Cargando…

Utility of penicillin allergy testing in patients presenting with a history of penicillin allergy

BACKGROUND: Current statistics show that approximately 10% of patients claim to be allergic to penicillin yet only 10% of these have demonstrable allergy. The most appropriate and cost-effective antibiotics are sometimes withheld on the basis of patient history of drug allergy. OBJECTIVE: Investigat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sagar, Priyanka S, Katelaris, Constance H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Asia Pacific Association of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3643063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23667835
http://dx.doi.org/10.5415/apallergy.2013.3.2.115
_version_ 1782268257148862464
author Sagar, Priyanka S
Katelaris, Constance H
author_facet Sagar, Priyanka S
Katelaris, Constance H
author_sort Sagar, Priyanka S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Current statistics show that approximately 10% of patients claim to be allergic to penicillin yet only 10% of these have demonstrable allergy. The most appropriate and cost-effective antibiotics are sometimes withheld on the basis of patient history of drug allergy. OBJECTIVE: Investigation of IgE hypersensitivity and delayed hypersensitivity in patients with a history of penicillin allergy to a teaching hospital allergy clinic. METHODS: Patients underwent skin prick and intradermal testing (IDT) with major and minor penicillin determinants. Those with negative skin tests were administered a three-day oral challenge. Demographic and clinical details about the reactions were noted. RESULTS: One hundred twenty eight patients underwent testing, of these, one hundred and ten had self-reported histories of penicillin allergy and eighteen were referred because of other antibiotic allergies. Seventeen patients with self-reported penicillin allergy had either positive skin tests or oral challenge results, corresponding to 15% of patients having proven allergy. None reacted on skin prick testing, four reacted to IDT, thirteen reacted to oral challenge (five immediate and eight delayed). Analysis of clinical histories showed that patients with a well-defined history of allergy and a history of anaphylaxis were more likely to have a positive test compared to patients with vague histories. Skin testing proved to be less sensitive than oral challenge. CONCLUSION: A minority of patients presenting with a history of penicillin allergy have evidence of immune-mediated hypersensitivity (17/110, 15%) in this study. Of these, eight out of seventeen (47%) had delayed reactions, demonstrating the usefulness and discriminating power of objective testing, which must include three-day oral challenge. Discriminating factors for immune-mediated allergy from patient history were a clear description of the original reaction and a history of anaphylaxis. Negative allergy testing enables the use of penicillin as first-line treatment when necessary and this can significantly reduce costs of antibiotics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3643063
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Asia Pacific Association of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36430632013-05-10 Utility of penicillin allergy testing in patients presenting with a history of penicillin allergy Sagar, Priyanka S Katelaris, Constance H Asia Pac Allergy Original Article BACKGROUND: Current statistics show that approximately 10% of patients claim to be allergic to penicillin yet only 10% of these have demonstrable allergy. The most appropriate and cost-effective antibiotics are sometimes withheld on the basis of patient history of drug allergy. OBJECTIVE: Investigation of IgE hypersensitivity and delayed hypersensitivity in patients with a history of penicillin allergy to a teaching hospital allergy clinic. METHODS: Patients underwent skin prick and intradermal testing (IDT) with major and minor penicillin determinants. Those with negative skin tests were administered a three-day oral challenge. Demographic and clinical details about the reactions were noted. RESULTS: One hundred twenty eight patients underwent testing, of these, one hundred and ten had self-reported histories of penicillin allergy and eighteen were referred because of other antibiotic allergies. Seventeen patients with self-reported penicillin allergy had either positive skin tests or oral challenge results, corresponding to 15% of patients having proven allergy. None reacted on skin prick testing, four reacted to IDT, thirteen reacted to oral challenge (five immediate and eight delayed). Analysis of clinical histories showed that patients with a well-defined history of allergy and a history of anaphylaxis were more likely to have a positive test compared to patients with vague histories. Skin testing proved to be less sensitive than oral challenge. CONCLUSION: A minority of patients presenting with a history of penicillin allergy have evidence of immune-mediated hypersensitivity (17/110, 15%) in this study. Of these, eight out of seventeen (47%) had delayed reactions, demonstrating the usefulness and discriminating power of objective testing, which must include three-day oral challenge. Discriminating factors for immune-mediated allergy from patient history were a clear description of the original reaction and a history of anaphylaxis. Negative allergy testing enables the use of penicillin as first-line treatment when necessary and this can significantly reduce costs of antibiotics. Asia Pacific Association of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology 2013-04 2013-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3643063/ /pubmed/23667835 http://dx.doi.org/10.5415/apallergy.2013.3.2.115 Text en Copyright © 2013. Asia Pacific Association of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sagar, Priyanka S
Katelaris, Constance H
Utility of penicillin allergy testing in patients presenting with a history of penicillin allergy
title Utility of penicillin allergy testing in patients presenting with a history of penicillin allergy
title_full Utility of penicillin allergy testing in patients presenting with a history of penicillin allergy
title_fullStr Utility of penicillin allergy testing in patients presenting with a history of penicillin allergy
title_full_unstemmed Utility of penicillin allergy testing in patients presenting with a history of penicillin allergy
title_short Utility of penicillin allergy testing in patients presenting with a history of penicillin allergy
title_sort utility of penicillin allergy testing in patients presenting with a history of penicillin allergy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3643063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23667835
http://dx.doi.org/10.5415/apallergy.2013.3.2.115
work_keys_str_mv AT sagarpriyankas utilityofpenicillinallergytestinginpatientspresentingwithahistoryofpenicillinallergy
AT katelarisconstanceh utilityofpenicillinallergytestinginpatientspresentingwithahistoryofpenicillinallergy