Cargando…
Does Presence of a Mid-Ocean Ridge Enhance Biomass and Biodiversity?
In contrast to generally sparse biological communities in open-ocean settings, seamounts and ridges are perceived as areas of elevated productivity and biodiversity capable of supporting commercial fisheries. We investigated the origin of this apparent biological enhancement over a segment of the No...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3642170/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23658696 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061550 |
_version_ | 1782268115606831104 |
---|---|
author | Priede, Imants G. Bergstad, Odd Aksel Miller, Peter I. Vecchione, Michael Gebruk, Andrey Falkenhaug, Tone Billett, David S. M. Craig, Jessica Dale, Andrew C. Shields, Mark A. Tilstone, Gavin H. Sutton, Tracey T. Gooday, Andrew J. Inall, Mark E. Jones, Daniel O. B. Martinez-Vicente, Victor Menezes, Gui M. Niedzielski, Tomasz Sigurðsson, Þorsteinn Rothe, Nina Rogacheva, Antonina Alt, Claudia H. S. Brand, Timothy Abell, Richard Brierley, Andrew S. Cousins, Nicola J. Crockard, Deborah Hoelzel, A. Rus Høines, Åge Letessier, Tom B. Read, Jane F. Shimmield, Tracy Cox, Martin J. Galbraith, John K. Gordon, John D. M. Horton, Tammy Neat, Francis Lorance, Pascal |
author_facet | Priede, Imants G. Bergstad, Odd Aksel Miller, Peter I. Vecchione, Michael Gebruk, Andrey Falkenhaug, Tone Billett, David S. M. Craig, Jessica Dale, Andrew C. Shields, Mark A. Tilstone, Gavin H. Sutton, Tracey T. Gooday, Andrew J. Inall, Mark E. Jones, Daniel O. B. Martinez-Vicente, Victor Menezes, Gui M. Niedzielski, Tomasz Sigurðsson, Þorsteinn Rothe, Nina Rogacheva, Antonina Alt, Claudia H. S. Brand, Timothy Abell, Richard Brierley, Andrew S. Cousins, Nicola J. Crockard, Deborah Hoelzel, A. Rus Høines, Åge Letessier, Tom B. Read, Jane F. Shimmield, Tracy Cox, Martin J. Galbraith, John K. Gordon, John D. M. Horton, Tammy Neat, Francis Lorance, Pascal |
author_sort | Priede, Imants G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In contrast to generally sparse biological communities in open-ocean settings, seamounts and ridges are perceived as areas of elevated productivity and biodiversity capable of supporting commercial fisheries. We investigated the origin of this apparent biological enhancement over a segment of the North Mid-Atlantic Ridge (MAR) using sonar, corers, trawls, traps, and a remotely operated vehicle to survey habitat, biomass, and biodiversity. Satellite remote sensing provided information on flow patterns, thermal fronts, and primary production, while sediment traps measured export flux during 2007–2010. The MAR, 3,704,404 km(2) in area, accounts for 44.7% lower bathyal habitat (800–3500 m depth) in the North Atlantic and is dominated by fine soft sediment substrate (95% of area) on a series of flat terraces with intervening slopes either side of the ridge axis contributing to habitat heterogeneity. The MAR fauna comprises mainly species known from continental margins with no evidence of greater biodiversity. Primary production and export flux over the MAR were not enhanced compared with a nearby reference station over the Porcupine Abyssal Plain. Biomasses of benthic macrofauna and megafauna were similar to global averages at the same depths totalling an estimated 258.9 kt C over the entire lower bathyal north MAR. A hypothetical flat plain at 3500 m depth in place of the MAR would contain 85.6 kt C, implying an increase of 173.3 kt C attributable to the presence of the Ridge. This is approximately equal to 167 kt C of estimated pelagic biomass displaced by the volume of the MAR. There is no enhancement of biological productivity over the MAR; oceanic bathypelagic species are replaced by benthic fauna otherwise unable to survive in the mid ocean. We propose that globally sea floor elevation has no effect on deep sea biomass; pelagic plus benthic biomass is constant within a given surface productivity regime. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3642170 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36421702013-05-08 Does Presence of a Mid-Ocean Ridge Enhance Biomass and Biodiversity? Priede, Imants G. Bergstad, Odd Aksel Miller, Peter I. Vecchione, Michael Gebruk, Andrey Falkenhaug, Tone Billett, David S. M. Craig, Jessica Dale, Andrew C. Shields, Mark A. Tilstone, Gavin H. Sutton, Tracey T. Gooday, Andrew J. Inall, Mark E. Jones, Daniel O. B. Martinez-Vicente, Victor Menezes, Gui M. Niedzielski, Tomasz Sigurðsson, Þorsteinn Rothe, Nina Rogacheva, Antonina Alt, Claudia H. S. Brand, Timothy Abell, Richard Brierley, Andrew S. Cousins, Nicola J. Crockard, Deborah Hoelzel, A. Rus Høines, Åge Letessier, Tom B. Read, Jane F. Shimmield, Tracy Cox, Martin J. Galbraith, John K. Gordon, John D. M. Horton, Tammy Neat, Francis Lorance, Pascal PLoS One Research Article In contrast to generally sparse biological communities in open-ocean settings, seamounts and ridges are perceived as areas of elevated productivity and biodiversity capable of supporting commercial fisheries. We investigated the origin of this apparent biological enhancement over a segment of the North Mid-Atlantic Ridge (MAR) using sonar, corers, trawls, traps, and a remotely operated vehicle to survey habitat, biomass, and biodiversity. Satellite remote sensing provided information on flow patterns, thermal fronts, and primary production, while sediment traps measured export flux during 2007–2010. The MAR, 3,704,404 km(2) in area, accounts for 44.7% lower bathyal habitat (800–3500 m depth) in the North Atlantic and is dominated by fine soft sediment substrate (95% of area) on a series of flat terraces with intervening slopes either side of the ridge axis contributing to habitat heterogeneity. The MAR fauna comprises mainly species known from continental margins with no evidence of greater biodiversity. Primary production and export flux over the MAR were not enhanced compared with a nearby reference station over the Porcupine Abyssal Plain. Biomasses of benthic macrofauna and megafauna were similar to global averages at the same depths totalling an estimated 258.9 kt C over the entire lower bathyal north MAR. A hypothetical flat plain at 3500 m depth in place of the MAR would contain 85.6 kt C, implying an increase of 173.3 kt C attributable to the presence of the Ridge. This is approximately equal to 167 kt C of estimated pelagic biomass displaced by the volume of the MAR. There is no enhancement of biological productivity over the MAR; oceanic bathypelagic species are replaced by benthic fauna otherwise unable to survive in the mid ocean. We propose that globally sea floor elevation has no effect on deep sea biomass; pelagic plus benthic biomass is constant within a given surface productivity regime. Public Library of Science 2013-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3642170/ /pubmed/23658696 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061550 Text en © 2013 Priede et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Priede, Imants G. Bergstad, Odd Aksel Miller, Peter I. Vecchione, Michael Gebruk, Andrey Falkenhaug, Tone Billett, David S. M. Craig, Jessica Dale, Andrew C. Shields, Mark A. Tilstone, Gavin H. Sutton, Tracey T. Gooday, Andrew J. Inall, Mark E. Jones, Daniel O. B. Martinez-Vicente, Victor Menezes, Gui M. Niedzielski, Tomasz Sigurðsson, Þorsteinn Rothe, Nina Rogacheva, Antonina Alt, Claudia H. S. Brand, Timothy Abell, Richard Brierley, Andrew S. Cousins, Nicola J. Crockard, Deborah Hoelzel, A. Rus Høines, Åge Letessier, Tom B. Read, Jane F. Shimmield, Tracy Cox, Martin J. Galbraith, John K. Gordon, John D. M. Horton, Tammy Neat, Francis Lorance, Pascal Does Presence of a Mid-Ocean Ridge Enhance Biomass and Biodiversity? |
title | Does Presence of a Mid-Ocean Ridge Enhance Biomass and Biodiversity? |
title_full | Does Presence of a Mid-Ocean Ridge Enhance Biomass and Biodiversity? |
title_fullStr | Does Presence of a Mid-Ocean Ridge Enhance Biomass and Biodiversity? |
title_full_unstemmed | Does Presence of a Mid-Ocean Ridge Enhance Biomass and Biodiversity? |
title_short | Does Presence of a Mid-Ocean Ridge Enhance Biomass and Biodiversity? |
title_sort | does presence of a mid-ocean ridge enhance biomass and biodiversity? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3642170/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23658696 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061550 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT priedeimantsg doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity AT bergstadoddaksel doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity AT millerpeteri doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity AT vecchionemichael doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity AT gebrukandrey doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity AT falkenhaugtone doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity AT billettdavidsm doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity AT craigjessica doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity AT daleandrewc doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity AT shieldsmarka doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity AT tilstonegavinh doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity AT suttontraceyt doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity AT goodayandrewj doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity AT inallmarke doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity AT jonesdanielob doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity AT martinezvicentevictor doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity AT menezesguim doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity AT niedzielskitomasz doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity AT sigurðssonþorsteinn doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity AT rothenina doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity AT rogachevaantonina doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity AT altclaudiahs doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity AT brandtimothy doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity AT abellrichard doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity AT brierleyandrews doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity AT cousinsnicolaj doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity AT crockarddeborah doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity AT hoelzelarus doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity AT høinesage doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity AT letessiertomb doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity AT readjanef doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity AT shimmieldtracy doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity AT coxmartinj doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity AT galbraithjohnk doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity AT gordonjohndm doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity AT hortontammy doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity AT neatfrancis doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity AT lorancepascal doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity |