Cargando…
Ten-year results of quality assurance in radiotherapy chart round
BACKGROUND: The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists (RANZCR) initiated a unique instrument to audit the quality of patient notes and radiotherapy prescriptions. We present our experience collected over ten years from the use of the RANZCR audit instrument. METHODS: In this study...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3639063/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23617328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-148 |
_version_ | 1782475890201985024 |
---|---|
author | Taghavi Bayat, Bardia Gill, Suki Siva, Shankar Tai, Keen Hun Joon, Michael Lim Foroudi, Farshad |
author_facet | Taghavi Bayat, Bardia Gill, Suki Siva, Shankar Tai, Keen Hun Joon, Michael Lim Foroudi, Farshad |
author_sort | Taghavi Bayat, Bardia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists (RANZCR) initiated a unique instrument to audit the quality of patient notes and radiotherapy prescriptions. We present our experience collected over ten years from the use of the RANZCR audit instrument. METHODS: In this study, the results of data collected prospectively from January 1999 to June 2009 through the audit instrument were assessed. Radiotherapy chart rounds were held weekly in the uro-oncology tumour stream and real time feedback was provided. Electronic medical records were retrospectively assessed in September 2009 to see if any omissions were subsequently corrected. RESULTS: In total 2597 patients were audited. One hundred and thirty seven (5%) patients had one hundred and ninety nine omissions in documentation or radiotherapy prescription. In 79% of chart rounds no omissions were found at all, in 12% of chart rounds one omission was found and in 9% of chart rounds two or more omissions were found. Out of 199 omissions, 95% were of record keeping and 2% were omissions in the treatment prescription. Of omissions, 152 (76%) were unfiled investigation results of which 77 (51%) were subsequently corrected. CONCLUSIONS: Real-time audit with feedback is an effective tool in assessing the standards of radiotherapy documentation in our department, and also probably contributed to the high level of attentiveness. A large proportion of omissions were investigation results, which highlights the need for an improved system of retrieval of investigation results in the radiation oncology department. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3639063 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36390632013-04-30 Ten-year results of quality assurance in radiotherapy chart round Taghavi Bayat, Bardia Gill, Suki Siva, Shankar Tai, Keen Hun Joon, Michael Lim Foroudi, Farshad BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists (RANZCR) initiated a unique instrument to audit the quality of patient notes and radiotherapy prescriptions. We present our experience collected over ten years from the use of the RANZCR audit instrument. METHODS: In this study, the results of data collected prospectively from January 1999 to June 2009 through the audit instrument were assessed. Radiotherapy chart rounds were held weekly in the uro-oncology tumour stream and real time feedback was provided. Electronic medical records were retrospectively assessed in September 2009 to see if any omissions were subsequently corrected. RESULTS: In total 2597 patients were audited. One hundred and thirty seven (5%) patients had one hundred and ninety nine omissions in documentation or radiotherapy prescription. In 79% of chart rounds no omissions were found at all, in 12% of chart rounds one omission was found and in 9% of chart rounds two or more omissions were found. Out of 199 omissions, 95% were of record keeping and 2% were omissions in the treatment prescription. Of omissions, 152 (76%) were unfiled investigation results of which 77 (51%) were subsequently corrected. CONCLUSIONS: Real-time audit with feedback is an effective tool in assessing the standards of radiotherapy documentation in our department, and also probably contributed to the high level of attentiveness. A large proportion of omissions were investigation results, which highlights the need for an improved system of retrieval of investigation results in the radiation oncology department. BioMed Central 2013-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3639063/ /pubmed/23617328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-148 Text en Copyright © 2013 Taghavi Bayat et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Taghavi Bayat, Bardia Gill, Suki Siva, Shankar Tai, Keen Hun Joon, Michael Lim Foroudi, Farshad Ten-year results of quality assurance in radiotherapy chart round |
title | Ten-year results of quality assurance in radiotherapy chart round |
title_full | Ten-year results of quality assurance in radiotherapy chart round |
title_fullStr | Ten-year results of quality assurance in radiotherapy chart round |
title_full_unstemmed | Ten-year results of quality assurance in radiotherapy chart round |
title_short | Ten-year results of quality assurance in radiotherapy chart round |
title_sort | ten-year results of quality assurance in radiotherapy chart round |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3639063/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23617328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-148 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT taghavibayatbardia tenyearresultsofqualityassuranceinradiotherapychartround AT gillsuki tenyearresultsofqualityassuranceinradiotherapychartround AT sivashankar tenyearresultsofqualityassuranceinradiotherapychartround AT taikeenhun tenyearresultsofqualityassuranceinradiotherapychartround AT joonmichaellim tenyearresultsofqualityassuranceinradiotherapychartround AT foroudifarshad tenyearresultsofqualityassuranceinradiotherapychartround |