Cargando…

Effect of antimicrobial growth promoter administration on the intestinal microbiota of beef cattle

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial growth promoters (AGPs) are antimicrobial agents administered to livestock in feed for prolonged periods to enhance feed efficiency. Beef cattle are primarily finished in confined feeding operations in Canada and the USA, and the administration of AGPs such as chlortetracyc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reti, Kristen L, Thomas, Matthew C, Yanke, L Jay, Selinger, L Brent, Inglis, G Douglas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3639104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23578222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-4749-5-8
_version_ 1782475898865319936
author Reti, Kristen L
Thomas, Matthew C
Yanke, L Jay
Selinger, L Brent
Inglis, G Douglas
author_facet Reti, Kristen L
Thomas, Matthew C
Yanke, L Jay
Selinger, L Brent
Inglis, G Douglas
author_sort Reti, Kristen L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial growth promoters (AGPs) are antimicrobial agents administered to livestock in feed for prolonged periods to enhance feed efficiency. Beef cattle are primarily finished in confined feeding operations in Canada and the USA, and the administration of AGPs such as chlortetracycline and sulfamethazine (Aureo S-700 G) is the standard. The impacts of AGPs on the intestinal microbiota of beef cattle are currently uncertain; it is documented that AGPs administered to beef cattle pass through the rumen and enter the intestine. To ascertain the impacts of Aureo S-700 G on the small and large intestinal microbiota of beef cattle (mucosa-associated and within digesta), terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) analysis and quantitative PCR (qPCR) for total bacteria were applied. Beef cattle were maintained in an experimental feedlot (five replicate pens per treatment), and AGP treatment cattle were administered Aureo S-700 G in feed, whereas control cattle were administered no antimicrobials. As the intestinal microbiota of beef cattle has not been extensively examined, clone library analysis was applied to ascertain the primary bacterial constituents of the intestinal microbiota. RESULTS: Comparative T-RFLP and qPCR analysis (n = 122 samples) revealed that bacterial community fingerprints and bacterial load within digesta differed from those associated with mucosa. However, the administration of Aureo S-700 G did not affect bacterial community fingerprints or bacterial load within the small and large intestine relative to control cattle. Analysis of >1500 near full length 16S rDNA clones revealed considerably greater bacterial diversity in the large relative to the small intestine of beef cattle. Mucosa-associated bacterial communities in the jejunum were dominated by Proteobacteria, and differed conspicuously from those in the ileum and large intestine. Although the ileum contained bacterial clones that were common to the jejunum as well as the cecum, Firmicutes clones associated with mucosa dominated in the ileum, cecum, and descending colon. In the descending colon, clone library analysis did not reveal a difference in the richness or diversity of bacterial communities within digesta relative to those associated with mucosa. However, T-RFLP analysis indicated a significant difference in T-RF relative abundance (i.e. difference in relative taxon abundance) between mucosa-associated and digesta communities attributed in part to the differential abundance of Bacteriodes, Alistipes, Oscillibacter, and unclassified Clostridiales. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that there was no significant difference in the composition of the predominant intestinal bacteria constituents within animals administered Aureo S-700 G and those not administered AGPs after a 28 day withdrawal period.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3639104
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36391042013-04-30 Effect of antimicrobial growth promoter administration on the intestinal microbiota of beef cattle Reti, Kristen L Thomas, Matthew C Yanke, L Jay Selinger, L Brent Inglis, G Douglas Gut Pathog Research BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial growth promoters (AGPs) are antimicrobial agents administered to livestock in feed for prolonged periods to enhance feed efficiency. Beef cattle are primarily finished in confined feeding operations in Canada and the USA, and the administration of AGPs such as chlortetracycline and sulfamethazine (Aureo S-700 G) is the standard. The impacts of AGPs on the intestinal microbiota of beef cattle are currently uncertain; it is documented that AGPs administered to beef cattle pass through the rumen and enter the intestine. To ascertain the impacts of Aureo S-700 G on the small and large intestinal microbiota of beef cattle (mucosa-associated and within digesta), terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) analysis and quantitative PCR (qPCR) for total bacteria were applied. Beef cattle were maintained in an experimental feedlot (five replicate pens per treatment), and AGP treatment cattle were administered Aureo S-700 G in feed, whereas control cattle were administered no antimicrobials. As the intestinal microbiota of beef cattle has not been extensively examined, clone library analysis was applied to ascertain the primary bacterial constituents of the intestinal microbiota. RESULTS: Comparative T-RFLP and qPCR analysis (n = 122 samples) revealed that bacterial community fingerprints and bacterial load within digesta differed from those associated with mucosa. However, the administration of Aureo S-700 G did not affect bacterial community fingerprints or bacterial load within the small and large intestine relative to control cattle. Analysis of >1500 near full length 16S rDNA clones revealed considerably greater bacterial diversity in the large relative to the small intestine of beef cattle. Mucosa-associated bacterial communities in the jejunum were dominated by Proteobacteria, and differed conspicuously from those in the ileum and large intestine. Although the ileum contained bacterial clones that were common to the jejunum as well as the cecum, Firmicutes clones associated with mucosa dominated in the ileum, cecum, and descending colon. In the descending colon, clone library analysis did not reveal a difference in the richness or diversity of bacterial communities within digesta relative to those associated with mucosa. However, T-RFLP analysis indicated a significant difference in T-RF relative abundance (i.e. difference in relative taxon abundance) between mucosa-associated and digesta communities attributed in part to the differential abundance of Bacteriodes, Alistipes, Oscillibacter, and unclassified Clostridiales. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that there was no significant difference in the composition of the predominant intestinal bacteria constituents within animals administered Aureo S-700 G and those not administered AGPs after a 28 day withdrawal period. BioMed Central 2013-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3639104/ /pubmed/23578222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-4749-5-8 Text en Copyright © 2013 Reti et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Reti, Kristen L
Thomas, Matthew C
Yanke, L Jay
Selinger, L Brent
Inglis, G Douglas
Effect of antimicrobial growth promoter administration on the intestinal microbiota of beef cattle
title Effect of antimicrobial growth promoter administration on the intestinal microbiota of beef cattle
title_full Effect of antimicrobial growth promoter administration on the intestinal microbiota of beef cattle
title_fullStr Effect of antimicrobial growth promoter administration on the intestinal microbiota of beef cattle
title_full_unstemmed Effect of antimicrobial growth promoter administration on the intestinal microbiota of beef cattle
title_short Effect of antimicrobial growth promoter administration on the intestinal microbiota of beef cattle
title_sort effect of antimicrobial growth promoter administration on the intestinal microbiota of beef cattle
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3639104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23578222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-4749-5-8
work_keys_str_mv AT retikristenl effectofantimicrobialgrowthpromoteradministrationontheintestinalmicrobiotaofbeefcattle
AT thomasmatthewc effectofantimicrobialgrowthpromoteradministrationontheintestinalmicrobiotaofbeefcattle
AT yankeljay effectofantimicrobialgrowthpromoteradministrationontheintestinalmicrobiotaofbeefcattle
AT selingerlbrent effectofantimicrobialgrowthpromoteradministrationontheintestinalmicrobiotaofbeefcattle
AT inglisgdouglas effectofantimicrobialgrowthpromoteradministrationontheintestinalmicrobiotaofbeefcattle