Cargando…

Comparative genomic analysis of four representative plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in Pseudomonas

BACKGROUND: Some Pseudomonas strains function as predominant plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR). Within this group, Pseudomonas chlororaphis and Pseudomonas fluorescens are non-pathogenic biocontrol agents, and some Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Pseudomonas stutzeri strains are PGPR. P. chloro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shen, Xuemei, Hu, Hongbo, Peng, Huasong, Wang, Wei, Zhang, Xuehong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3644233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23607266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-271
_version_ 1782268434533318656
author Shen, Xuemei
Hu, Hongbo
Peng, Huasong
Wang, Wei
Zhang, Xuehong
author_facet Shen, Xuemei
Hu, Hongbo
Peng, Huasong
Wang, Wei
Zhang, Xuehong
author_sort Shen, Xuemei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Some Pseudomonas strains function as predominant plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR). Within this group, Pseudomonas chlororaphis and Pseudomonas fluorescens are non-pathogenic biocontrol agents, and some Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Pseudomonas stutzeri strains are PGPR. P. chlororaphis GP72 is a plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium with a fully sequenced genome. We conducted a genomic analysis comparing GP72 with three other pseudomonad PGPR: P. fluorescens Pf-5, P. aeruginosa M18, and the nitrogen-fixing strain P. stutzeri A1501. Our aim was to identify the similarities and differences among these strains using a comparative genomic approach to clarify the mechanisms of plant growth-promoting activity. RESULTS: The genome sizes of GP72, Pf-5, M18, and A1501 ranged from 4.6 to 7.1 M, and the number of protein-coding genes varied among the four species. Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COGs) analysis assigned functions to predicted proteins. The COGs distributions were similar among the four species. However, the percentage of genes encoding transposases and their inactivated derivatives (COG L) was 1.33% of the total genes with COGs classifications in A1501, 0.21% in GP72, 0.02% in Pf-5, and 0.11% in M18. A phylogenetic analysis indicated that GP72 and Pf-5 were the most closely related strains, consistent with the genome alignment results. Comparisons of predicted coding sequences (CDSs) between GP72 and Pf-5 revealed 3544 conserved genes. There were fewer conserved genes when GP72 CDSs were compared with those of A1501 and M18. Comparisons among the four Pseudomonas species revealed 603 conserved genes in GP72, illustrating common plant growth-promoting traits shared among these PGPR. Conserved genes were related to catabolism, transport of plant-derived compounds, stress resistance, and rhizosphere colonization. Some strain-specific CDSs were related to different kinds of biocontrol activities or plant growth promotion. The GP72 genome contained the cus operon (related to heavy metal resistance) and a gene cluster involved in type IV pilus biosynthesis, which confers adhesion ability. CONCLUSIONS: Comparative genomic analysis of four representative PGPR revealed some conserved regions, indicating common characteristics (metabolism of plant-derived compounds, heavy metal resistance, and rhizosphere colonization) among these pseudomonad PGPR. Genomic regions specific to each strain provide clues to its lifestyle, ecological adaptation, and physiological role in the rhizosphere.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3644233
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36442332013-05-05 Comparative genomic analysis of four representative plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in Pseudomonas Shen, Xuemei Hu, Hongbo Peng, Huasong Wang, Wei Zhang, Xuehong BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: Some Pseudomonas strains function as predominant plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR). Within this group, Pseudomonas chlororaphis and Pseudomonas fluorescens are non-pathogenic biocontrol agents, and some Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Pseudomonas stutzeri strains are PGPR. P. chlororaphis GP72 is a plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium with a fully sequenced genome. We conducted a genomic analysis comparing GP72 with three other pseudomonad PGPR: P. fluorescens Pf-5, P. aeruginosa M18, and the nitrogen-fixing strain P. stutzeri A1501. Our aim was to identify the similarities and differences among these strains using a comparative genomic approach to clarify the mechanisms of plant growth-promoting activity. RESULTS: The genome sizes of GP72, Pf-5, M18, and A1501 ranged from 4.6 to 7.1 M, and the number of protein-coding genes varied among the four species. Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COGs) analysis assigned functions to predicted proteins. The COGs distributions were similar among the four species. However, the percentage of genes encoding transposases and their inactivated derivatives (COG L) was 1.33% of the total genes with COGs classifications in A1501, 0.21% in GP72, 0.02% in Pf-5, and 0.11% in M18. A phylogenetic analysis indicated that GP72 and Pf-5 were the most closely related strains, consistent with the genome alignment results. Comparisons of predicted coding sequences (CDSs) between GP72 and Pf-5 revealed 3544 conserved genes. There were fewer conserved genes when GP72 CDSs were compared with those of A1501 and M18. Comparisons among the four Pseudomonas species revealed 603 conserved genes in GP72, illustrating common plant growth-promoting traits shared among these PGPR. Conserved genes were related to catabolism, transport of plant-derived compounds, stress resistance, and rhizosphere colonization. Some strain-specific CDSs were related to different kinds of biocontrol activities or plant growth promotion. The GP72 genome contained the cus operon (related to heavy metal resistance) and a gene cluster involved in type IV pilus biosynthesis, which confers adhesion ability. CONCLUSIONS: Comparative genomic analysis of four representative PGPR revealed some conserved regions, indicating common characteristics (metabolism of plant-derived compounds, heavy metal resistance, and rhizosphere colonization) among these pseudomonad PGPR. Genomic regions specific to each strain provide clues to its lifestyle, ecological adaptation, and physiological role in the rhizosphere. BioMed Central 2013-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3644233/ /pubmed/23607266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-271 Text en Copyright © 2013 Shen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Shen, Xuemei
Hu, Hongbo
Peng, Huasong
Wang, Wei
Zhang, Xuehong
Comparative genomic analysis of four representative plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in Pseudomonas
title Comparative genomic analysis of four representative plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in Pseudomonas
title_full Comparative genomic analysis of four representative plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in Pseudomonas
title_fullStr Comparative genomic analysis of four representative plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in Pseudomonas
title_full_unstemmed Comparative genomic analysis of four representative plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in Pseudomonas
title_short Comparative genomic analysis of four representative plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in Pseudomonas
title_sort comparative genomic analysis of four representative plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in pseudomonas
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3644233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23607266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-271
work_keys_str_mv AT shenxuemei comparativegenomicanalysisoffourrepresentativeplantgrowthpromotingrhizobacteriainpseudomonas
AT huhongbo comparativegenomicanalysisoffourrepresentativeplantgrowthpromotingrhizobacteriainpseudomonas
AT penghuasong comparativegenomicanalysisoffourrepresentativeplantgrowthpromotingrhizobacteriainpseudomonas
AT wangwei comparativegenomicanalysisoffourrepresentativeplantgrowthpromotingrhizobacteriainpseudomonas
AT zhangxuehong comparativegenomicanalysisoffourrepresentativeplantgrowthpromotingrhizobacteriainpseudomonas