Cargando…

Quantitative properties and receptor reserve of the DAG and PKC branch of G(q)-coupled receptor signaling

G(q) protein–coupled receptors (G(q)PCRs) of the plasma membrane activate the phospholipase C (PLC) signaling cascade. PLC cleaves the membrane lipid phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP(2)) into the second messengers diacylgycerol (DAG) and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP(3)), leading to cal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Falkenburger, Björn H., Dickson, Eamonn J., Hille, Bertil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Rockefeller University Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3639584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23630338
http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.201210887
Descripción
Sumario:G(q) protein–coupled receptors (G(q)PCRs) of the plasma membrane activate the phospholipase C (PLC) signaling cascade. PLC cleaves the membrane lipid phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP(2)) into the second messengers diacylgycerol (DAG) and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP(3)), leading to calcium release, protein kinase C (PKC) activation, and in some cases, PIP(2) depletion. We determine the kinetics of each of these downstream endpoints and also ask which is responsible for the inhibition of KCNQ2/3 (K(V)7.2/7.3) potassium channels in single living tsA-201 cells. We measure DAG production and PKC activity by Förster resonance energy transfer–based sensors, and PIP(2) by KCNQ2/3 channels. Fully activating endogenous purinergic receptors by uridine 5′triphosphate (UTP) leads to calcium release, DAG production, and PKC activation, but no net PIP(2) depletion. Fully activating high-density transfected muscarinic receptors (M(1)Rs) by oxotremorine-M (Oxo-M) leads to similar calcium, DAG, and PKC signals, but PIP(2) is depleted. KCNQ2/3 channels are inhibited by the Oxo-M treatment (85%) and not by UTP (<1%), indicating that depletion of PIP(2) is required to inhibit KCNQ2/3 in response to receptor activation. Overexpression of A kinase–anchoring protein (AKAP)79 or calmodulin (CaM) does not increase KCNQ2/3 inhibition by UTP. From these results and measurements of IP(3) and calcium presented in our companion paper (Dickson et al. 2013. J. Gen. Physiol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.201210886), we extend our kinetic model for signaling from M(1)Rs to DAG/PKC and IP(3)/calcium signaling. We conclude that calcium/CaM and PKC-mediated phosphorylation do not underlie dynamic KCNQ2/3 channel inhibition during G(q)PCR activation in tsA-201 cells. Finally, our experimental data provide indirect evidence for cleavage of PI(4)P by PLC in living cells, and our modeling revisits/explains the concept of receptor reserve with measurements from all steps of G(q)PCR signaling.