Cargando…

Antibiograms from community-acquired uropathogens in Gulu, northern Uganda - a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Urinary tract infections (UTI) are common in clinical practice and empirical treatment is largely employed due to predictability of pathogens. However, variations in antibiotic sensitivity patterns do occur, and documentation is needed to inform local empirical therapy. The current editi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Odongo, Charles O, Anywar, Denis A, Luryamamoi, Kenneth, Odongo, Pancras
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3643887/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23627344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-13-193
_version_ 1782268391180992512
author Odongo, Charles O
Anywar, Denis A
Luryamamoi, Kenneth
Odongo, Pancras
author_facet Odongo, Charles O
Anywar, Denis A
Luryamamoi, Kenneth
Odongo, Pancras
author_sort Odongo, Charles O
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Urinary tract infections (UTI) are common in clinical practice and empirical treatment is largely employed due to predictability of pathogens. However, variations in antibiotic sensitivity patterns do occur, and documentation is needed to inform local empirical therapy. The current edition of the Uganda Clinical Guidelines recommends amoxicillin or cotrimoxazole as choice drugs for empirical treatment of community-acquired UTI. From our clinical observations, we suspected that this recommendation was not effective in our setting. In order to examine validity, we sought to identify bacteria from community-acquired infections and determine their susceptibility against these antibiotics plus a range of potentially useful alternatives for treatment of UTI. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of mid-stream urine collected from 339 symptomatic patients over a three-month period at Gulu regional referral hospital. Qualitative culture and identification of bacteria and antibiotic sensitivity testing using the modified Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method was done. Participants’ demographic and clinical characteristics were collected using a standard form. Results were analyzed by simple proportions among related variables and confidence intervals computed using binomial exact distribution. RESULTS: Eighty two cultures were positive for UTI. Staphylococcus spp (46.3%) and Escherichia coli (39%) were the most common pathogens. There was high resistance to cotrimoxazole (73.2%), nalidixic acid (52.4%) and amoxicillin (51.2%). The most favorable antibiograms were obtained with gentamicin, amoxicillin-clavulanate and levofloxacin where 85.4%, 72.0%, 67.1% of isolates respectively, were either sensitive or intermediate. Only 51% of isolates were sensitive to ciprofloxacin. CONCLUSION: There was high resistance to most antibiotics tested in this study. The recommendations contained in the current edition of the Uganda Clinical Guidelines are not in tandem with antibiotic sensitivity pattern of uropathogens seen in our setting. Amoxicillin-clavulanate or gentamicin should be considered for replacement of amoxicillin and cotrimoxazole for empirical treatment of UTI in our setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3643887
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36438872013-05-04 Antibiograms from community-acquired uropathogens in Gulu, northern Uganda - a cross-sectional study Odongo, Charles O Anywar, Denis A Luryamamoi, Kenneth Odongo, Pancras BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Urinary tract infections (UTI) are common in clinical practice and empirical treatment is largely employed due to predictability of pathogens. However, variations in antibiotic sensitivity patterns do occur, and documentation is needed to inform local empirical therapy. The current edition of the Uganda Clinical Guidelines recommends amoxicillin or cotrimoxazole as choice drugs for empirical treatment of community-acquired UTI. From our clinical observations, we suspected that this recommendation was not effective in our setting. In order to examine validity, we sought to identify bacteria from community-acquired infections and determine their susceptibility against these antibiotics plus a range of potentially useful alternatives for treatment of UTI. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of mid-stream urine collected from 339 symptomatic patients over a three-month period at Gulu regional referral hospital. Qualitative culture and identification of bacteria and antibiotic sensitivity testing using the modified Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method was done. Participants’ demographic and clinical characteristics were collected using a standard form. Results were analyzed by simple proportions among related variables and confidence intervals computed using binomial exact distribution. RESULTS: Eighty two cultures were positive for UTI. Staphylococcus spp (46.3%) and Escherichia coli (39%) were the most common pathogens. There was high resistance to cotrimoxazole (73.2%), nalidixic acid (52.4%) and amoxicillin (51.2%). The most favorable antibiograms were obtained with gentamicin, amoxicillin-clavulanate and levofloxacin where 85.4%, 72.0%, 67.1% of isolates respectively, were either sensitive or intermediate. Only 51% of isolates were sensitive to ciprofloxacin. CONCLUSION: There was high resistance to most antibiotics tested in this study. The recommendations contained in the current edition of the Uganda Clinical Guidelines are not in tandem with antibiotic sensitivity pattern of uropathogens seen in our setting. Amoxicillin-clavulanate or gentamicin should be considered for replacement of amoxicillin and cotrimoxazole for empirical treatment of UTI in our setting. BioMed Central 2013-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3643887/ /pubmed/23627344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-13-193 Text en Copyright © 2013 Odongo et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Odongo, Charles O
Anywar, Denis A
Luryamamoi, Kenneth
Odongo, Pancras
Antibiograms from community-acquired uropathogens in Gulu, northern Uganda - a cross-sectional study
title Antibiograms from community-acquired uropathogens in Gulu, northern Uganda - a cross-sectional study
title_full Antibiograms from community-acquired uropathogens in Gulu, northern Uganda - a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Antibiograms from community-acquired uropathogens in Gulu, northern Uganda - a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Antibiograms from community-acquired uropathogens in Gulu, northern Uganda - a cross-sectional study
title_short Antibiograms from community-acquired uropathogens in Gulu, northern Uganda - a cross-sectional study
title_sort antibiograms from community-acquired uropathogens in gulu, northern uganda - a cross-sectional study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3643887/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23627344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-13-193
work_keys_str_mv AT odongocharleso antibiogramsfromcommunityacquireduropathogensingulunorthernugandaacrosssectionalstudy
AT anywardenisa antibiogramsfromcommunityacquireduropathogensingulunorthernugandaacrosssectionalstudy
AT luryamamoikenneth antibiogramsfromcommunityacquireduropathogensingulunorthernugandaacrosssectionalstudy
AT odongopancras antibiogramsfromcommunityacquireduropathogensingulunorthernugandaacrosssectionalstudy