_version_ 1782268115606831104
author Priede, Imants G.
Bergstad, Odd Aksel
Miller, Peter I.
Vecchione, Michael
Gebruk, Andrey
Falkenhaug, Tone
Billett, David S. M.
Craig, Jessica
Dale, Andrew C.
Shields, Mark A.
Tilstone, Gavin H.
Sutton, Tracey T.
Gooday, Andrew J.
Inall, Mark E.
Jones, Daniel O. B.
Martinez-Vicente, Victor
Menezes, Gui M.
Niedzielski, Tomasz
Sigurðsson, Þorsteinn
Rothe, Nina
Rogacheva, Antonina
Alt, Claudia H. S.
Brand, Timothy
Abell, Richard
Brierley, Andrew S.
Cousins, Nicola J.
Crockard, Deborah
Hoelzel, A. Rus
Høines, Åge
Letessier, Tom B.
Read, Jane F.
Shimmield, Tracy
Cox, Martin J.
Galbraith, John K.
Gordon, John D. M.
Horton, Tammy
Neat, Francis
Lorance, Pascal
author_facet Priede, Imants G.
Bergstad, Odd Aksel
Miller, Peter I.
Vecchione, Michael
Gebruk, Andrey
Falkenhaug, Tone
Billett, David S. M.
Craig, Jessica
Dale, Andrew C.
Shields, Mark A.
Tilstone, Gavin H.
Sutton, Tracey T.
Gooday, Andrew J.
Inall, Mark E.
Jones, Daniel O. B.
Martinez-Vicente, Victor
Menezes, Gui M.
Niedzielski, Tomasz
Sigurðsson, Þorsteinn
Rothe, Nina
Rogacheva, Antonina
Alt, Claudia H. S.
Brand, Timothy
Abell, Richard
Brierley, Andrew S.
Cousins, Nicola J.
Crockard, Deborah
Hoelzel, A. Rus
Høines, Åge
Letessier, Tom B.
Read, Jane F.
Shimmield, Tracy
Cox, Martin J.
Galbraith, John K.
Gordon, John D. M.
Horton, Tammy
Neat, Francis
Lorance, Pascal
author_sort Priede, Imants G.
collection PubMed
description In contrast to generally sparse biological communities in open-ocean settings, seamounts and ridges are perceived as areas of elevated productivity and biodiversity capable of supporting commercial fisheries. We investigated the origin of this apparent biological enhancement over a segment of the North Mid-Atlantic Ridge (MAR) using sonar, corers, trawls, traps, and a remotely operated vehicle to survey habitat, biomass, and biodiversity. Satellite remote sensing provided information on flow patterns, thermal fronts, and primary production, while sediment traps measured export flux during 2007–2010. The MAR, 3,704,404 km(2) in area, accounts for 44.7% lower bathyal habitat (800–3500 m depth) in the North Atlantic and is dominated by fine soft sediment substrate (95% of area) on a series of flat terraces with intervening slopes either side of the ridge axis contributing to habitat heterogeneity. The MAR fauna comprises mainly species known from continental margins with no evidence of greater biodiversity. Primary production and export flux over the MAR were not enhanced compared with a nearby reference station over the Porcupine Abyssal Plain. Biomasses of benthic macrofauna and megafauna were similar to global averages at the same depths totalling an estimated 258.9 kt C over the entire lower bathyal north MAR. A hypothetical flat plain at 3500 m depth in place of the MAR would contain 85.6 kt C, implying an increase of 173.3 kt C attributable to the presence of the Ridge. This is approximately equal to 167 kt C of estimated pelagic biomass displaced by the volume of the MAR. There is no enhancement of biological productivity over the MAR; oceanic bathypelagic species are replaced by benthic fauna otherwise unable to survive in the mid ocean. We propose that globally sea floor elevation has no effect on deep sea biomass; pelagic plus benthic biomass is constant within a given surface productivity regime.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3642170
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36421702013-05-08 Does Presence of a Mid-Ocean Ridge Enhance Biomass and Biodiversity? Priede, Imants G. Bergstad, Odd Aksel Miller, Peter I. Vecchione, Michael Gebruk, Andrey Falkenhaug, Tone Billett, David S. M. Craig, Jessica Dale, Andrew C. Shields, Mark A. Tilstone, Gavin H. Sutton, Tracey T. Gooday, Andrew J. Inall, Mark E. Jones, Daniel O. B. Martinez-Vicente, Victor Menezes, Gui M. Niedzielski, Tomasz Sigurðsson, Þorsteinn Rothe, Nina Rogacheva, Antonina Alt, Claudia H. S. Brand, Timothy Abell, Richard Brierley, Andrew S. Cousins, Nicola J. Crockard, Deborah Hoelzel, A. Rus Høines, Åge Letessier, Tom B. Read, Jane F. Shimmield, Tracy Cox, Martin J. Galbraith, John K. Gordon, John D. M. Horton, Tammy Neat, Francis Lorance, Pascal PLoS One Research Article In contrast to generally sparse biological communities in open-ocean settings, seamounts and ridges are perceived as areas of elevated productivity and biodiversity capable of supporting commercial fisheries. We investigated the origin of this apparent biological enhancement over a segment of the North Mid-Atlantic Ridge (MAR) using sonar, corers, trawls, traps, and a remotely operated vehicle to survey habitat, biomass, and biodiversity. Satellite remote sensing provided information on flow patterns, thermal fronts, and primary production, while sediment traps measured export flux during 2007–2010. The MAR, 3,704,404 km(2) in area, accounts for 44.7% lower bathyal habitat (800–3500 m depth) in the North Atlantic and is dominated by fine soft sediment substrate (95% of area) on a series of flat terraces with intervening slopes either side of the ridge axis contributing to habitat heterogeneity. The MAR fauna comprises mainly species known from continental margins with no evidence of greater biodiversity. Primary production and export flux over the MAR were not enhanced compared with a nearby reference station over the Porcupine Abyssal Plain. Biomasses of benthic macrofauna and megafauna were similar to global averages at the same depths totalling an estimated 258.9 kt C over the entire lower bathyal north MAR. A hypothetical flat plain at 3500 m depth in place of the MAR would contain 85.6 kt C, implying an increase of 173.3 kt C attributable to the presence of the Ridge. This is approximately equal to 167 kt C of estimated pelagic biomass displaced by the volume of the MAR. There is no enhancement of biological productivity over the MAR; oceanic bathypelagic species are replaced by benthic fauna otherwise unable to survive in the mid ocean. We propose that globally sea floor elevation has no effect on deep sea biomass; pelagic plus benthic biomass is constant within a given surface productivity regime. Public Library of Science 2013-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3642170/ /pubmed/23658696 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061550 Text en © 2013 Priede et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Priede, Imants G.
Bergstad, Odd Aksel
Miller, Peter I.
Vecchione, Michael
Gebruk, Andrey
Falkenhaug, Tone
Billett, David S. M.
Craig, Jessica
Dale, Andrew C.
Shields, Mark A.
Tilstone, Gavin H.
Sutton, Tracey T.
Gooday, Andrew J.
Inall, Mark E.
Jones, Daniel O. B.
Martinez-Vicente, Victor
Menezes, Gui M.
Niedzielski, Tomasz
Sigurðsson, Þorsteinn
Rothe, Nina
Rogacheva, Antonina
Alt, Claudia H. S.
Brand, Timothy
Abell, Richard
Brierley, Andrew S.
Cousins, Nicola J.
Crockard, Deborah
Hoelzel, A. Rus
Høines, Åge
Letessier, Tom B.
Read, Jane F.
Shimmield, Tracy
Cox, Martin J.
Galbraith, John K.
Gordon, John D. M.
Horton, Tammy
Neat, Francis
Lorance, Pascal
Does Presence of a Mid-Ocean Ridge Enhance Biomass and Biodiversity?
title Does Presence of a Mid-Ocean Ridge Enhance Biomass and Biodiversity?
title_full Does Presence of a Mid-Ocean Ridge Enhance Biomass and Biodiversity?
title_fullStr Does Presence of a Mid-Ocean Ridge Enhance Biomass and Biodiversity?
title_full_unstemmed Does Presence of a Mid-Ocean Ridge Enhance Biomass and Biodiversity?
title_short Does Presence of a Mid-Ocean Ridge Enhance Biomass and Biodiversity?
title_sort does presence of a mid-ocean ridge enhance biomass and biodiversity?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3642170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23658696
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061550
work_keys_str_mv AT priedeimantsg doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity
AT bergstadoddaksel doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity
AT millerpeteri doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity
AT vecchionemichael doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity
AT gebrukandrey doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity
AT falkenhaugtone doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity
AT billettdavidsm doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity
AT craigjessica doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity
AT daleandrewc doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity
AT shieldsmarka doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity
AT tilstonegavinh doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity
AT suttontraceyt doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity
AT goodayandrewj doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity
AT inallmarke doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity
AT jonesdanielob doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity
AT martinezvicentevictor doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity
AT menezesguim doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity
AT niedzielskitomasz doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity
AT sigurðssonþorsteinn doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity
AT rothenina doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity
AT rogachevaantonina doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity
AT altclaudiahs doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity
AT brandtimothy doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity
AT abellrichard doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity
AT brierleyandrews doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity
AT cousinsnicolaj doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity
AT crockarddeborah doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity
AT hoelzelarus doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity
AT høinesage doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity
AT letessiertomb doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity
AT readjanef doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity
AT shimmieldtracy doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity
AT coxmartinj doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity
AT galbraithjohnk doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity
AT gordonjohndm doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity
AT hortontammy doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity
AT neatfrancis doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity
AT lorancepascal doespresenceofamidoceanridgeenhancebiomassandbiodiversity