Cargando…

Pharmacist-led management of chronic pain in primary care: results from a randomised controlled exploratory trial

OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of pharmacist medication review, with or without pharmacist prescribing, with standard care, for patients with chronic pain. DESIGN: An exploratory randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Six general practices with prescribing pharmacists in Grampian (3) and Ea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bruhn, Hanne, Bond, Christine M, Elliott, Alison M, Hannaford, Philip C, Lee, Amanda J, McNamee, Paul, Smith, Blair H, Watson, Margaret C, Holland, Richard, Wright, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3641445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23562814
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002361
_version_ 1782268024489771008
author Bruhn, Hanne
Bond, Christine M
Elliott, Alison M
Hannaford, Philip C
Lee, Amanda J
McNamee, Paul
Smith, Blair H
Watson, Margaret C
Holland, Richard
Wright, David
author_facet Bruhn, Hanne
Bond, Christine M
Elliott, Alison M
Hannaford, Philip C
Lee, Amanda J
McNamee, Paul
Smith, Blair H
Watson, Margaret C
Holland, Richard
Wright, David
author_sort Bruhn, Hanne
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of pharmacist medication review, with or without pharmacist prescribing, with standard care, for patients with chronic pain. DESIGN: An exploratory randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Six general practices with prescribing pharmacists in Grampian (3) and East Anglia (3). PARTICIPANTS: Patients on repeat prescribed pain medication (4815) were screened by general practitioners (GPs), and mailed invitations (1397). 196 were randomised and 180 (92%) completed. Exclusion criteria included: severe mental illness, terminally ill, cancer related pain, history of addiction. RANDOMISATION AND INTERVENTION: Patients were randomised using a remote telephone service to: (1) pharmacist medication review with face-to-face pharmacist prescribing; (2) pharmacist medication review with feedback to GP and no planned patient contact or (3) treatment as usual (TAU). Blinding was not possible. OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes were the SF-12v2, the Chronic Pain Grade (CPG), the Health Utilities Index 3 and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Outcomes were collected at 0, 3 and 6 months. RESULTS: In the prescribing arm (n=70) two patients were excluded/nine withdrew. In the review arm (n=63) one was excluded/three withdrew. In the TAU arm (n=63) four withdrew. Compared with baseline, patients had an improved CPG in the prescribing arm, 47.7% (21/44; p=0.003) and in the review arm, 38.6% (17/44; p=0.001), but not the TAU group, 31.3% (15/48; ns). The SF-12 Physical Component Score showed no effect in the prescribing or review arms but improvement in TAU (p=0.02). The SF-12 Mental Component Score showed no effect for the prescribing or review arms and deterioration in the TAU arm (p=0.002). HADS scores improved within the prescribing arm for depression (p=0.022) and anxiety (p=0.007), between groups (p=0.022 and p=0.045, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first randomised controlled trial of pharmacist prescribing in the UK, and suggests that there may be a benefit for patients with chronic pain. A larger trial is required. Trial registration: www.isrctn.org/ISRCTN06131530. Medical Research Council funding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3641445
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36414452013-05-07 Pharmacist-led management of chronic pain in primary care: results from a randomised controlled exploratory trial Bruhn, Hanne Bond, Christine M Elliott, Alison M Hannaford, Philip C Lee, Amanda J McNamee, Paul Smith, Blair H Watson, Margaret C Holland, Richard Wright, David BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of pharmacist medication review, with or without pharmacist prescribing, with standard care, for patients with chronic pain. DESIGN: An exploratory randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Six general practices with prescribing pharmacists in Grampian (3) and East Anglia (3). PARTICIPANTS: Patients on repeat prescribed pain medication (4815) were screened by general practitioners (GPs), and mailed invitations (1397). 196 were randomised and 180 (92%) completed. Exclusion criteria included: severe mental illness, terminally ill, cancer related pain, history of addiction. RANDOMISATION AND INTERVENTION: Patients were randomised using a remote telephone service to: (1) pharmacist medication review with face-to-face pharmacist prescribing; (2) pharmacist medication review with feedback to GP and no planned patient contact or (3) treatment as usual (TAU). Blinding was not possible. OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes were the SF-12v2, the Chronic Pain Grade (CPG), the Health Utilities Index 3 and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Outcomes were collected at 0, 3 and 6 months. RESULTS: In the prescribing arm (n=70) two patients were excluded/nine withdrew. In the review arm (n=63) one was excluded/three withdrew. In the TAU arm (n=63) four withdrew. Compared with baseline, patients had an improved CPG in the prescribing arm, 47.7% (21/44; p=0.003) and in the review arm, 38.6% (17/44; p=0.001), but not the TAU group, 31.3% (15/48; ns). The SF-12 Physical Component Score showed no effect in the prescribing or review arms but improvement in TAU (p=0.02). The SF-12 Mental Component Score showed no effect for the prescribing or review arms and deterioration in the TAU arm (p=0.002). HADS scores improved within the prescribing arm for depression (p=0.022) and anxiety (p=0.007), between groups (p=0.022 and p=0.045, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first randomised controlled trial of pharmacist prescribing in the UK, and suggests that there may be a benefit for patients with chronic pain. A larger trial is required. Trial registration: www.isrctn.org/ISRCTN06131530. Medical Research Council funding. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3641445/ /pubmed/23562814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002361 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/legalcode
spellingShingle General practice / Family practice
Bruhn, Hanne
Bond, Christine M
Elliott, Alison M
Hannaford, Philip C
Lee, Amanda J
McNamee, Paul
Smith, Blair H
Watson, Margaret C
Holland, Richard
Wright, David
Pharmacist-led management of chronic pain in primary care: results from a randomised controlled exploratory trial
title Pharmacist-led management of chronic pain in primary care: results from a randomised controlled exploratory trial
title_full Pharmacist-led management of chronic pain in primary care: results from a randomised controlled exploratory trial
title_fullStr Pharmacist-led management of chronic pain in primary care: results from a randomised controlled exploratory trial
title_full_unstemmed Pharmacist-led management of chronic pain in primary care: results from a randomised controlled exploratory trial
title_short Pharmacist-led management of chronic pain in primary care: results from a randomised controlled exploratory trial
title_sort pharmacist-led management of chronic pain in primary care: results from a randomised controlled exploratory trial
topic General practice / Family practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3641445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23562814
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002361
work_keys_str_mv AT bruhnhanne pharmacistledmanagementofchronicpaininprimarycareresultsfromarandomisedcontrolledexploratorytrial
AT bondchristinem pharmacistledmanagementofchronicpaininprimarycareresultsfromarandomisedcontrolledexploratorytrial
AT elliottalisonm pharmacistledmanagementofchronicpaininprimarycareresultsfromarandomisedcontrolledexploratorytrial
AT hannafordphilipc pharmacistledmanagementofchronicpaininprimarycareresultsfromarandomisedcontrolledexploratorytrial
AT leeamandaj pharmacistledmanagementofchronicpaininprimarycareresultsfromarandomisedcontrolledexploratorytrial
AT mcnameepaul pharmacistledmanagementofchronicpaininprimarycareresultsfromarandomisedcontrolledexploratorytrial
AT smithblairh pharmacistledmanagementofchronicpaininprimarycareresultsfromarandomisedcontrolledexploratorytrial
AT watsonmargaretc pharmacistledmanagementofchronicpaininprimarycareresultsfromarandomisedcontrolledexploratorytrial
AT hollandrichard pharmacistledmanagementofchronicpaininprimarycareresultsfromarandomisedcontrolledexploratorytrial
AT wrightdavid pharmacistledmanagementofchronicpaininprimarycareresultsfromarandomisedcontrolledexploratorytrial