Cargando…

Clinical trials of investigational agents for IPF: a review of a Cochrane report

The magnitude of treatment effect can be assessed by a number of methods. One reliable method of collectively analysing data from randomised clinical trials is that used in Cochrane reviews. These systematic reviews identify and analyse the available evidence using the reliable method of meta-analys...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Richeldi, Luca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3643529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23734867
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-14-S1-S4
_version_ 1782268321915207680
author Richeldi, Luca
author_facet Richeldi, Luca
author_sort Richeldi, Luca
collection PubMed
description The magnitude of treatment effect can be assessed by a number of methods. One reliable method of collectively analysing data from randomised clinical trials is that used in Cochrane reviews. These systematic reviews identify and analyse the available evidence using the reliable method of meta-analysis. These often combine data from studies to provide robust evaluations of overall treatment effects. In 2003, a review of data from studies of corticosteroid use in IPF patients found no evidence of a treatment effect. Similarly, very little evidence was found to support the use of immunomodulatory agents. A recent update of these Cochrane reviews failed to identify any new evidence supporting the use of corticosteroids in IPF. However, a review of non-steroid agents for the treatment of IPF identified data from 15 RCTs that was suitable for analysis. Two trials of interferon gamma-1b were pooled and analysed, but no treatment effect was observed in terms of survival. Meta-analysis of three Phase III studies of pirfenidone treatment in IPF patients suggested that progression-free survival was significantly increased by 30%, demonstrating a reduction in the decline of lung function in IPF patients. In addition, there are numerous ongoing trials investigating potential therapeutic agents which provides hope for IPF patients and their doctors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3643529
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36435292013-05-09 Clinical trials of investigational agents for IPF: a review of a Cochrane report Richeldi, Luca Respir Res Review The magnitude of treatment effect can be assessed by a number of methods. One reliable method of collectively analysing data from randomised clinical trials is that used in Cochrane reviews. These systematic reviews identify and analyse the available evidence using the reliable method of meta-analysis. These often combine data from studies to provide robust evaluations of overall treatment effects. In 2003, a review of data from studies of corticosteroid use in IPF patients found no evidence of a treatment effect. Similarly, very little evidence was found to support the use of immunomodulatory agents. A recent update of these Cochrane reviews failed to identify any new evidence supporting the use of corticosteroids in IPF. However, a review of non-steroid agents for the treatment of IPF identified data from 15 RCTs that was suitable for analysis. Two trials of interferon gamma-1b were pooled and analysed, but no treatment effect was observed in terms of survival. Meta-analysis of three Phase III studies of pirfenidone treatment in IPF patients suggested that progression-free survival was significantly increased by 30%, demonstrating a reduction in the decline of lung function in IPF patients. In addition, there are numerous ongoing trials investigating potential therapeutic agents which provides hope for IPF patients and their doctors. BioMed Central 2013 2013-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3643529/ /pubmed/23734867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-14-S1-S4 Text en Copyright © 2013 Richeldi; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Richeldi, Luca
Clinical trials of investigational agents for IPF: a review of a Cochrane report
title Clinical trials of investigational agents for IPF: a review of a Cochrane report
title_full Clinical trials of investigational agents for IPF: a review of a Cochrane report
title_fullStr Clinical trials of investigational agents for IPF: a review of a Cochrane report
title_full_unstemmed Clinical trials of investigational agents for IPF: a review of a Cochrane report
title_short Clinical trials of investigational agents for IPF: a review of a Cochrane report
title_sort clinical trials of investigational agents for ipf: a review of a cochrane report
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3643529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23734867
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-14-S1-S4
work_keys_str_mv AT richeldiluca clinicaltrialsofinvestigationalagentsforipfareviewofacochranereport