Cargando…
Whose name is it anyway? Varying patterns of possessive usage in eponymous neurodegenerative diseases
There has been long-standing debate over whether use of the possessive form of the names of eponymous neurological disorders should be abandoned. Which view has actually predominated in practice? We empirically assessed current and historical usage in the scientific literature. The PubMed database w...
Autores principales: | MacAskill, Michael R., Anderson, Tim J. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3642700/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23646286 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.67 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Whose Duty Is it Anyway?
por: Anand, Akshay, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Examining the influence of picture format on children’s naming responses
por: Martínez, Naroa, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Time usage analysis according to occupational area and satisfaction level in family caregivers of dementia patients
por: Jang, Woo-Hyuk, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
The question of authorship: Whose research is it anyway?
por: Thatte, Mukund
Publicado: (2010) -
From the editor’s desk: Whose case is it, anyway?
por: Heller, Matthew T., et al.
Publicado: (2015)