Cargando…

How accurate are medical record data in Afghanistan's maternal health facilities? An observational validity study

OBJECTIVES: Improvement activities, surveillance and research in maternal and neonatal health in Afghanistan rely heavily on medical record data. This study investigates accuracy in delivery care records from three hospitals across workshifts. DESIGN: Observational cross-sectional study. SETTING: Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Broughton, Edward I, Ikram, Abdul Naser, Sahak, Ihsanullah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3641480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23619087
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002554
_version_ 1782268032534446080
author Broughton, Edward I
Ikram, Abdul Naser
Sahak, Ihsanullah
author_facet Broughton, Edward I
Ikram, Abdul Naser
Sahak, Ihsanullah
author_sort Broughton, Edward I
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Improvement activities, surveillance and research in maternal and neonatal health in Afghanistan rely heavily on medical record data. This study investigates accuracy in delivery care records from three hospitals across workshifts. DESIGN: Observational cross-sectional study. SETTING: The study was conducted in one maternity hospital, one general hospital maternity department and one provincial hospital maternity department. Researchers observed vaginal deliveries and recorded observations to later check against data recorded in patient medical records and facility registers. OUTCOME MEASURES: We determined the sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operator characteristics curves (AUROCs), proportions correctly classified and the tendency to make performance seem better than it actually was. RESULTS: 600 observations across the three shifts and three hospitals showed high compliance with active management of the third stage of labour, measuring blood loss and uterine contraction at 30 min, cord care, drying and wrapping newborns and Apgar scores and low compliance with monitoring vital signs. Compliance with quality indicators was high and specificity was lower than sensitivity. For adverse outcomes in birth registries, specificity was higher than sensitivity. Overall AUROCs were between 0.5 and 0.6. Of 17 variables that showed biased errors, 12 made performance or outcomes seem better than they were, and five made them look worse (71% vs 29%, p=0.143). Compliance, sensitivity and specificity varied less among the three shifts than among hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Medical record accuracy was generally poor. Errors by clinicians did not appear to follow a pattern of self-enhancement of performance. Because successful improvement activities, surveillance and research in these settings are heavily reliant on collecting accurate data on processes and outcomes of care, substantial improvement is needed in medical record accuracy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3641480
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36414802013-05-07 How accurate are medical record data in Afghanistan's maternal health facilities? An observational validity study Broughton, Edward I Ikram, Abdul Naser Sahak, Ihsanullah BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology OBJECTIVES: Improvement activities, surveillance and research in maternal and neonatal health in Afghanistan rely heavily on medical record data. This study investigates accuracy in delivery care records from three hospitals across workshifts. DESIGN: Observational cross-sectional study. SETTING: The study was conducted in one maternity hospital, one general hospital maternity department and one provincial hospital maternity department. Researchers observed vaginal deliveries and recorded observations to later check against data recorded in patient medical records and facility registers. OUTCOME MEASURES: We determined the sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operator characteristics curves (AUROCs), proportions correctly classified and the tendency to make performance seem better than it actually was. RESULTS: 600 observations across the three shifts and three hospitals showed high compliance with active management of the third stage of labour, measuring blood loss and uterine contraction at 30 min, cord care, drying and wrapping newborns and Apgar scores and low compliance with monitoring vital signs. Compliance with quality indicators was high and specificity was lower than sensitivity. For adverse outcomes in birth registries, specificity was higher than sensitivity. Overall AUROCs were between 0.5 and 0.6. Of 17 variables that showed biased errors, 12 made performance or outcomes seem better than they were, and five made them look worse (71% vs 29%, p=0.143). Compliance, sensitivity and specificity varied less among the three shifts than among hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Medical record accuracy was generally poor. Errors by clinicians did not appear to follow a pattern of self-enhancement of performance. Because successful improvement activities, surveillance and research in these settings are heavily reliant on collecting accurate data on processes and outcomes of care, substantial improvement is needed in medical record accuracy. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3641480/ /pubmed/23619087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002554 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/legalcode
spellingShingle Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Broughton, Edward I
Ikram, Abdul Naser
Sahak, Ihsanullah
How accurate are medical record data in Afghanistan's maternal health facilities? An observational validity study
title How accurate are medical record data in Afghanistan's maternal health facilities? An observational validity study
title_full How accurate are medical record data in Afghanistan's maternal health facilities? An observational validity study
title_fullStr How accurate are medical record data in Afghanistan's maternal health facilities? An observational validity study
title_full_unstemmed How accurate are medical record data in Afghanistan's maternal health facilities? An observational validity study
title_short How accurate are medical record data in Afghanistan's maternal health facilities? An observational validity study
title_sort how accurate are medical record data in afghanistan's maternal health facilities? an observational validity study
topic Obstetrics and Gynaecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3641480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23619087
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002554
work_keys_str_mv AT broughtonedwardi howaccuratearemedicalrecorddatainafghanistansmaternalhealthfacilitiesanobservationalvaliditystudy
AT ikramabdulnaser howaccuratearemedicalrecorddatainafghanistansmaternalhealthfacilitiesanobservationalvaliditystudy
AT sahakihsanullah howaccuratearemedicalrecorddatainafghanistansmaternalhealthfacilitiesanobservationalvaliditystudy