Cargando…

Stentless aortic valve replacement in the young patient: long-term results

BACKGROUND: Stentless aortic valve replacement (SAVR) became a common surgical procedure to treat aortic valve disease, as it offers larger orifice area and improved hemodynamics. The aim of our single-centre retrospective study was to assess long term results of first generation stentless aortic va...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Christ, Torsten, Grubitzsch, Herko, Claus, Benjamin, Konertz, Wolfgang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3639088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23566631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-8090-8-68
_version_ 1782475895611588608
author Christ, Torsten
Grubitzsch, Herko
Claus, Benjamin
Konertz, Wolfgang
author_facet Christ, Torsten
Grubitzsch, Herko
Claus, Benjamin
Konertz, Wolfgang
author_sort Christ, Torsten
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Stentless aortic valve replacement (SAVR) became a common surgical procedure to treat aortic valve disease, as it offers larger orifice area and improved hemodynamics. The aim of our single-centre retrospective study was to assess long term results of first generation stentless aortic valves in young patients, where mechanical prostheses are considered first line therapy. METHODS: From 1993 to 2001, 188 (149 male and 39 female) patients (≤60 years) underwent SAVR. Indications were in 63.3% stenosis or mixed lesions and in 36.7% isolated regurgitation. Mean age of patients at surgery was 53.1 ± 7.1 years. Associated procedures were performed in 60 patients (31.9%). Follow-up data were acquired through telephone interviews. Follow-up was 90.4% complete at a mean of 8.8 ± 4.7 years. Total follow-up was 1657.6 patient-years with a maximum of 17 years. RESULTS: Overall hospital mortality was 3.2% (2.5% for isolated SAVR). Overall actuarial survival-rate at 10/15 years and freedom from reoperation at 10/14 years were 73.0% ± 3.5%/ 55.8% ± 5.4% and 81.0% ± 3.4%/ 58.0% ± 7.5%, respectively. For isolated SAVR, actuarial survival at 10/15 years and freedom from reoperation at 10/14 years were 70.1% ± 4.4%/ 64.1% ± 4.8% and 83.1% ± 4.0%/ 52.9% ± 9.0%, respectively. Reoperation was performed in 42 patients (22.3%) due to structural valve deterioration and endocarditis. Age (≤50 years) and associated procedures did not significantly lower survival and freedom from reoperation, however, small prosthesis sizes (≤25 mm) did. CONCLUSION: In patients aged 60 and younger, SAVR provides reliable long-term results especially for larger aortic valves.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3639088
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36390882013-04-30 Stentless aortic valve replacement in the young patient: long-term results Christ, Torsten Grubitzsch, Herko Claus, Benjamin Konertz, Wolfgang J Cardiothorac Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Stentless aortic valve replacement (SAVR) became a common surgical procedure to treat aortic valve disease, as it offers larger orifice area and improved hemodynamics. The aim of our single-centre retrospective study was to assess long term results of first generation stentless aortic valves in young patients, where mechanical prostheses are considered first line therapy. METHODS: From 1993 to 2001, 188 (149 male and 39 female) patients (≤60 years) underwent SAVR. Indications were in 63.3% stenosis or mixed lesions and in 36.7% isolated regurgitation. Mean age of patients at surgery was 53.1 ± 7.1 years. Associated procedures were performed in 60 patients (31.9%). Follow-up data were acquired through telephone interviews. Follow-up was 90.4% complete at a mean of 8.8 ± 4.7 years. Total follow-up was 1657.6 patient-years with a maximum of 17 years. RESULTS: Overall hospital mortality was 3.2% (2.5% for isolated SAVR). Overall actuarial survival-rate at 10/15 years and freedom from reoperation at 10/14 years were 73.0% ± 3.5%/ 55.8% ± 5.4% and 81.0% ± 3.4%/ 58.0% ± 7.5%, respectively. For isolated SAVR, actuarial survival at 10/15 years and freedom from reoperation at 10/14 years were 70.1% ± 4.4%/ 64.1% ± 4.8% and 83.1% ± 4.0%/ 52.9% ± 9.0%, respectively. Reoperation was performed in 42 patients (22.3%) due to structural valve deterioration and endocarditis. Age (≤50 years) and associated procedures did not significantly lower survival and freedom from reoperation, however, small prosthesis sizes (≤25 mm) did. CONCLUSION: In patients aged 60 and younger, SAVR provides reliable long-term results especially for larger aortic valves. BioMed Central 2013-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3639088/ /pubmed/23566631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-8090-8-68 Text en Copyright © 2013 Christ et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Christ, Torsten
Grubitzsch, Herko
Claus, Benjamin
Konertz, Wolfgang
Stentless aortic valve replacement in the young patient: long-term results
title Stentless aortic valve replacement in the young patient: long-term results
title_full Stentless aortic valve replacement in the young patient: long-term results
title_fullStr Stentless aortic valve replacement in the young patient: long-term results
title_full_unstemmed Stentless aortic valve replacement in the young patient: long-term results
title_short Stentless aortic valve replacement in the young patient: long-term results
title_sort stentless aortic valve replacement in the young patient: long-term results
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3639088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23566631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-8090-8-68
work_keys_str_mv AT christtorsten stentlessaorticvalvereplacementintheyoungpatientlongtermresults
AT grubitzschherko stentlessaorticvalvereplacementintheyoungpatientlongtermresults
AT clausbenjamin stentlessaorticvalvereplacementintheyoungpatientlongtermresults
AT konertzwolfgang stentlessaorticvalvereplacementintheyoungpatientlongtermresults