Cargando…
The benefits of thermal clothing during winter in patients with heart failure: a pilot randomised controlled trial
OBJECTIVES: To examine whether providing thermal clothing to heart failure patients improves their health during winter. DESIGN: A randomised controlled trial with an intervention group and a usual care group. SETTING: Heart failure clinic in a large tertiary referral hospital in Brisbane, Australia...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3641493/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23633420 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002799 |
Sumario: | OBJECTIVES: To examine whether providing thermal clothing to heart failure patients improves their health during winter. DESIGN: A randomised controlled trial with an intervention group and a usual care group. SETTING: Heart failure clinic in a large tertiary referral hospital in Brisbane, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Eligible participants were those with known systolic heart failure who were over 50 years of age and lived in Southeast Queensland. Participants were excluded if they lived in a residential aged care facility, had incontinence or were unable to give informed consent. Fifty-five participants were randomised and 50 completed. INTERVENTIONS: Participants randomised to the intervention received two thermal hats and tops and a digital thermometer. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the mean number of days in hospital. Secondary outcomes were the number of general practitioner (GP) visits and self-rated health. RESULTS: The mean number of days in hospital per 100 winter days was 2.5 in the intervention group and 1.8 in the usual care group, with a mean difference of 0.7 (95% CI −1.5 to 5.4). The intervention group had 0.2 fewer GP visits on average (95% CI −0.8 to 0.3), and a higher self-rated health, mean improvement –0.3 (95% CI −0.9 to 0.3). The thermal tops were generally well used, but even in cold temperatures the hats were only worn by 30% of the participants. CONCLUSIONS: Thermal clothes are a cheap and simple intervention, but further work needs to be done on increasing compliance and confirming the health and economic benefits of providing thermals to at-risk groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12612000378820) |
---|