Cargando…

“Whom Should I Pass To?” The More Options the More Attentional Guidance from Working Memory

Three experiments investigated the predictions of the biased competition theory of selective attention in a computer based sport task. According to this theory objects held in the circuitry of working memory (WM) automatically bias attention to objects in a visual scene that match or are related to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Furley, Philip, Memmert, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3642109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23658719
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062278
_version_ 1782268101919768576
author Furley, Philip
Memmert, Daniel
author_facet Furley, Philip
Memmert, Daniel
author_sort Furley, Philip
collection PubMed
description Three experiments investigated the predictions of the biased competition theory of selective attention in a computer based sport task. According to this theory objects held in the circuitry of working memory (WM) automatically bias attention to objects in a visual scene that match or are related to the WM representation. Specifically, we investigated whether certain players that are activated in the circuitry of WM automatically draw attention and receive a competitive advantage in a computer based sport task. In all three experiments participants had to hold an image of a certain player in WM while engaged in a speeded sport task. In Experiment 1 participants had to identify as quickly as possible which player was in possession of the ball. In Experiment 2 and 3 participants had to decide to which player they would pass to in a cartoon team handball situation and a photo picture basketball situation. The results support the biased competition theory of selective attention and suggest that certain decision options receive a competitive advantage if they are associated with the activated contents in the circuitry of WM and that this effect is more pronounced when more decision options compete for attention. A further extension compared to previous research was that the contents of working memory not only biased attention but also actual decisions that can lead to passing errors in sport. We critically discuss the applied implications of the findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3642109
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36421092013-05-08 “Whom Should I Pass To?” The More Options the More Attentional Guidance from Working Memory Furley, Philip Memmert, Daniel PLoS One Research Article Three experiments investigated the predictions of the biased competition theory of selective attention in a computer based sport task. According to this theory objects held in the circuitry of working memory (WM) automatically bias attention to objects in a visual scene that match or are related to the WM representation. Specifically, we investigated whether certain players that are activated in the circuitry of WM automatically draw attention and receive a competitive advantage in a computer based sport task. In all three experiments participants had to hold an image of a certain player in WM while engaged in a speeded sport task. In Experiment 1 participants had to identify as quickly as possible which player was in possession of the ball. In Experiment 2 and 3 participants had to decide to which player they would pass to in a cartoon team handball situation and a photo picture basketball situation. The results support the biased competition theory of selective attention and suggest that certain decision options receive a competitive advantage if they are associated with the activated contents in the circuitry of WM and that this effect is more pronounced when more decision options compete for attention. A further extension compared to previous research was that the contents of working memory not only biased attention but also actual decisions that can lead to passing errors in sport. We critically discuss the applied implications of the findings. Public Library of Science 2013-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3642109/ /pubmed/23658719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062278 Text en © 2013 Furley, Memmert http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Furley, Philip
Memmert, Daniel
“Whom Should I Pass To?” The More Options the More Attentional Guidance from Working Memory
title “Whom Should I Pass To?” The More Options the More Attentional Guidance from Working Memory
title_full “Whom Should I Pass To?” The More Options the More Attentional Guidance from Working Memory
title_fullStr “Whom Should I Pass To?” The More Options the More Attentional Guidance from Working Memory
title_full_unstemmed “Whom Should I Pass To?” The More Options the More Attentional Guidance from Working Memory
title_short “Whom Should I Pass To?” The More Options the More Attentional Guidance from Working Memory
title_sort “whom should i pass to?” the more options the more attentional guidance from working memory
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3642109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23658719
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062278
work_keys_str_mv AT furleyphilip whomshouldipasstothemoreoptionsthemoreattentionalguidancefromworkingmemory
AT memmertdaniel whomshouldipasstothemoreoptionsthemoreattentionalguidancefromworkingmemory