Cargando…

Understanding Providers’ Offering and Patients’ Acceptance of HIV Screening in Emergency Departments: A Multilevel Analysis. ANRS 95008, Paris, France

OBJECTIVE: We assessed the EDs’ characteristics associated with the offer and acceptance rates of a nontargeted HIV rapid-test screening in 29 Emergency Departments (EDs) in the metropolitan Paris region (11.7 million inhabitants), where half of France’s new HIV cases are diagnosed annually. METHODS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilson d’Almeida, Kayigan, Pateron, Dominique, Kierzek, Gérald, Renaud, Bertrand, Semaille, Caroline, de Truchis, Pierre, Simon, François, Leblanc, Judith, Lert, France, Le Vu, Stéphane, Crémieux, Anne-Claude
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3639277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23638133
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062686
_version_ 1782475934023024640
author Wilson d’Almeida, Kayigan
Pateron, Dominique
Kierzek, Gérald
Renaud, Bertrand
Semaille, Caroline
de Truchis, Pierre
Simon, François
Leblanc, Judith
Lert, France
Le Vu, Stéphane
Crémieux, Anne-Claude
author_facet Wilson d’Almeida, Kayigan
Pateron, Dominique
Kierzek, Gérald
Renaud, Bertrand
Semaille, Caroline
de Truchis, Pierre
Simon, François
Leblanc, Judith
Lert, France
Le Vu, Stéphane
Crémieux, Anne-Claude
author_sort Wilson d’Almeida, Kayigan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We assessed the EDs’ characteristics associated with the offer and acceptance rates of a nontargeted HIV rapid-test screening in 29 Emergency Departments (EDs) in the metropolitan Paris region (11.7 million inhabitants), where half of France’s new HIV cases are diagnosed annually. METHODS: EDs nurses offered testing to all patients 18–64-year-old, able to provide consent, either with or without supplemental staff (hybrid staff model or indigenous staff model). The EDS’ characteristics collected included structural characteristics (location, type, size), daily workload (patients’ number and severity, length of stay in hours), staff’s participation (training, support to the intervention, leadership), type of week day (weekends vs weekdays) and time (in days). Associations between these variables and the staff model, the offer and acceptance rates were studied using multilevel modeling. RESULTS: Indigenous staff model was more frequent in EDs with a lower daily patient flow and a higher staff support score to the intervention. In indigenous-model EDs, the offer rate was associated with the patient flow (OR = 0.838, 95% CI = 0.773–0.908), was lower during weekends (OR = 0.623, 95% CI = 0.581–0.667) and decreased over time (OR = 0.978, 95% CI = 0.975–0.981). Similar results were found in hybrid-model EDs. Acceptance was poorly associated with EDs characteristics in indigenous-model EDs while in hybrid-model EDs it was lower during weekends (OR = 0.713, 95% CI = 0.623–0.816) and increased after the first positive test (OR = 1.526, 95% CI = 1.142–2.038). The EDs’ characteristics explained respectively 38.5% and 15% of the total variance in the offer rate across indigenous model-EDs and hybrid model-EDs vs 12% and 1% for the acceptance rate. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest the need for taking into account EDs’ characteristics while considering the implementation of an ED-based HIV screening program. Strategies allowing the optimization of human resources’ utilization such as HIV targeted screening in the EDs might be privileged.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3639277
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36392772013-05-01 Understanding Providers’ Offering and Patients’ Acceptance of HIV Screening in Emergency Departments: A Multilevel Analysis. ANRS 95008, Paris, France Wilson d’Almeida, Kayigan Pateron, Dominique Kierzek, Gérald Renaud, Bertrand Semaille, Caroline de Truchis, Pierre Simon, François Leblanc, Judith Lert, France Le Vu, Stéphane Crémieux, Anne-Claude PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: We assessed the EDs’ characteristics associated with the offer and acceptance rates of a nontargeted HIV rapid-test screening in 29 Emergency Departments (EDs) in the metropolitan Paris region (11.7 million inhabitants), where half of France’s new HIV cases are diagnosed annually. METHODS: EDs nurses offered testing to all patients 18–64-year-old, able to provide consent, either with or without supplemental staff (hybrid staff model or indigenous staff model). The EDS’ characteristics collected included structural characteristics (location, type, size), daily workload (patients’ number and severity, length of stay in hours), staff’s participation (training, support to the intervention, leadership), type of week day (weekends vs weekdays) and time (in days). Associations between these variables and the staff model, the offer and acceptance rates were studied using multilevel modeling. RESULTS: Indigenous staff model was more frequent in EDs with a lower daily patient flow and a higher staff support score to the intervention. In indigenous-model EDs, the offer rate was associated with the patient flow (OR = 0.838, 95% CI = 0.773–0.908), was lower during weekends (OR = 0.623, 95% CI = 0.581–0.667) and decreased over time (OR = 0.978, 95% CI = 0.975–0.981). Similar results were found in hybrid-model EDs. Acceptance was poorly associated with EDs characteristics in indigenous-model EDs while in hybrid-model EDs it was lower during weekends (OR = 0.713, 95% CI = 0.623–0.816) and increased after the first positive test (OR = 1.526, 95% CI = 1.142–2.038). The EDs’ characteristics explained respectively 38.5% and 15% of the total variance in the offer rate across indigenous model-EDs and hybrid model-EDs vs 12% and 1% for the acceptance rate. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest the need for taking into account EDs’ characteristics while considering the implementation of an ED-based HIV screening program. Strategies allowing the optimization of human resources’ utilization such as HIV targeted screening in the EDs might be privileged. Public Library of Science 2013-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3639277/ /pubmed/23638133 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062686 Text en © 2013 Wilson d'Almeida et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wilson d’Almeida, Kayigan
Pateron, Dominique
Kierzek, Gérald
Renaud, Bertrand
Semaille, Caroline
de Truchis, Pierre
Simon, François
Leblanc, Judith
Lert, France
Le Vu, Stéphane
Crémieux, Anne-Claude
Understanding Providers’ Offering and Patients’ Acceptance of HIV Screening in Emergency Departments: A Multilevel Analysis. ANRS 95008, Paris, France
title Understanding Providers’ Offering and Patients’ Acceptance of HIV Screening in Emergency Departments: A Multilevel Analysis. ANRS 95008, Paris, France
title_full Understanding Providers’ Offering and Patients’ Acceptance of HIV Screening in Emergency Departments: A Multilevel Analysis. ANRS 95008, Paris, France
title_fullStr Understanding Providers’ Offering and Patients’ Acceptance of HIV Screening in Emergency Departments: A Multilevel Analysis. ANRS 95008, Paris, France
title_full_unstemmed Understanding Providers’ Offering and Patients’ Acceptance of HIV Screening in Emergency Departments: A Multilevel Analysis. ANRS 95008, Paris, France
title_short Understanding Providers’ Offering and Patients’ Acceptance of HIV Screening in Emergency Departments: A Multilevel Analysis. ANRS 95008, Paris, France
title_sort understanding providers’ offering and patients’ acceptance of hiv screening in emergency departments: a multilevel analysis. anrs 95008, paris, france
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3639277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23638133
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062686
work_keys_str_mv AT wilsondalmeidakayigan understandingprovidersofferingandpatientsacceptanceofhivscreeninginemergencydepartmentsamultilevelanalysisanrs95008parisfrance
AT paterondominique understandingprovidersofferingandpatientsacceptanceofhivscreeninginemergencydepartmentsamultilevelanalysisanrs95008parisfrance
AT kierzekgerald understandingprovidersofferingandpatientsacceptanceofhivscreeninginemergencydepartmentsamultilevelanalysisanrs95008parisfrance
AT renaudbertrand understandingprovidersofferingandpatientsacceptanceofhivscreeninginemergencydepartmentsamultilevelanalysisanrs95008parisfrance
AT semaillecaroline understandingprovidersofferingandpatientsacceptanceofhivscreeninginemergencydepartmentsamultilevelanalysisanrs95008parisfrance
AT detruchispierre understandingprovidersofferingandpatientsacceptanceofhivscreeninginemergencydepartmentsamultilevelanalysisanrs95008parisfrance
AT simonfrancois understandingprovidersofferingandpatientsacceptanceofhivscreeninginemergencydepartmentsamultilevelanalysisanrs95008parisfrance
AT leblancjudith understandingprovidersofferingandpatientsacceptanceofhivscreeninginemergencydepartmentsamultilevelanalysisanrs95008parisfrance
AT lertfrance understandingprovidersofferingandpatientsacceptanceofhivscreeninginemergencydepartmentsamultilevelanalysisanrs95008parisfrance
AT levustephane understandingprovidersofferingandpatientsacceptanceofhivscreeninginemergencydepartmentsamultilevelanalysisanrs95008parisfrance
AT cremieuxanneclaude understandingprovidersofferingandpatientsacceptanceofhivscreeninginemergencydepartmentsamultilevelanalysisanrs95008parisfrance