Cargando…

“Thinking on your feet”: A qualitative evaluation of sit-stand desks in an Australian workplace

BACKGROUND: Epidemiological research has established sitting as a new risk factor for the development of non-communicable chronic disease. Sit-stand desks have been proposed as one strategy to reduce occupational sedentary time. This formative research study evaluated the acceptability and usability...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grunseit, Anne Carolyn, Chau, Josephine Yuk-Yin, van der Ploeg, Hidde Pieter, Bauman, Adrian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3643835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23597291
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-365
_version_ 1782268379046871040
author Grunseit, Anne Carolyn
Chau, Josephine Yuk-Yin
van der Ploeg, Hidde Pieter
Bauman, Adrian
author_facet Grunseit, Anne Carolyn
Chau, Josephine Yuk-Yin
van der Ploeg, Hidde Pieter
Bauman, Adrian
author_sort Grunseit, Anne Carolyn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Epidemiological research has established sitting as a new risk factor for the development of non-communicable chronic disease. Sit-stand desks have been proposed as one strategy to reduce occupational sedentary time. This formative research study evaluated the acceptability and usability of manually and electrically operated sit-stand desks in a medium-sized government organisation located in Sydney, Australia. METHODS: Sitting time pre- and three months post -installation of the sit-stand desks was measured using validated self-report measures. Additionally, three group interviews and one key-informant interview were conducted with staff regarding perceptions about ease of, and barriers to, use and satisfaction with the sit-stand desks. All interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed for themes regarding usability and acceptability. RESULTS: Of 31 staff, 18 completed baseline questionnaires, and 13 completed follow-up questionnaires. The median proportion of sitting time for work was 85% (range 50%-95%) at baseline and 60% (range 10%-95%) at follow-up. Formal statistical testing of paired data (n=11) showed that the change from baseline to follow-up in time spent sitting (mean change=1.7 hours, p=.014) was statistically significant. From the qualitative data, reasons given for initiating use of the desks in the standing position were the potential health benefits, or a willingness to experiment or through external prompting. Factors influencing continued use included: concern for, and experience of, short and long term health impacts; perceived productivity whilst sitting and standing; practical accommodation of transitions between sitting and standing; electric or manual operation height adjustment. Several trajectories in patterns of initiation and continued use were identified that centered on the source and timing of commitment to using the desk in the standing position. CONCLUSIONS: Sit-stand desks had high usability and acceptability and reduced sitting time at work. Use could be promoted by emphasizing the health benefits, providing guidance on appropriate set-up and normalizing standing for work-related tasks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3643835
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36438352013-05-04 “Thinking on your feet”: A qualitative evaluation of sit-stand desks in an Australian workplace Grunseit, Anne Carolyn Chau, Josephine Yuk-Yin van der Ploeg, Hidde Pieter Bauman, Adrian BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Epidemiological research has established sitting as a new risk factor for the development of non-communicable chronic disease. Sit-stand desks have been proposed as one strategy to reduce occupational sedentary time. This formative research study evaluated the acceptability and usability of manually and electrically operated sit-stand desks in a medium-sized government organisation located in Sydney, Australia. METHODS: Sitting time pre- and three months post -installation of the sit-stand desks was measured using validated self-report measures. Additionally, three group interviews and one key-informant interview were conducted with staff regarding perceptions about ease of, and barriers to, use and satisfaction with the sit-stand desks. All interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed for themes regarding usability and acceptability. RESULTS: Of 31 staff, 18 completed baseline questionnaires, and 13 completed follow-up questionnaires. The median proportion of sitting time for work was 85% (range 50%-95%) at baseline and 60% (range 10%-95%) at follow-up. Formal statistical testing of paired data (n=11) showed that the change from baseline to follow-up in time spent sitting (mean change=1.7 hours, p=.014) was statistically significant. From the qualitative data, reasons given for initiating use of the desks in the standing position were the potential health benefits, or a willingness to experiment or through external prompting. Factors influencing continued use included: concern for, and experience of, short and long term health impacts; perceived productivity whilst sitting and standing; practical accommodation of transitions between sitting and standing; electric or manual operation height adjustment. Several trajectories in patterns of initiation and continued use were identified that centered on the source and timing of commitment to using the desk in the standing position. CONCLUSIONS: Sit-stand desks had high usability and acceptability and reduced sitting time at work. Use could be promoted by emphasizing the health benefits, providing guidance on appropriate set-up and normalizing standing for work-related tasks. BioMed Central 2013-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3643835/ /pubmed/23597291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-365 Text en Copyright © 2013 Grunseit et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Grunseit, Anne Carolyn
Chau, Josephine Yuk-Yin
van der Ploeg, Hidde Pieter
Bauman, Adrian
“Thinking on your feet”: A qualitative evaluation of sit-stand desks in an Australian workplace
title “Thinking on your feet”: A qualitative evaluation of sit-stand desks in an Australian workplace
title_full “Thinking on your feet”: A qualitative evaluation of sit-stand desks in an Australian workplace
title_fullStr “Thinking on your feet”: A qualitative evaluation of sit-stand desks in an Australian workplace
title_full_unstemmed “Thinking on your feet”: A qualitative evaluation of sit-stand desks in an Australian workplace
title_short “Thinking on your feet”: A qualitative evaluation of sit-stand desks in an Australian workplace
title_sort “thinking on your feet”: a qualitative evaluation of sit-stand desks in an australian workplace
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3643835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23597291
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-365
work_keys_str_mv AT grunseitannecarolyn thinkingonyourfeetaqualitativeevaluationofsitstanddesksinanaustralianworkplace
AT chaujosephineyukyin thinkingonyourfeetaqualitativeevaluationofsitstanddesksinanaustralianworkplace
AT vanderploeghiddepieter thinkingonyourfeetaqualitativeevaluationofsitstanddesksinanaustralianworkplace
AT baumanadrian thinkingonyourfeetaqualitativeevaluationofsitstanddesksinanaustralianworkplace