walker, Berkley J.
collection PubMed
description The CO(2) compensation point in the absence of day respiration (Γ*) is a key parameter for modelling leaf CO(2) exchange. Γ* links the kinetics of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase-oxygenase (Rubisco) with the stoichiometry of CO(2) released per Rubisco oxygenation from photorespiration (α), two essential components of biochemical models of photosynthesis. There are two main gas-exchange methods for measuring Γ*: (i) the Laisk method, which requires estimates of mesophyll conductance to CO(2) (g (m)) and (ii) measurements of O(2) isotope exchange, which assume constant values of α and a fixed stoichiometry between O(2) uptake and Rubisco oxygenation. In this study, the temperature response of Γ* measured using the Laisk and O(2)-exchange methods was compared under ambient (25 °C) and elevated (35 °C) temperatures to determine whether both methods yielded similar results. Previously published temperature responses of Γ* estimated with the Laisk and O(2)-exchange methods in Nicotiana tabacum demonstrated that the Laisk-derived model of Γ* was more sensitive to temperature compared with the O(2)-exchange model. Measurements in Arabidopsis thaliana indicated that the Laisk and O(2)-exchange methods produced similar Γ* at 25 °C; however, Γ* values from O(2) exchange were lower at 35 °C compared with the Laisk method. Compared with a photorespiratory mutant (pmdh1pmdh2hpr) with increased α, wild-type (WT) plants had lower Laisk values of Γ* at 25 °C but were not significantly different at 35 °C. These differences between Laisk and O(2) exchange values of Γ* at 35 °C could be explained by temperature sensitivity of α in WT and/or errors in the assumptions of O(2) exchange. The differences between Γ* measured using the Laisk and O(2)-exchange method with temperature demonstrate that assumptions used to measure Γ*, and possibly the species-specific validity of these assumptions, need to be considered when modelling the temperature response of photosynthesis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3638825
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36388252014-04-01 Influence of temperature on measurements of the CO(2) compensation point: differences between the Laisk and O(2)-exchange methods Walker, Berkley J. Cousins, Asaph B. J Exp Bot Research Paper The CO(2) compensation point in the absence of day respiration (Γ*) is a key parameter for modelling leaf CO(2) exchange. Γ* links the kinetics of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase-oxygenase (Rubisco) with the stoichiometry of CO(2) released per Rubisco oxygenation from photorespiration (α), two essential components of biochemical models of photosynthesis. There are two main gas-exchange methods for measuring Γ*: (i) the Laisk method, which requires estimates of mesophyll conductance to CO(2) (g (m)) and (ii) measurements of O(2) isotope exchange, which assume constant values of α and a fixed stoichiometry between O(2) uptake and Rubisco oxygenation. In this study, the temperature response of Γ* measured using the Laisk and O(2)-exchange methods was compared under ambient (25 °C) and elevated (35 °C) temperatures to determine whether both methods yielded similar results. Previously published temperature responses of Γ* estimated with the Laisk and O(2)-exchange methods in Nicotiana tabacum demonstrated that the Laisk-derived model of Γ* was more sensitive to temperature compared with the O(2)-exchange model. Measurements in Arabidopsis thaliana indicated that the Laisk and O(2)-exchange methods produced similar Γ* at 25 °C; however, Γ* values from O(2) exchange were lower at 35 °C compared with the Laisk method. Compared with a photorespiratory mutant (pmdh1pmdh2hpr) with increased α, wild-type (WT) plants had lower Laisk values of Γ* at 25 °C but were not significantly different at 35 °C. These differences between Laisk and O(2) exchange values of Γ* at 35 °C could be explained by temperature sensitivity of α in WT and/or errors in the assumptions of O(2) exchange. The differences between Γ* measured using the Laisk and O(2)-exchange method with temperature demonstrate that assumptions used to measure Γ*, and possibly the species-specific validity of these assumptions, need to be considered when modelling the temperature response of photosynthesis. Oxford University Press 2013-04 2013-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3638825/ /pubmed/23630324 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ert058 Text en © The Author [2013]. Published by Oxford University Press [on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology]. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Research Paper
Walker, Berkley J.
Cousins, Asaph B.
Influence of temperature on measurements of the CO(2) compensation point: differences between the Laisk and O(2)-exchange methods
title Influence of temperature on measurements of the CO(2) compensation point: differences between the Laisk and O(2)-exchange methods
title_full Influence of temperature on measurements of the CO(2) compensation point: differences between the Laisk and O(2)-exchange methods
title_fullStr Influence of temperature on measurements of the CO(2) compensation point: differences between the Laisk and O(2)-exchange methods
title_full_unstemmed Influence of temperature on measurements of the CO(2) compensation point: differences between the Laisk and O(2)-exchange methods
title_short Influence of temperature on measurements of the CO(2) compensation point: differences between the Laisk and O(2)-exchange methods
title_sort influence of temperature on measurements of the co(2) compensation point: differences between the laisk and o(2)-exchange methods
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3638825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23630324
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ert058
work_keys_str_mv AT walkerberkleyj influenceoftemperatureonmeasurementsoftheco2compensationpointdifferencesbetweenthelaiskando2exchangemethods
AT cousinsasaphb influenceoftemperatureonmeasurementsoftheco2compensationpointdifferencesbetweenthelaiskando2exchangemethods