Cargando…
Influence of temperature on measurements of the CO(2) compensation point: differences between the Laisk and O(2)-exchange methods
The CO(2) compensation point in the absence of day respiration (Γ*) is a key parameter for modelling leaf CO(2) exchange. Γ* links the kinetics of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase-oxygenase (Rubisco) with the stoichiometry of CO(2) released per Rubisco oxygenation from photorespiration (α), two...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3638825/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23630324 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ert058 |
_version_ | 1782475876199301120 |
---|---|
author | Walker, Berkley J. Cousins, Asaph B. |
author_facet | Walker, Berkley J. Cousins, Asaph B. |
author_sort | Walker, Berkley J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The CO(2) compensation point in the absence of day respiration (Γ*) is a key parameter for modelling leaf CO(2) exchange. Γ* links the kinetics of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase-oxygenase (Rubisco) with the stoichiometry of CO(2) released per Rubisco oxygenation from photorespiration (α), two essential components of biochemical models of photosynthesis. There are two main gas-exchange methods for measuring Γ*: (i) the Laisk method, which requires estimates of mesophyll conductance to CO(2) (g (m)) and (ii) measurements of O(2) isotope exchange, which assume constant values of α and a fixed stoichiometry between O(2) uptake and Rubisco oxygenation. In this study, the temperature response of Γ* measured using the Laisk and O(2)-exchange methods was compared under ambient (25 °C) and elevated (35 °C) temperatures to determine whether both methods yielded similar results. Previously published temperature responses of Γ* estimated with the Laisk and O(2)-exchange methods in Nicotiana tabacum demonstrated that the Laisk-derived model of Γ* was more sensitive to temperature compared with the O(2)-exchange model. Measurements in Arabidopsis thaliana indicated that the Laisk and O(2)-exchange methods produced similar Γ* at 25 °C; however, Γ* values from O(2) exchange were lower at 35 °C compared with the Laisk method. Compared with a photorespiratory mutant (pmdh1pmdh2hpr) with increased α, wild-type (WT) plants had lower Laisk values of Γ* at 25 °C but were not significantly different at 35 °C. These differences between Laisk and O(2) exchange values of Γ* at 35 °C could be explained by temperature sensitivity of α in WT and/or errors in the assumptions of O(2) exchange. The differences between Γ* measured using the Laisk and O(2)-exchange method with temperature demonstrate that assumptions used to measure Γ*, and possibly the species-specific validity of these assumptions, need to be considered when modelling the temperature response of photosynthesis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3638825 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36388252014-04-01 Influence of temperature on measurements of the CO(2) compensation point: differences between the Laisk and O(2)-exchange methods Walker, Berkley J. Cousins, Asaph B. J Exp Bot Research Paper The CO(2) compensation point in the absence of day respiration (Γ*) is a key parameter for modelling leaf CO(2) exchange. Γ* links the kinetics of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase-oxygenase (Rubisco) with the stoichiometry of CO(2) released per Rubisco oxygenation from photorespiration (α), two essential components of biochemical models of photosynthesis. There are two main gas-exchange methods for measuring Γ*: (i) the Laisk method, which requires estimates of mesophyll conductance to CO(2) (g (m)) and (ii) measurements of O(2) isotope exchange, which assume constant values of α and a fixed stoichiometry between O(2) uptake and Rubisco oxygenation. In this study, the temperature response of Γ* measured using the Laisk and O(2)-exchange methods was compared under ambient (25 °C) and elevated (35 °C) temperatures to determine whether both methods yielded similar results. Previously published temperature responses of Γ* estimated with the Laisk and O(2)-exchange methods in Nicotiana tabacum demonstrated that the Laisk-derived model of Γ* was more sensitive to temperature compared with the O(2)-exchange model. Measurements in Arabidopsis thaliana indicated that the Laisk and O(2)-exchange methods produced similar Γ* at 25 °C; however, Γ* values from O(2) exchange were lower at 35 °C compared with the Laisk method. Compared with a photorespiratory mutant (pmdh1pmdh2hpr) with increased α, wild-type (WT) plants had lower Laisk values of Γ* at 25 °C but were not significantly different at 35 °C. These differences between Laisk and O(2) exchange values of Γ* at 35 °C could be explained by temperature sensitivity of α in WT and/or errors in the assumptions of O(2) exchange. The differences between Γ* measured using the Laisk and O(2)-exchange method with temperature demonstrate that assumptions used to measure Γ*, and possibly the species-specific validity of these assumptions, need to be considered when modelling the temperature response of photosynthesis. Oxford University Press 2013-04 2013-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3638825/ /pubmed/23630324 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ert058 Text en © The Author [2013]. Published by Oxford University Press [on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology]. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Walker, Berkley J. Cousins, Asaph B. Influence of temperature on measurements of the CO(2) compensation point: differences between the Laisk and O(2)-exchange methods |
title | Influence of temperature on measurements of the CO(2) compensation point: differences between the Laisk and O(2)-exchange methods |
title_full | Influence of temperature on measurements of the CO(2) compensation point: differences between the Laisk and O(2)-exchange methods |
title_fullStr | Influence of temperature on measurements of the CO(2) compensation point: differences between the Laisk and O(2)-exchange methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of temperature on measurements of the CO(2) compensation point: differences between the Laisk and O(2)-exchange methods |
title_short | Influence of temperature on measurements of the CO(2) compensation point: differences between the Laisk and O(2)-exchange methods |
title_sort | influence of temperature on measurements of the co(2) compensation point: differences between the laisk and o(2)-exchange methods |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3638825/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23630324 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ert058 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT walkerberkleyj influenceoftemperatureonmeasurementsoftheco2compensationpointdifferencesbetweenthelaiskando2exchangemethods AT cousinsasaphb influenceoftemperatureonmeasurementsoftheco2compensationpointdifferencesbetweenthelaiskando2exchangemethods |