Cargando…

Peer review practicalities in clinical medicine

Peer review processes in teaching requires a reviewer to observe a teacher’s practice in a planned manner. Conversation between the two enables the teacher to reflect on their own teaching, promoting self-improvement. Although a central part of the teaching process, and despite its crucial role in c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Metcalfe, Matthew J, Farrant, MAL, Farrant, JM
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3643136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23745062
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S14279
_version_ 1782268269364772864
author Metcalfe, Matthew J
Farrant, MAL
Farrant, JM
author_facet Metcalfe, Matthew J
Farrant, MAL
Farrant, JM
author_sort Metcalfe, Matthew J
collection PubMed
description Peer review processes in teaching requires a reviewer to observe a teacher’s practice in a planned manner. Conversation between the two enables the teacher to reflect on their own teaching, promoting self-improvement. Although a central part of the teaching process, and despite its crucial role in continuing professional development, peer review is not widely practiced in hospital settings. This article explains the process and its benefits. Practical implementations of the process in busy clinical settings are suggested. Its evaluation and incorporation into undergraduate learning and postgraduate clinical practice are described. With enthusiastic support for colleagues and allowances for its implementation, it should become part of the regular teaching practice, improving the quality of teaching delivered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3643136
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36431362013-06-06 Peer review practicalities in clinical medicine Metcalfe, Matthew J Farrant, MAL Farrant, JM Adv Med Educ Pract Expert Opinion Peer review processes in teaching requires a reviewer to observe a teacher’s practice in a planned manner. Conversation between the two enables the teacher to reflect on their own teaching, promoting self-improvement. Although a central part of the teaching process, and despite its crucial role in continuing professional development, peer review is not widely practiced in hospital settings. This article explains the process and its benefits. Practical implementations of the process in busy clinical settings are suggested. Its evaluation and incorporation into undergraduate learning and postgraduate clinical practice are described. With enthusiastic support for colleagues and allowances for its implementation, it should become part of the regular teaching practice, improving the quality of teaching delivered. Dove Medical Press 2010-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3643136/ /pubmed/23745062 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S14279 Text en © 2010 Metcalfe et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Expert Opinion
Metcalfe, Matthew J
Farrant, MAL
Farrant, JM
Peer review practicalities in clinical medicine
title Peer review practicalities in clinical medicine
title_full Peer review practicalities in clinical medicine
title_fullStr Peer review practicalities in clinical medicine
title_full_unstemmed Peer review practicalities in clinical medicine
title_short Peer review practicalities in clinical medicine
title_sort peer review practicalities in clinical medicine
topic Expert Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3643136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23745062
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S14279
work_keys_str_mv AT metcalfematthewj peerreviewpracticalitiesinclinicalmedicine
AT farrantmal peerreviewpracticalitiesinclinicalmedicine
AT farrantjm peerreviewpracticalitiesinclinicalmedicine