Cargando…

Whose name is it anyway? Varying patterns of possessive usage in eponymous neurodegenerative diseases

There has been long-standing debate over whether use of the possessive form of the names of eponymous neurological disorders should be abandoned. Which view has actually predominated in practice? We empirically assessed current and historical usage in the scientific literature. The PubMed database w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: MacAskill, Michael R., Anderson, Tim J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3642700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23646286
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.67
_version_ 1782268196550606848
author MacAskill, Michael R.
Anderson, Tim J.
author_facet MacAskill, Michael R.
Anderson, Tim J.
author_sort MacAskill, Michael R.
collection PubMed
description There has been long-standing debate over whether use of the possessive form of the names of eponymous neurological disorders should be abandoned. Which view has actually predominated in practice? We empirically assessed current and historical usage in the scientific literature. The PubMed database was queried for the percentage of titles published each year from 1960–2012 which contained the possessive form of Parkinson’s (PD), Alzheimer’s (AD), Huntington’s (HD), Wilson’s (WD), and Gaucher’s (GD) diseases (e.g. Huntington’s disease or chorea vs Huntington disease or chorea). Down syndrome (DS), well known for its changes in terminology, was used as a reference. The possessive form was nearly universal in all conditions from 1960 until the early 1970s. In both DS and GD it then declined at an approximately constant rate of 2 percentage points per year to drop below 15%. The possessive forms of both PD and AD began to decline at the same time but stabilised and have since remained above 80%, with a similar but more volatile pattern in HD. WD, meanwhile, is intermediate between the DS/GD and PD/AD/HD patterns, with a slower decline to its current value of approximately 60%. Declining possessive form usage in GD and DS papers has been remarkably uniform over time and has nearly reached completion. PD and AD appear stable in remaining predominantly possessive. The larger volume of papers published in those fields and their possibly greater public recognition and involvement may make that unlikely to change in the short-term. In a secondary analysis restricted to PD, we found that practices have switched dramatically several times in each of three US-published general neurology journals. Meanwhile, in two UK-published journals, and in the specialist title “Movement Disorders”, the possessive form has been maintained consistently. The use of eponyms in neurology shows systematic variation across time, disorders, and journals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3642700
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36427002013-05-03 Whose name is it anyway? Varying patterns of possessive usage in eponymous neurodegenerative diseases MacAskill, Michael R. Anderson, Tim J. Peerj Cognitive Disorders There has been long-standing debate over whether use of the possessive form of the names of eponymous neurological disorders should be abandoned. Which view has actually predominated in practice? We empirically assessed current and historical usage in the scientific literature. The PubMed database was queried for the percentage of titles published each year from 1960–2012 which contained the possessive form of Parkinson’s (PD), Alzheimer’s (AD), Huntington’s (HD), Wilson’s (WD), and Gaucher’s (GD) diseases (e.g. Huntington’s disease or chorea vs Huntington disease or chorea). Down syndrome (DS), well known for its changes in terminology, was used as a reference. The possessive form was nearly universal in all conditions from 1960 until the early 1970s. In both DS and GD it then declined at an approximately constant rate of 2 percentage points per year to drop below 15%. The possessive forms of both PD and AD began to decline at the same time but stabilised and have since remained above 80%, with a similar but more volatile pattern in HD. WD, meanwhile, is intermediate between the DS/GD and PD/AD/HD patterns, with a slower decline to its current value of approximately 60%. Declining possessive form usage in GD and DS papers has been remarkably uniform over time and has nearly reached completion. PD and AD appear stable in remaining predominantly possessive. The larger volume of papers published in those fields and their possibly greater public recognition and involvement may make that unlikely to change in the short-term. In a secondary analysis restricted to PD, we found that practices have switched dramatically several times in each of three US-published general neurology journals. Meanwhile, in two UK-published journals, and in the specialist title “Movement Disorders”, the possessive form has been maintained consistently. The use of eponyms in neurology shows systematic variation across time, disorders, and journals. PeerJ Inc. 2013-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3642700/ /pubmed/23646286 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.67 Text en © 2013 MacAskill and Anderson http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Cognitive Disorders
MacAskill, Michael R.
Anderson, Tim J.
Whose name is it anyway? Varying patterns of possessive usage in eponymous neurodegenerative diseases
title Whose name is it anyway? Varying patterns of possessive usage in eponymous neurodegenerative diseases
title_full Whose name is it anyway? Varying patterns of possessive usage in eponymous neurodegenerative diseases
title_fullStr Whose name is it anyway? Varying patterns of possessive usage in eponymous neurodegenerative diseases
title_full_unstemmed Whose name is it anyway? Varying patterns of possessive usage in eponymous neurodegenerative diseases
title_short Whose name is it anyway? Varying patterns of possessive usage in eponymous neurodegenerative diseases
title_sort whose name is it anyway? varying patterns of possessive usage in eponymous neurodegenerative diseases
topic Cognitive Disorders
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3642700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23646286
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.67
work_keys_str_mv AT macaskillmichaelr whosenameisitanywayvaryingpatternsofpossessiveusageineponymousneurodegenerativediseases
AT andersontimj whosenameisitanywayvaryingpatternsofpossessiveusageineponymousneurodegenerativediseases