Cargando…
Peer review practicalities in clinical medicine
Peer review processes in teaching requires a reviewer to observe a teacher’s practice in a planned manner. Conversation between the two enables the teacher to reflect on their own teaching, promoting self-improvement. Although a central part of the teaching process, and despite its crucial role in c...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3643136/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23745062 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S14279 |
_version_ | 1782268269364772864 |
---|---|
author | Metcalfe, Matthew J Farrant, MAL Farrant, JM |
author_facet | Metcalfe, Matthew J Farrant, MAL Farrant, JM |
author_sort | Metcalfe, Matthew J |
collection | PubMed |
description | Peer review processes in teaching requires a reviewer to observe a teacher’s practice in a planned manner. Conversation between the two enables the teacher to reflect on their own teaching, promoting self-improvement. Although a central part of the teaching process, and despite its crucial role in continuing professional development, peer review is not widely practiced in hospital settings. This article explains the process and its benefits. Practical implementations of the process in busy clinical settings are suggested. Its evaluation and incorporation into undergraduate learning and postgraduate clinical practice are described. With enthusiastic support for colleagues and allowances for its implementation, it should become part of the regular teaching practice, improving the quality of teaching delivered. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3643136 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36431362013-06-06 Peer review practicalities in clinical medicine Metcalfe, Matthew J Farrant, MAL Farrant, JM Adv Med Educ Pract Expert Opinion Peer review processes in teaching requires a reviewer to observe a teacher’s practice in a planned manner. Conversation between the two enables the teacher to reflect on their own teaching, promoting self-improvement. Although a central part of the teaching process, and despite its crucial role in continuing professional development, peer review is not widely practiced in hospital settings. This article explains the process and its benefits. Practical implementations of the process in busy clinical settings are suggested. Its evaluation and incorporation into undergraduate learning and postgraduate clinical practice are described. With enthusiastic support for colleagues and allowances for its implementation, it should become part of the regular teaching practice, improving the quality of teaching delivered. Dove Medical Press 2010-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3643136/ /pubmed/23745062 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S14279 Text en © 2010 Metcalfe et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Expert Opinion Metcalfe, Matthew J Farrant, MAL Farrant, JM Peer review practicalities in clinical medicine |
title | Peer review practicalities in clinical medicine |
title_full | Peer review practicalities in clinical medicine |
title_fullStr | Peer review practicalities in clinical medicine |
title_full_unstemmed | Peer review practicalities in clinical medicine |
title_short | Peer review practicalities in clinical medicine |
title_sort | peer review practicalities in clinical medicine |
topic | Expert Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3643136/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23745062 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S14279 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT metcalfematthewj peerreviewpracticalitiesinclinicalmedicine AT farrantmal peerreviewpracticalitiesinclinicalmedicine AT farrantjm peerreviewpracticalitiesinclinicalmedicine |