Cargando…
Substantial Agreement of Referee Recommendations at a General Medical Journal – A Peer Review Evaluation at Deutsches Ärzteblatt International
BACKGROUND: Peer review is the mainstay of editorial decision making for medical journals. There is a dearth of evaluations of journal peer review with regard to reliability and validity, particularly in the light of the wide variety of medical journals. Studies carried out so far indicate low agree...
Autores principales: | Baethge, Christopher, Franklin, Jeremy, Mertens, Stephan |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3642182/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23658692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061401 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals
por: Bravo, Giangiacomo, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
An Analysis of 2.3 Million Participations in the Continuing Medical Education Program of a General Medical Journal: Suitability, User Characteristics, and Evaluation by Readers
por: Christ, Hildegard, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Cooperation between Referees and Authors Increases Peer Review Accuracy
por: Leek, Jeffrey T., et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Generalized Quantum Deutsch-Jozsa Algorithm
por: Arodz, Tomasz
Publicado: (2020) -
Editorial Peer Reviewers' Recommendations at a General Medical Journal: Are They Reliable and Do Editors Care?
por: Kravitz, Richard L., et al.
Publicado: (2010)