Cargando…
The effectiveness of a graphical presentation in addition to a frequency format in the context of familial breast cancer risk communication: a multicenter controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Inadequate understanding of risk among counselees is a common problem in familial cancer clinics. It has been suggested that graphical displays can help counselees understand cancer risks and subsequent decision-making. We evaluated the effects of a graphical presentation in addition to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3644257/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23627498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-13-55 |
_version_ | 1782268440092868608 |
---|---|
author | Henneman, Lidewij Oosterwijk, Jan C van Asperen, Christi J Menko, Fred H Ockhuysen-Vermey, Caroline F Kostense, Piet J Claassen, Liesbeth Timmermans, Daniëlle RM |
author_facet | Henneman, Lidewij Oosterwijk, Jan C van Asperen, Christi J Menko, Fred H Ockhuysen-Vermey, Caroline F Kostense, Piet J Claassen, Liesbeth Timmermans, Daniëlle RM |
author_sort | Henneman, Lidewij |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Inadequate understanding of risk among counselees is a common problem in familial cancer clinics. It has been suggested that graphical displays can help counselees understand cancer risks and subsequent decision-making. We evaluated the effects of a graphical presentation in addition to a frequency format on counselees’ understanding, psychological well-being, and preventive intentions. Design: Multicenter controlled trial. Setting: Three familial cancer clinics in the Netherlands. METHODS: Participants: Unaffected women with a breast cancer family history (first-time attendees). Intervention: Immediately after standard genetic counseling, an additional consultation by a trained risk counselor took place where women were presented with their lifetime breast cancer risk in frequency format (X out of 100) (n = 63) or frequency format plus graphical display (10 × 10 human icons) (n = 91). Main outcome measures: understanding of risk (risk accuracy, risk perception), psychological well-being, and intentions regarding cancer prevention. Measurements were assessed using questionnaires at baseline, 2-week and 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: Baseline participant characteristics did not differ between the two groups. In both groups there was an increase in women’s risk accuracy from baseline to follow-up. No significant differences were found between women who received the frequency format and those who received an additional graphical display in terms of understanding, psychological well-being and intentions regarding cancer prevention. The groups did not differ in their evaluation of the process of counseling. CONCLUSION: Women’s personal risk estimation accuracy was generally high at baseline and the results suggest that an additional graphical display does not lead to a significant benefit in terms of increasing understanding of risk, psychological well-being and preventive intentions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials http://ISRCTN14566836 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3644257 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36442572013-05-05 The effectiveness of a graphical presentation in addition to a frequency format in the context of familial breast cancer risk communication: a multicenter controlled trial Henneman, Lidewij Oosterwijk, Jan C van Asperen, Christi J Menko, Fred H Ockhuysen-Vermey, Caroline F Kostense, Piet J Claassen, Liesbeth Timmermans, Daniëlle RM BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: Inadequate understanding of risk among counselees is a common problem in familial cancer clinics. It has been suggested that graphical displays can help counselees understand cancer risks and subsequent decision-making. We evaluated the effects of a graphical presentation in addition to a frequency format on counselees’ understanding, psychological well-being, and preventive intentions. Design: Multicenter controlled trial. Setting: Three familial cancer clinics in the Netherlands. METHODS: Participants: Unaffected women with a breast cancer family history (first-time attendees). Intervention: Immediately after standard genetic counseling, an additional consultation by a trained risk counselor took place where women were presented with their lifetime breast cancer risk in frequency format (X out of 100) (n = 63) or frequency format plus graphical display (10 × 10 human icons) (n = 91). Main outcome measures: understanding of risk (risk accuracy, risk perception), psychological well-being, and intentions regarding cancer prevention. Measurements were assessed using questionnaires at baseline, 2-week and 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: Baseline participant characteristics did not differ between the two groups. In both groups there was an increase in women’s risk accuracy from baseline to follow-up. No significant differences were found between women who received the frequency format and those who received an additional graphical display in terms of understanding, psychological well-being and intentions regarding cancer prevention. The groups did not differ in their evaluation of the process of counseling. CONCLUSION: Women’s personal risk estimation accuracy was generally high at baseline and the results suggest that an additional graphical display does not lead to a significant benefit in terms of increasing understanding of risk, psychological well-being and preventive intentions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials http://ISRCTN14566836 BioMed Central 2013-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3644257/ /pubmed/23627498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-13-55 Text en Copyright © 2013 Henneman et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Henneman, Lidewij Oosterwijk, Jan C van Asperen, Christi J Menko, Fred H Ockhuysen-Vermey, Caroline F Kostense, Piet J Claassen, Liesbeth Timmermans, Daniëlle RM The effectiveness of a graphical presentation in addition to a frequency format in the context of familial breast cancer risk communication: a multicenter controlled trial |
title | The effectiveness of a graphical presentation in addition to a frequency format in the context of familial breast cancer risk communication: a multicenter controlled trial |
title_full | The effectiveness of a graphical presentation in addition to a frequency format in the context of familial breast cancer risk communication: a multicenter controlled trial |
title_fullStr | The effectiveness of a graphical presentation in addition to a frequency format in the context of familial breast cancer risk communication: a multicenter controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The effectiveness of a graphical presentation in addition to a frequency format in the context of familial breast cancer risk communication: a multicenter controlled trial |
title_short | The effectiveness of a graphical presentation in addition to a frequency format in the context of familial breast cancer risk communication: a multicenter controlled trial |
title_sort | effectiveness of a graphical presentation in addition to a frequency format in the context of familial breast cancer risk communication: a multicenter controlled trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3644257/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23627498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-13-55 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hennemanlidewij theeffectivenessofagraphicalpresentationinadditiontoafrequencyformatinthecontextoffamilialbreastcancerriskcommunicationamulticentercontrolledtrial AT oosterwijkjanc theeffectivenessofagraphicalpresentationinadditiontoafrequencyformatinthecontextoffamilialbreastcancerriskcommunicationamulticentercontrolledtrial AT vanasperenchristij theeffectivenessofagraphicalpresentationinadditiontoafrequencyformatinthecontextoffamilialbreastcancerriskcommunicationamulticentercontrolledtrial AT menkofredh theeffectivenessofagraphicalpresentationinadditiontoafrequencyformatinthecontextoffamilialbreastcancerriskcommunicationamulticentercontrolledtrial AT ockhuysenvermeycarolinef theeffectivenessofagraphicalpresentationinadditiontoafrequencyformatinthecontextoffamilialbreastcancerriskcommunicationamulticentercontrolledtrial AT kostensepietj theeffectivenessofagraphicalpresentationinadditiontoafrequencyformatinthecontextoffamilialbreastcancerriskcommunicationamulticentercontrolledtrial AT claassenliesbeth theeffectivenessofagraphicalpresentationinadditiontoafrequencyformatinthecontextoffamilialbreastcancerriskcommunicationamulticentercontrolledtrial AT timmermansdaniellerm theeffectivenessofagraphicalpresentationinadditiontoafrequencyformatinthecontextoffamilialbreastcancerriskcommunicationamulticentercontrolledtrial AT hennemanlidewij effectivenessofagraphicalpresentationinadditiontoafrequencyformatinthecontextoffamilialbreastcancerriskcommunicationamulticentercontrolledtrial AT oosterwijkjanc effectivenessofagraphicalpresentationinadditiontoafrequencyformatinthecontextoffamilialbreastcancerriskcommunicationamulticentercontrolledtrial AT vanasperenchristij effectivenessofagraphicalpresentationinadditiontoafrequencyformatinthecontextoffamilialbreastcancerriskcommunicationamulticentercontrolledtrial AT menkofredh effectivenessofagraphicalpresentationinadditiontoafrequencyformatinthecontextoffamilialbreastcancerriskcommunicationamulticentercontrolledtrial AT ockhuysenvermeycarolinef effectivenessofagraphicalpresentationinadditiontoafrequencyformatinthecontextoffamilialbreastcancerriskcommunicationamulticentercontrolledtrial AT kostensepietj effectivenessofagraphicalpresentationinadditiontoafrequencyformatinthecontextoffamilialbreastcancerriskcommunicationamulticentercontrolledtrial AT claassenliesbeth effectivenessofagraphicalpresentationinadditiontoafrequencyformatinthecontextoffamilialbreastcancerriskcommunicationamulticentercontrolledtrial AT timmermansdaniellerm effectivenessofagraphicalpresentationinadditiontoafrequencyformatinthecontextoffamilialbreastcancerriskcommunicationamulticentercontrolledtrial |