Cargando…

A comparison between antenatal care quality in public and private sector in rural Hebei, China

AIM: To evaluate the quality of antenatal care (ANC) in Hebei Province and compare it between the public and private sector and within the public sector. METHODS: We conducted a Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Household Survey in 2010 using a two-stage sampling procedure and included 1079 mothers...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Li, Dai, Yaohua, Zhang, Yanfeng, Wu, Qiong, Rudan, Diana, Saftić, Vanja, van Velthoven, Michelle H.M.M.T., Su, Jianqiang, Tan, Zangwen, Scherpbier, Robert W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Croatian Medical Schools 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3641873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23630142
http://dx.doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2013.54.146
_version_ 1782268059430420480
author Chen, Li
Dai, Yaohua
Zhang, Yanfeng
Wu, Qiong
Rudan, Diana
Saftić, Vanja
van Velthoven, Michelle H.M.M.T.
Su, Jianqiang
Tan, Zangwen
Scherpbier, Robert W.
author_facet Chen, Li
Dai, Yaohua
Zhang, Yanfeng
Wu, Qiong
Rudan, Diana
Saftić, Vanja
van Velthoven, Michelle H.M.M.T.
Su, Jianqiang
Tan, Zangwen
Scherpbier, Robert W.
author_sort Chen, Li
collection PubMed
description AIM: To evaluate the quality of antenatal care (ANC) in Hebei Province and compare it between the public and private sector and within the public sector. METHODS: We conducted a Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Household Survey in 2010 using a two-stage sampling procedure and included 1079 mothers. The quality of ANC was assessed on the basis of the number of ANC visits, the time of the first ANC visit, 16 different ANC procedures, owning a maternal health care booklet, and the type of service provider. RESULTS: Almost all women (98%) received ANC services at least once, 80% at least four times, and 54% at least five times. About half of the women (46%) visited ANC facility within their first trimester. Neither public nor private sector provided all 16 standardized services, but significantly more women in public sector received ANC procedures. Most women received ANC in county or higher-level hospitals (75%) and very few in township hospitals (8%). Significantly fewer women were weighed and tested for HIV/AIDS in township than in county or higher-level hospitals. CONCLUSION: The quality of ANC in Hebei was poorer than required by China’s national and World Health Organization norms. Although the public sector performed better than the private sector, the utilization and quality of care of ANC services in this sector varied and women generally visited county or higher-level health facilities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3641873
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Croatian Medical Schools
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36418732013-05-23 A comparison between antenatal care quality in public and private sector in rural Hebei, China Chen, Li Dai, Yaohua Zhang, Yanfeng Wu, Qiong Rudan, Diana Saftić, Vanja van Velthoven, Michelle H.M.M.T. Su, Jianqiang Tan, Zangwen Scherpbier, Robert W. Croat Med J Improving Global Child Health AIM: To evaluate the quality of antenatal care (ANC) in Hebei Province and compare it between the public and private sector and within the public sector. METHODS: We conducted a Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Household Survey in 2010 using a two-stage sampling procedure and included 1079 mothers. The quality of ANC was assessed on the basis of the number of ANC visits, the time of the first ANC visit, 16 different ANC procedures, owning a maternal health care booklet, and the type of service provider. RESULTS: Almost all women (98%) received ANC services at least once, 80% at least four times, and 54% at least five times. About half of the women (46%) visited ANC facility within their first trimester. Neither public nor private sector provided all 16 standardized services, but significantly more women in public sector received ANC procedures. Most women received ANC in county or higher-level hospitals (75%) and very few in township hospitals (8%). Significantly fewer women were weighed and tested for HIV/AIDS in township than in county or higher-level hospitals. CONCLUSION: The quality of ANC in Hebei was poorer than required by China’s national and World Health Organization norms. Although the public sector performed better than the private sector, the utilization and quality of care of ANC services in this sector varied and women generally visited county or higher-level health facilities. Croatian Medical Schools 2013-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3641873/ /pubmed/23630142 http://dx.doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2013.54.146 Text en Copyright © 2013 by the Croatian Medical Journal. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Improving Global Child Health
Chen, Li
Dai, Yaohua
Zhang, Yanfeng
Wu, Qiong
Rudan, Diana
Saftić, Vanja
van Velthoven, Michelle H.M.M.T.
Su, Jianqiang
Tan, Zangwen
Scherpbier, Robert W.
A comparison between antenatal care quality in public and private sector in rural Hebei, China
title A comparison between antenatal care quality in public and private sector in rural Hebei, China
title_full A comparison between antenatal care quality in public and private sector in rural Hebei, China
title_fullStr A comparison between antenatal care quality in public and private sector in rural Hebei, China
title_full_unstemmed A comparison between antenatal care quality in public and private sector in rural Hebei, China
title_short A comparison between antenatal care quality in public and private sector in rural Hebei, China
title_sort comparison between antenatal care quality in public and private sector in rural hebei, china
topic Improving Global Child Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3641873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23630142
http://dx.doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2013.54.146
work_keys_str_mv AT chenli acomparisonbetweenantenatalcarequalityinpublicandprivatesectorinruralhebeichina
AT daiyaohua acomparisonbetweenantenatalcarequalityinpublicandprivatesectorinruralhebeichina
AT zhangyanfeng acomparisonbetweenantenatalcarequalityinpublicandprivatesectorinruralhebeichina
AT wuqiong acomparisonbetweenantenatalcarequalityinpublicandprivatesectorinruralhebeichina
AT rudandiana acomparisonbetweenantenatalcarequalityinpublicandprivatesectorinruralhebeichina
AT safticvanja acomparisonbetweenantenatalcarequalityinpublicandprivatesectorinruralhebeichina
AT vanvelthovenmichellehmmt acomparisonbetweenantenatalcarequalityinpublicandprivatesectorinruralhebeichina
AT sujianqiang acomparisonbetweenantenatalcarequalityinpublicandprivatesectorinruralhebeichina
AT tanzangwen acomparisonbetweenantenatalcarequalityinpublicandprivatesectorinruralhebeichina
AT scherpbierrobertw acomparisonbetweenantenatalcarequalityinpublicandprivatesectorinruralhebeichina
AT chenli comparisonbetweenantenatalcarequalityinpublicandprivatesectorinruralhebeichina
AT daiyaohua comparisonbetweenantenatalcarequalityinpublicandprivatesectorinruralhebeichina
AT zhangyanfeng comparisonbetweenantenatalcarequalityinpublicandprivatesectorinruralhebeichina
AT wuqiong comparisonbetweenantenatalcarequalityinpublicandprivatesectorinruralhebeichina
AT rudandiana comparisonbetweenantenatalcarequalityinpublicandprivatesectorinruralhebeichina
AT safticvanja comparisonbetweenantenatalcarequalityinpublicandprivatesectorinruralhebeichina
AT vanvelthovenmichellehmmt comparisonbetweenantenatalcarequalityinpublicandprivatesectorinruralhebeichina
AT sujianqiang comparisonbetweenantenatalcarequalityinpublicandprivatesectorinruralhebeichina
AT tanzangwen comparisonbetweenantenatalcarequalityinpublicandprivatesectorinruralhebeichina
AT scherpbierrobertw comparisonbetweenantenatalcarequalityinpublicandprivatesectorinruralhebeichina