Cargando…
How accurate are medical record data in Afghanistan's maternal health facilities? An observational validity study
OBJECTIVES: Improvement activities, surveillance and research in maternal and neonatal health in Afghanistan rely heavily on medical record data. This study investigates accuracy in delivery care records from three hospitals across workshifts. DESIGN: Observational cross-sectional study. SETTING: Th...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3641480/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23619087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002554 |
_version_ | 1782268032534446080 |
---|---|
author | Broughton, Edward I Ikram, Abdul Naser Sahak, Ihsanullah |
author_facet | Broughton, Edward I Ikram, Abdul Naser Sahak, Ihsanullah |
author_sort | Broughton, Edward I |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Improvement activities, surveillance and research in maternal and neonatal health in Afghanistan rely heavily on medical record data. This study investigates accuracy in delivery care records from three hospitals across workshifts. DESIGN: Observational cross-sectional study. SETTING: The study was conducted in one maternity hospital, one general hospital maternity department and one provincial hospital maternity department. Researchers observed vaginal deliveries and recorded observations to later check against data recorded in patient medical records and facility registers. OUTCOME MEASURES: We determined the sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operator characteristics curves (AUROCs), proportions correctly classified and the tendency to make performance seem better than it actually was. RESULTS: 600 observations across the three shifts and three hospitals showed high compliance with active management of the third stage of labour, measuring blood loss and uterine contraction at 30 min, cord care, drying and wrapping newborns and Apgar scores and low compliance with monitoring vital signs. Compliance with quality indicators was high and specificity was lower than sensitivity. For adverse outcomes in birth registries, specificity was higher than sensitivity. Overall AUROCs were between 0.5 and 0.6. Of 17 variables that showed biased errors, 12 made performance or outcomes seem better than they were, and five made them look worse (71% vs 29%, p=0.143). Compliance, sensitivity and specificity varied less among the three shifts than among hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Medical record accuracy was generally poor. Errors by clinicians did not appear to follow a pattern of self-enhancement of performance. Because successful improvement activities, surveillance and research in these settings are heavily reliant on collecting accurate data on processes and outcomes of care, substantial improvement is needed in medical record accuracy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3641480 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36414802013-05-07 How accurate are medical record data in Afghanistan's maternal health facilities? An observational validity study Broughton, Edward I Ikram, Abdul Naser Sahak, Ihsanullah BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology OBJECTIVES: Improvement activities, surveillance and research in maternal and neonatal health in Afghanistan rely heavily on medical record data. This study investigates accuracy in delivery care records from three hospitals across workshifts. DESIGN: Observational cross-sectional study. SETTING: The study was conducted in one maternity hospital, one general hospital maternity department and one provincial hospital maternity department. Researchers observed vaginal deliveries and recorded observations to later check against data recorded in patient medical records and facility registers. OUTCOME MEASURES: We determined the sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operator characteristics curves (AUROCs), proportions correctly classified and the tendency to make performance seem better than it actually was. RESULTS: 600 observations across the three shifts and three hospitals showed high compliance with active management of the third stage of labour, measuring blood loss and uterine contraction at 30 min, cord care, drying and wrapping newborns and Apgar scores and low compliance with monitoring vital signs. Compliance with quality indicators was high and specificity was lower than sensitivity. For adverse outcomes in birth registries, specificity was higher than sensitivity. Overall AUROCs were between 0.5 and 0.6. Of 17 variables that showed biased errors, 12 made performance or outcomes seem better than they were, and five made them look worse (71% vs 29%, p=0.143). Compliance, sensitivity and specificity varied less among the three shifts than among hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Medical record accuracy was generally poor. Errors by clinicians did not appear to follow a pattern of self-enhancement of performance. Because successful improvement activities, surveillance and research in these settings are heavily reliant on collecting accurate data on processes and outcomes of care, substantial improvement is needed in medical record accuracy. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3641480/ /pubmed/23619087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002554 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/legalcode |
spellingShingle | Obstetrics and Gynaecology Broughton, Edward I Ikram, Abdul Naser Sahak, Ihsanullah How accurate are medical record data in Afghanistan's maternal health facilities? An observational validity study |
title | How accurate are medical record data in Afghanistan's maternal health facilities? An observational validity study |
title_full | How accurate are medical record data in Afghanistan's maternal health facilities? An observational validity study |
title_fullStr | How accurate are medical record data in Afghanistan's maternal health facilities? An observational validity study |
title_full_unstemmed | How accurate are medical record data in Afghanistan's maternal health facilities? An observational validity study |
title_short | How accurate are medical record data in Afghanistan's maternal health facilities? An observational validity study |
title_sort | how accurate are medical record data in afghanistan's maternal health facilities? an observational validity study |
topic | Obstetrics and Gynaecology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3641480/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23619087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002554 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT broughtonedwardi howaccuratearemedicalrecorddatainafghanistansmaternalhealthfacilitiesanobservationalvaliditystudy AT ikramabdulnaser howaccuratearemedicalrecorddatainafghanistansmaternalhealthfacilitiesanobservationalvaliditystudy AT sahakihsanullah howaccuratearemedicalrecorddatainafghanistansmaternalhealthfacilitiesanobservationalvaliditystudy |