Cargando…
A comparison between antenatal care quality in public and private sector in rural Hebei, China
AIM: To evaluate the quality of antenatal care (ANC) in Hebei Province and compare it between the public and private sector and within the public sector. METHODS: We conducted a Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Household Survey in 2010 using a two-stage sampling procedure and included 1079 mothers...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Croatian Medical Schools
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3641873/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23630142 http://dx.doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2013.54.146 |
_version_ | 1782268059430420480 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Li Dai, Yaohua Zhang, Yanfeng Wu, Qiong Rudan, Diana Saftić, Vanja van Velthoven, Michelle H.M.M.T. Su, Jianqiang Tan, Zangwen Scherpbier, Robert W. |
author_facet | Chen, Li Dai, Yaohua Zhang, Yanfeng Wu, Qiong Rudan, Diana Saftić, Vanja van Velthoven, Michelle H.M.M.T. Su, Jianqiang Tan, Zangwen Scherpbier, Robert W. |
author_sort | Chen, Li |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To evaluate the quality of antenatal care (ANC) in Hebei Province and compare it between the public and private sector and within the public sector. METHODS: We conducted a Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Household Survey in 2010 using a two-stage sampling procedure and included 1079 mothers. The quality of ANC was assessed on the basis of the number of ANC visits, the time of the first ANC visit, 16 different ANC procedures, owning a maternal health care booklet, and the type of service provider. RESULTS: Almost all women (98%) received ANC services at least once, 80% at least four times, and 54% at least five times. About half of the women (46%) visited ANC facility within their first trimester. Neither public nor private sector provided all 16 standardized services, but significantly more women in public sector received ANC procedures. Most women received ANC in county or higher-level hospitals (75%) and very few in township hospitals (8%). Significantly fewer women were weighed and tested for HIV/AIDS in township than in county or higher-level hospitals. CONCLUSION: The quality of ANC in Hebei was poorer than required by China’s national and World Health Organization norms. Although the public sector performed better than the private sector, the utilization and quality of care of ANC services in this sector varied and women generally visited county or higher-level health facilities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3641873 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Croatian Medical Schools |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36418732013-05-23 A comparison between antenatal care quality in public and private sector in rural Hebei, China Chen, Li Dai, Yaohua Zhang, Yanfeng Wu, Qiong Rudan, Diana Saftić, Vanja van Velthoven, Michelle H.M.M.T. Su, Jianqiang Tan, Zangwen Scherpbier, Robert W. Croat Med J Improving Global Child Health AIM: To evaluate the quality of antenatal care (ANC) in Hebei Province and compare it between the public and private sector and within the public sector. METHODS: We conducted a Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Household Survey in 2010 using a two-stage sampling procedure and included 1079 mothers. The quality of ANC was assessed on the basis of the number of ANC visits, the time of the first ANC visit, 16 different ANC procedures, owning a maternal health care booklet, and the type of service provider. RESULTS: Almost all women (98%) received ANC services at least once, 80% at least four times, and 54% at least five times. About half of the women (46%) visited ANC facility within their first trimester. Neither public nor private sector provided all 16 standardized services, but significantly more women in public sector received ANC procedures. Most women received ANC in county or higher-level hospitals (75%) and very few in township hospitals (8%). Significantly fewer women were weighed and tested for HIV/AIDS in township than in county or higher-level hospitals. CONCLUSION: The quality of ANC in Hebei was poorer than required by China’s national and World Health Organization norms. Although the public sector performed better than the private sector, the utilization and quality of care of ANC services in this sector varied and women generally visited county or higher-level health facilities. Croatian Medical Schools 2013-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3641873/ /pubmed/23630142 http://dx.doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2013.54.146 Text en Copyright © 2013 by the Croatian Medical Journal. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Improving Global Child Health Chen, Li Dai, Yaohua Zhang, Yanfeng Wu, Qiong Rudan, Diana Saftić, Vanja van Velthoven, Michelle H.M.M.T. Su, Jianqiang Tan, Zangwen Scherpbier, Robert W. A comparison between antenatal care quality in public and private sector in rural Hebei, China |
title | A comparison between antenatal care quality in public and private sector in rural Hebei, China |
title_full | A comparison between antenatal care quality in public and private sector in rural Hebei, China |
title_fullStr | A comparison between antenatal care quality in public and private sector in rural Hebei, China |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison between antenatal care quality in public and private sector in rural Hebei, China |
title_short | A comparison between antenatal care quality in public and private sector in rural Hebei, China |
title_sort | comparison between antenatal care quality in public and private sector in rural hebei, china |
topic | Improving Global Child Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3641873/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23630142 http://dx.doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2013.54.146 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenli acomparisonbetweenantenatalcarequalityinpublicandprivatesectorinruralhebeichina AT daiyaohua acomparisonbetweenantenatalcarequalityinpublicandprivatesectorinruralhebeichina AT zhangyanfeng acomparisonbetweenantenatalcarequalityinpublicandprivatesectorinruralhebeichina AT wuqiong acomparisonbetweenantenatalcarequalityinpublicandprivatesectorinruralhebeichina AT rudandiana acomparisonbetweenantenatalcarequalityinpublicandprivatesectorinruralhebeichina AT safticvanja acomparisonbetweenantenatalcarequalityinpublicandprivatesectorinruralhebeichina AT vanvelthovenmichellehmmt acomparisonbetweenantenatalcarequalityinpublicandprivatesectorinruralhebeichina AT sujianqiang acomparisonbetweenantenatalcarequalityinpublicandprivatesectorinruralhebeichina AT tanzangwen acomparisonbetweenantenatalcarequalityinpublicandprivatesectorinruralhebeichina AT scherpbierrobertw acomparisonbetweenantenatalcarequalityinpublicandprivatesectorinruralhebeichina AT chenli comparisonbetweenantenatalcarequalityinpublicandprivatesectorinruralhebeichina AT daiyaohua comparisonbetweenantenatalcarequalityinpublicandprivatesectorinruralhebeichina AT zhangyanfeng comparisonbetweenantenatalcarequalityinpublicandprivatesectorinruralhebeichina AT wuqiong comparisonbetweenantenatalcarequalityinpublicandprivatesectorinruralhebeichina AT rudandiana comparisonbetweenantenatalcarequalityinpublicandprivatesectorinruralhebeichina AT safticvanja comparisonbetweenantenatalcarequalityinpublicandprivatesectorinruralhebeichina AT vanvelthovenmichellehmmt comparisonbetweenantenatalcarequalityinpublicandprivatesectorinruralhebeichina AT sujianqiang comparisonbetweenantenatalcarequalityinpublicandprivatesectorinruralhebeichina AT tanzangwen comparisonbetweenantenatalcarequalityinpublicandprivatesectorinruralhebeichina AT scherpbierrobertw comparisonbetweenantenatalcarequalityinpublicandprivatesectorinruralhebeichina |