Cargando…

Where do we stand with IPF treatment?

Despite receiving ‘weak no’ recommendations in the updated guidelines on treating patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF), two key treatment options are pirfenidone and N-acetylcysteine (NAC), and both are used in clinical practice. The efficacy of pirfenidone is supported by a number of P...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Albera, C, Ferrero, C, Rindone, E, Zanotto, S, Rizza, E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3643087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23734956
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-14-S1-S7
_version_ 1782268262564757504
author Albera, C
Ferrero, C
Rindone, E
Zanotto, S
Rizza, E
author_facet Albera, C
Ferrero, C
Rindone, E
Zanotto, S
Rizza, E
author_sort Albera, C
collection PubMed
description Despite receiving ‘weak no’ recommendations in the updated guidelines on treating patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF), two key treatment options are pirfenidone and N-acetylcysteine (NAC), and both are used in clinical practice. The efficacy of pirfenidone is supported by a number of Phase III trials as well as a Cochrane meta-analysis. Tolerability data are also provided by clinical trials and a long-term extension phase of these studies. Pirfenidone is approved in Europe for the treatment of patients with mild-to-moderate IPF. NAC-based therapy has no such approval, but is commonly used to treat patients. A Phase III trial suggested some benefit of the NAC, prednisone and azathioprine regimen for IPF patients, but the study had many limitations. A further study to investigate this regimen, compared with a placebo alone arm, was recently stopped due to increased mortality in the triple-therapy arm. Discussion of these data and recent findings highlight the importance of a further update to the existing guidelines, so that IPF specialists can provide the most up-to-date advice and treatment to patients in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3643087
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36430872013-05-09 Where do we stand with IPF treatment? Albera, C Ferrero, C Rindone, E Zanotto, S Rizza, E Respir Res Review Despite receiving ‘weak no’ recommendations in the updated guidelines on treating patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF), two key treatment options are pirfenidone and N-acetylcysteine (NAC), and both are used in clinical practice. The efficacy of pirfenidone is supported by a number of Phase III trials as well as a Cochrane meta-analysis. Tolerability data are also provided by clinical trials and a long-term extension phase of these studies. Pirfenidone is approved in Europe for the treatment of patients with mild-to-moderate IPF. NAC-based therapy has no such approval, but is commonly used to treat patients. A Phase III trial suggested some benefit of the NAC, prednisone and azathioprine regimen for IPF patients, but the study had many limitations. A further study to investigate this regimen, compared with a placebo alone arm, was recently stopped due to increased mortality in the triple-therapy arm. Discussion of these data and recent findings highlight the importance of a further update to the existing guidelines, so that IPF specialists can provide the most up-to-date advice and treatment to patients in clinical practice. BioMed Central 2013 2013-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3643087/ /pubmed/23734956 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-14-S1-S7 Text en Copyright © 2013 Albera et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Albera, C
Ferrero, C
Rindone, E
Zanotto, S
Rizza, E
Where do we stand with IPF treatment?
title Where do we stand with IPF treatment?
title_full Where do we stand with IPF treatment?
title_fullStr Where do we stand with IPF treatment?
title_full_unstemmed Where do we stand with IPF treatment?
title_short Where do we stand with IPF treatment?
title_sort where do we stand with ipf treatment?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3643087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23734956
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-14-S1-S7
work_keys_str_mv AT alberac wheredowestandwithipftreatment
AT ferreroc wheredowestandwithipftreatment
AT rindonee wheredowestandwithipftreatment
AT zanottos wheredowestandwithipftreatment
AT rizzae wheredowestandwithipftreatment