Cargando…
A randomised controlled trial comparing standard or intensive management of reduced fetal movements after 36 weeks gestation-a feasibility study
BACKGROUND: Women presenting with reduced fetal movements (RFM) in the third trimester are at increased risk of stillbirth or fetal growth restriction. These outcomes after RFM are related to smaller fetal size on ultrasound scan, oligohydramnios and lower human placental lactogen (hPL) in maternal...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3640967/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23590451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-95 |
_version_ | 1782267956513734656 |
---|---|
author | Heazell, Alexander EP Bernatavicius, Giovanna Roberts, Stephen A Garrod, Ainslie Whitworth, Melissa K Johnstone, Edward D Gillham, Joanna C Lavender, Tina |
author_facet | Heazell, Alexander EP Bernatavicius, Giovanna Roberts, Stephen A Garrod, Ainslie Whitworth, Melissa K Johnstone, Edward D Gillham, Joanna C Lavender, Tina |
author_sort | Heazell, Alexander EP |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Women presenting with reduced fetal movements (RFM) in the third trimester are at increased risk of stillbirth or fetal growth restriction. These outcomes after RFM are related to smaller fetal size on ultrasound scan, oligohydramnios and lower human placental lactogen (hPL) in maternal serum. We performed this study to address whether a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of the management of RFM was feasible with regard to: i) maternal recruitment and retention ii) patient acceptability, iii) adherence to protocol. Additionally, we aimed to confirm the prevalence of poor perinatal outcomes defined as: stillbirth, birthweight <10(th) centile, umbilical arterial pH <7.1 or unexpected admission to the neonatal intensive care unit. METHODS: Women with RFM ≥36 weeks gestation were invited to participate in a RCT comparing standard management (ultrasound scan if indicated, induction of labour (IOL) based on consultant decision) with intensive management (ultrasound scan, maternal serum hPL, IOL if either result was abnormal). Anxiety was assessed by state-trait anxiety index (STAI) before and after investigations for RFM. Rates of protocol compliance and IOL for RFM were calculated. Participant views were assessed by questionnaires. RESULTS: 137 women were approached, 120 (88%) participated, 60 in each group, 2 women in the standard group did not complete the study. 20% of participants had a poor perinatal outcome. All women in the intensive group had ultrasound assessment of fetal size and liquor volume vs. 97% in the standard group. 50% of the intensive group had IOL for abnormal scan or low hPL after RFM vs. 26% of controls (p < 0.01). STAI reduced for all women after investigations, but this reduction was greater in the standard group (p = 0.02). Participants had positive views about their involvement in the study. CONCLUSION: An RCT of management of RFM is feasible with a low rate of attrition. Investigations decrease maternal anxiety. Participants in the intensive group were more likely to have IOL for RFM. Further work is required to determine the likely level of intervention in the standard care arm in multiple centres, to develop additional placental biomarkers and to confirm that the composite outcome is valid. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN07944306 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3640967 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36409672013-05-02 A randomised controlled trial comparing standard or intensive management of reduced fetal movements after 36 weeks gestation-a feasibility study Heazell, Alexander EP Bernatavicius, Giovanna Roberts, Stephen A Garrod, Ainslie Whitworth, Melissa K Johnstone, Edward D Gillham, Joanna C Lavender, Tina BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Women presenting with reduced fetal movements (RFM) in the third trimester are at increased risk of stillbirth or fetal growth restriction. These outcomes after RFM are related to smaller fetal size on ultrasound scan, oligohydramnios and lower human placental lactogen (hPL) in maternal serum. We performed this study to address whether a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of the management of RFM was feasible with regard to: i) maternal recruitment and retention ii) patient acceptability, iii) adherence to protocol. Additionally, we aimed to confirm the prevalence of poor perinatal outcomes defined as: stillbirth, birthweight <10(th) centile, umbilical arterial pH <7.1 or unexpected admission to the neonatal intensive care unit. METHODS: Women with RFM ≥36 weeks gestation were invited to participate in a RCT comparing standard management (ultrasound scan if indicated, induction of labour (IOL) based on consultant decision) with intensive management (ultrasound scan, maternal serum hPL, IOL if either result was abnormal). Anxiety was assessed by state-trait anxiety index (STAI) before and after investigations for RFM. Rates of protocol compliance and IOL for RFM were calculated. Participant views were assessed by questionnaires. RESULTS: 137 women were approached, 120 (88%) participated, 60 in each group, 2 women in the standard group did not complete the study. 20% of participants had a poor perinatal outcome. All women in the intensive group had ultrasound assessment of fetal size and liquor volume vs. 97% in the standard group. 50% of the intensive group had IOL for abnormal scan or low hPL after RFM vs. 26% of controls (p < 0.01). STAI reduced for all women after investigations, but this reduction was greater in the standard group (p = 0.02). Participants had positive views about their involvement in the study. CONCLUSION: An RCT of management of RFM is feasible with a low rate of attrition. Investigations decrease maternal anxiety. Participants in the intensive group were more likely to have IOL for RFM. Further work is required to determine the likely level of intervention in the standard care arm in multiple centres, to develop additional placental biomarkers and to confirm that the composite outcome is valid. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN07944306 BioMed Central 2013-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3640967/ /pubmed/23590451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-95 Text en Copyright © 2013 Heazell et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Heazell, Alexander EP Bernatavicius, Giovanna Roberts, Stephen A Garrod, Ainslie Whitworth, Melissa K Johnstone, Edward D Gillham, Joanna C Lavender, Tina A randomised controlled trial comparing standard or intensive management of reduced fetal movements after 36 weeks gestation-a feasibility study |
title | A randomised controlled trial comparing standard or intensive management of reduced fetal movements after 36 weeks gestation-a feasibility study |
title_full | A randomised controlled trial comparing standard or intensive management of reduced fetal movements after 36 weeks gestation-a feasibility study |
title_fullStr | A randomised controlled trial comparing standard or intensive management of reduced fetal movements after 36 weeks gestation-a feasibility study |
title_full_unstemmed | A randomised controlled trial comparing standard or intensive management of reduced fetal movements after 36 weeks gestation-a feasibility study |
title_short | A randomised controlled trial comparing standard or intensive management of reduced fetal movements after 36 weeks gestation-a feasibility study |
title_sort | randomised controlled trial comparing standard or intensive management of reduced fetal movements after 36 weeks gestation-a feasibility study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3640967/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23590451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-95 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heazellalexanderep arandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingstandardorintensivemanagementofreducedfetalmovementsafter36weeksgestationafeasibilitystudy AT bernataviciusgiovanna arandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingstandardorintensivemanagementofreducedfetalmovementsafter36weeksgestationafeasibilitystudy AT robertsstephena arandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingstandardorintensivemanagementofreducedfetalmovementsafter36weeksgestationafeasibilitystudy AT garrodainslie arandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingstandardorintensivemanagementofreducedfetalmovementsafter36weeksgestationafeasibilitystudy AT whitworthmelissak arandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingstandardorintensivemanagementofreducedfetalmovementsafter36weeksgestationafeasibilitystudy AT johnstoneedwardd arandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingstandardorintensivemanagementofreducedfetalmovementsafter36weeksgestationafeasibilitystudy AT gillhamjoannac arandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingstandardorintensivemanagementofreducedfetalmovementsafter36weeksgestationafeasibilitystudy AT lavendertina arandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingstandardorintensivemanagementofreducedfetalmovementsafter36weeksgestationafeasibilitystudy AT heazellalexanderep randomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingstandardorintensivemanagementofreducedfetalmovementsafter36weeksgestationafeasibilitystudy AT bernataviciusgiovanna randomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingstandardorintensivemanagementofreducedfetalmovementsafter36weeksgestationafeasibilitystudy AT robertsstephena randomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingstandardorintensivemanagementofreducedfetalmovementsafter36weeksgestationafeasibilitystudy AT garrodainslie randomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingstandardorintensivemanagementofreducedfetalmovementsafter36weeksgestationafeasibilitystudy AT whitworthmelissak randomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingstandardorintensivemanagementofreducedfetalmovementsafter36weeksgestationafeasibilitystudy AT johnstoneedwardd randomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingstandardorintensivemanagementofreducedfetalmovementsafter36weeksgestationafeasibilitystudy AT gillhamjoannac randomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingstandardorintensivemanagementofreducedfetalmovementsafter36weeksgestationafeasibilitystudy AT lavendertina randomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingstandardorintensivemanagementofreducedfetalmovementsafter36weeksgestationafeasibilitystudy |