Cargando…

Identifying intensive care unit discharge planning tools: protocol for a scoping review

BACKGROUND: Transitions of care between providers are vulnerable periods in healthcare delivery that expose patients to preventable errors and adverse events. Patient discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU) to a medical or surgical hospital ward is one of the most challenging and high risk tran...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stelfox, Henry T, Perrier, Laure, Straus, Sharon E, Ghali, William A, Zygun, David, Boiteau, Paul, Zuege, Danny J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3641498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23562817
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002653
_version_ 1782268036179296256
author Stelfox, Henry T
Perrier, Laure
Straus, Sharon E
Ghali, William A
Zygun, David
Boiteau, Paul
Zuege, Danny J
author_facet Stelfox, Henry T
Perrier, Laure
Straus, Sharon E
Ghali, William A
Zygun, David
Boiteau, Paul
Zuege, Danny J
author_sort Stelfox, Henry T
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Transitions of care between providers are vulnerable periods in healthcare delivery that expose patients to preventable errors and adverse events. Patient discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU) to a medical or surgical hospital ward is one of the most challenging and high risk transitions of care. Approximately 1 in 12 patients discharged will be readmitted to ICU or die before leaving the hospital. Many more patients are exposed to unnecessary healthcare, adverse events and/or are disappointed with the quality of their care. Our objective is to conduct a scoping review by systematically searching the literature to identify ICU discharge planning tools and their supporting evidence-base including barriers and facilitators to their use. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Systematic searching of the published health literature will be conducted to identify the existing ICU discharge planning tools and supporting evidence. Literature (research and non-research) reporting on the tools used to facilitate decision making and/or communication at ICU discharge with patients of any age will be included. Outcomes will include adverse events and provider and patient/family-reported outcomes. Two investigators will independently review the abstracts (screen 1) to identify those meeting the inclusion criteria and then independently assess the full text articles (screen 2) to determine if they meet the inclusion criteria. Data collection will include information on citations and identified tools. A quality assessment will be performed on original research studies. A descriptive summary will be developed for each tool. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Our scoping review will synthesise the literature for ICU discharge planning tools and identify the opportunities for knowledge to action and gaps in evidence where primary evidence is necessary. This will serve as the foundational element in a multistep research programme to standardise and improve the quality of care provided to patients during ICU discharge. Ethics approval is not required for this study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3641498
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36414982013-05-07 Identifying intensive care unit discharge planning tools: protocol for a scoping review Stelfox, Henry T Perrier, Laure Straus, Sharon E Ghali, William A Zygun, David Boiteau, Paul Zuege, Danny J BMJ Open Intensive Care BACKGROUND: Transitions of care between providers are vulnerable periods in healthcare delivery that expose patients to preventable errors and adverse events. Patient discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU) to a medical or surgical hospital ward is one of the most challenging and high risk transitions of care. Approximately 1 in 12 patients discharged will be readmitted to ICU or die before leaving the hospital. Many more patients are exposed to unnecessary healthcare, adverse events and/or are disappointed with the quality of their care. Our objective is to conduct a scoping review by systematically searching the literature to identify ICU discharge planning tools and their supporting evidence-base including barriers and facilitators to their use. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Systematic searching of the published health literature will be conducted to identify the existing ICU discharge planning tools and supporting evidence. Literature (research and non-research) reporting on the tools used to facilitate decision making and/or communication at ICU discharge with patients of any age will be included. Outcomes will include adverse events and provider and patient/family-reported outcomes. Two investigators will independently review the abstracts (screen 1) to identify those meeting the inclusion criteria and then independently assess the full text articles (screen 2) to determine if they meet the inclusion criteria. Data collection will include information on citations and identified tools. A quality assessment will be performed on original research studies. A descriptive summary will be developed for each tool. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Our scoping review will synthesise the literature for ICU discharge planning tools and identify the opportunities for knowledge to action and gaps in evidence where primary evidence is necessary. This will serve as the foundational element in a multistep research programme to standardise and improve the quality of care provided to patients during ICU discharge. Ethics approval is not required for this study. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3641498/ /pubmed/23562817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002653 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/legalcode
spellingShingle Intensive Care
Stelfox, Henry T
Perrier, Laure
Straus, Sharon E
Ghali, William A
Zygun, David
Boiteau, Paul
Zuege, Danny J
Identifying intensive care unit discharge planning tools: protocol for a scoping review
title Identifying intensive care unit discharge planning tools: protocol for a scoping review
title_full Identifying intensive care unit discharge planning tools: protocol for a scoping review
title_fullStr Identifying intensive care unit discharge planning tools: protocol for a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Identifying intensive care unit discharge planning tools: protocol for a scoping review
title_short Identifying intensive care unit discharge planning tools: protocol for a scoping review
title_sort identifying intensive care unit discharge planning tools: protocol for a scoping review
topic Intensive Care
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3641498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23562817
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002653
work_keys_str_mv AT stelfoxhenryt identifyingintensivecareunitdischargeplanningtoolsprotocolforascopingreview
AT perrierlaure identifyingintensivecareunitdischargeplanningtoolsprotocolforascopingreview
AT straussharone identifyingintensivecareunitdischargeplanningtoolsprotocolforascopingreview
AT ghaliwilliama identifyingintensivecareunitdischargeplanningtoolsprotocolforascopingreview
AT zygundavid identifyingintensivecareunitdischargeplanningtoolsprotocolforascopingreview
AT boiteaupaul identifyingintensivecareunitdischargeplanningtoolsprotocolforascopingreview
AT zuegedannyj identifyingintensivecareunitdischargeplanningtoolsprotocolforascopingreview