Cargando…

Reliability and validity of the Microsoft Kinect for evaluating static foot posture

BACKGROUND: The evaluation of foot posture in a clinical setting is useful to screen for potential injury, however disagreement remains as to which method has the greatest clinical utility. An inexpensive and widely available imaging system, the Microsoft Kinect™, may possess the characteristics to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mentiplay, Benjamin F, Clark, Ross A, Mullins, Alexandra, Bryant, Adam L, Bartold, Simon, Paterson, Kade
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3639226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23566934
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-6-14
_version_ 1782475922893438976
author Mentiplay, Benjamin F
Clark, Ross A
Mullins, Alexandra
Bryant, Adam L
Bartold, Simon
Paterson, Kade
author_facet Mentiplay, Benjamin F
Clark, Ross A
Mullins, Alexandra
Bryant, Adam L
Bartold, Simon
Paterson, Kade
author_sort Mentiplay, Benjamin F
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The evaluation of foot posture in a clinical setting is useful to screen for potential injury, however disagreement remains as to which method has the greatest clinical utility. An inexpensive and widely available imaging system, the Microsoft Kinect™, may possess the characteristics to objectively evaluate static foot posture in a clinical setting with high accuracy. The aim of this study was to assess the intra-rater reliability and validity of this system for assessing static foot posture. METHODS: Three measures were used to assess static foot posture; traditional visual observation using the Foot Posture Index (FPI), a 3D motion analysis (3DMA) system and software designed to collect and analyse image and depth data from the Kinect. Spearman’s rho was used to assess intra-rater reliability and concurrent validity of the Kinect to evaluate foot posture, and a linear regression was used to examine the ability of the Kinect to predict total visual FPI score. RESULTS: The Kinect demonstrated moderate to good intra-rater reliability for four FPI items of foot posture (ρ = 0.62 to 0.78) and moderate to good correlations with the 3DMA system for four items of foot posture (ρ = 0.51 to 0.85). In contrast, intra-rater reliability of visual FPI items was poor to moderate (ρ = 0.17 to 0.63), and correlations with the Kinect and 3DMA systems were poor (absolute ρ = 0.01 to 0.44). Kinect FPI items with moderate to good reliability predicted 61% of the variance in total visual FPI score. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of the foot posture items derived using the Kinect were more reliable than the traditional visual assessment of FPI, and were valid when compared to a 3DMA system. Individual foot posture items recorded using the Kinect were also shown to predict a moderate degree of variance in the total visual FPI score. Combined, these results support the future potential of the Kinect to accurately evaluate static foot posture in a clinical setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3639226
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36392262013-04-30 Reliability and validity of the Microsoft Kinect for evaluating static foot posture Mentiplay, Benjamin F Clark, Ross A Mullins, Alexandra Bryant, Adam L Bartold, Simon Paterson, Kade J Foot Ankle Res Research BACKGROUND: The evaluation of foot posture in a clinical setting is useful to screen for potential injury, however disagreement remains as to which method has the greatest clinical utility. An inexpensive and widely available imaging system, the Microsoft Kinect™, may possess the characteristics to objectively evaluate static foot posture in a clinical setting with high accuracy. The aim of this study was to assess the intra-rater reliability and validity of this system for assessing static foot posture. METHODS: Three measures were used to assess static foot posture; traditional visual observation using the Foot Posture Index (FPI), a 3D motion analysis (3DMA) system and software designed to collect and analyse image and depth data from the Kinect. Spearman’s rho was used to assess intra-rater reliability and concurrent validity of the Kinect to evaluate foot posture, and a linear regression was used to examine the ability of the Kinect to predict total visual FPI score. RESULTS: The Kinect demonstrated moderate to good intra-rater reliability for four FPI items of foot posture (ρ = 0.62 to 0.78) and moderate to good correlations with the 3DMA system for four items of foot posture (ρ = 0.51 to 0.85). In contrast, intra-rater reliability of visual FPI items was poor to moderate (ρ = 0.17 to 0.63), and correlations with the Kinect and 3DMA systems were poor (absolute ρ = 0.01 to 0.44). Kinect FPI items with moderate to good reliability predicted 61% of the variance in total visual FPI score. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of the foot posture items derived using the Kinect were more reliable than the traditional visual assessment of FPI, and were valid when compared to a 3DMA system. Individual foot posture items recorded using the Kinect were also shown to predict a moderate degree of variance in the total visual FPI score. Combined, these results support the future potential of the Kinect to accurately evaluate static foot posture in a clinical setting. BioMed Central 2013-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3639226/ /pubmed/23566934 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-6-14 Text en Copyright © 2013 Mentiplay et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Mentiplay, Benjamin F
Clark, Ross A
Mullins, Alexandra
Bryant, Adam L
Bartold, Simon
Paterson, Kade
Reliability and validity of the Microsoft Kinect for evaluating static foot posture
title Reliability and validity of the Microsoft Kinect for evaluating static foot posture
title_full Reliability and validity of the Microsoft Kinect for evaluating static foot posture
title_fullStr Reliability and validity of the Microsoft Kinect for evaluating static foot posture
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and validity of the Microsoft Kinect for evaluating static foot posture
title_short Reliability and validity of the Microsoft Kinect for evaluating static foot posture
title_sort reliability and validity of the microsoft kinect for evaluating static foot posture
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3639226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23566934
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-6-14
work_keys_str_mv AT mentiplaybenjaminf reliabilityandvalidityofthemicrosoftkinectforevaluatingstaticfootposture
AT clarkrossa reliabilityandvalidityofthemicrosoftkinectforevaluatingstaticfootposture
AT mullinsalexandra reliabilityandvalidityofthemicrosoftkinectforevaluatingstaticfootposture
AT bryantadaml reliabilityandvalidityofthemicrosoftkinectforevaluatingstaticfootposture
AT bartoldsimon reliabilityandvalidityofthemicrosoftkinectforevaluatingstaticfootposture
AT patersonkade reliabilityandvalidityofthemicrosoftkinectforevaluatingstaticfootposture