Cargando…

The effectiveness of a graphical presentation in addition to a frequency format in the context of familial breast cancer risk communication: a multicenter controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Inadequate understanding of risk among counselees is a common problem in familial cancer clinics. It has been suggested that graphical displays can help counselees understand cancer risks and subsequent decision-making. We evaluated the effects of a graphical presentation in addition to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Henneman, Lidewij, Oosterwijk, Jan C, van Asperen, Christi J, Menko, Fred H, Ockhuysen-Vermey, Caroline F, Kostense, Piet J, Claassen, Liesbeth, Timmermans, Daniëlle RM
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3644257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23627498
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-13-55
_version_ 1782268440092868608
author Henneman, Lidewij
Oosterwijk, Jan C
van Asperen, Christi J
Menko, Fred H
Ockhuysen-Vermey, Caroline F
Kostense, Piet J
Claassen, Liesbeth
Timmermans, Daniëlle RM
author_facet Henneman, Lidewij
Oosterwijk, Jan C
van Asperen, Christi J
Menko, Fred H
Ockhuysen-Vermey, Caroline F
Kostense, Piet J
Claassen, Liesbeth
Timmermans, Daniëlle RM
author_sort Henneman, Lidewij
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Inadequate understanding of risk among counselees is a common problem in familial cancer clinics. It has been suggested that graphical displays can help counselees understand cancer risks and subsequent decision-making. We evaluated the effects of a graphical presentation in addition to a frequency format on counselees’ understanding, psychological well-being, and preventive intentions. Design: Multicenter controlled trial. Setting: Three familial cancer clinics in the Netherlands. METHODS: Participants: Unaffected women with a breast cancer family history (first-time attendees). Intervention: Immediately after standard genetic counseling, an additional consultation by a trained risk counselor took place where women were presented with their lifetime breast cancer risk in frequency format (X out of 100) (n = 63) or frequency format plus graphical display (10 × 10 human icons) (n = 91). Main outcome measures: understanding of risk (risk accuracy, risk perception), psychological well-being, and intentions regarding cancer prevention. Measurements were assessed using questionnaires at baseline, 2-week and 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: Baseline participant characteristics did not differ between the two groups. In both groups there was an increase in women’s risk accuracy from baseline to follow-up. No significant differences were found between women who received the frequency format and those who received an additional graphical display in terms of understanding, psychological well-being and intentions regarding cancer prevention. The groups did not differ in their evaluation of the process of counseling. CONCLUSION: Women’s personal risk estimation accuracy was generally high at baseline and the results suggest that an additional graphical display does not lead to a significant benefit in terms of increasing understanding of risk, psychological well-being and preventive intentions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials http://ISRCTN14566836
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3644257
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36442572013-05-05 The effectiveness of a graphical presentation in addition to a frequency format in the context of familial breast cancer risk communication: a multicenter controlled trial Henneman, Lidewij Oosterwijk, Jan C van Asperen, Christi J Menko, Fred H Ockhuysen-Vermey, Caroline F Kostense, Piet J Claassen, Liesbeth Timmermans, Daniëlle RM BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: Inadequate understanding of risk among counselees is a common problem in familial cancer clinics. It has been suggested that graphical displays can help counselees understand cancer risks and subsequent decision-making. We evaluated the effects of a graphical presentation in addition to a frequency format on counselees’ understanding, psychological well-being, and preventive intentions. Design: Multicenter controlled trial. Setting: Three familial cancer clinics in the Netherlands. METHODS: Participants: Unaffected women with a breast cancer family history (first-time attendees). Intervention: Immediately after standard genetic counseling, an additional consultation by a trained risk counselor took place where women were presented with their lifetime breast cancer risk in frequency format (X out of 100) (n = 63) or frequency format plus graphical display (10 × 10 human icons) (n = 91). Main outcome measures: understanding of risk (risk accuracy, risk perception), psychological well-being, and intentions regarding cancer prevention. Measurements were assessed using questionnaires at baseline, 2-week and 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: Baseline participant characteristics did not differ between the two groups. In both groups there was an increase in women’s risk accuracy from baseline to follow-up. No significant differences were found between women who received the frequency format and those who received an additional graphical display in terms of understanding, psychological well-being and intentions regarding cancer prevention. The groups did not differ in their evaluation of the process of counseling. CONCLUSION: Women’s personal risk estimation accuracy was generally high at baseline and the results suggest that an additional graphical display does not lead to a significant benefit in terms of increasing understanding of risk, psychological well-being and preventive intentions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials http://ISRCTN14566836 BioMed Central 2013-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3644257/ /pubmed/23627498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-13-55 Text en Copyright © 2013 Henneman et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Henneman, Lidewij
Oosterwijk, Jan C
van Asperen, Christi J
Menko, Fred H
Ockhuysen-Vermey, Caroline F
Kostense, Piet J
Claassen, Liesbeth
Timmermans, Daniëlle RM
The effectiveness of a graphical presentation in addition to a frequency format in the context of familial breast cancer risk communication: a multicenter controlled trial
title The effectiveness of a graphical presentation in addition to a frequency format in the context of familial breast cancer risk communication: a multicenter controlled trial
title_full The effectiveness of a graphical presentation in addition to a frequency format in the context of familial breast cancer risk communication: a multicenter controlled trial
title_fullStr The effectiveness of a graphical presentation in addition to a frequency format in the context of familial breast cancer risk communication: a multicenter controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness of a graphical presentation in addition to a frequency format in the context of familial breast cancer risk communication: a multicenter controlled trial
title_short The effectiveness of a graphical presentation in addition to a frequency format in the context of familial breast cancer risk communication: a multicenter controlled trial
title_sort effectiveness of a graphical presentation in addition to a frequency format in the context of familial breast cancer risk communication: a multicenter controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3644257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23627498
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-13-55
work_keys_str_mv AT hennemanlidewij theeffectivenessofagraphicalpresentationinadditiontoafrequencyformatinthecontextoffamilialbreastcancerriskcommunicationamulticentercontrolledtrial
AT oosterwijkjanc theeffectivenessofagraphicalpresentationinadditiontoafrequencyformatinthecontextoffamilialbreastcancerriskcommunicationamulticentercontrolledtrial
AT vanasperenchristij theeffectivenessofagraphicalpresentationinadditiontoafrequencyformatinthecontextoffamilialbreastcancerriskcommunicationamulticentercontrolledtrial
AT menkofredh theeffectivenessofagraphicalpresentationinadditiontoafrequencyformatinthecontextoffamilialbreastcancerriskcommunicationamulticentercontrolledtrial
AT ockhuysenvermeycarolinef theeffectivenessofagraphicalpresentationinadditiontoafrequencyformatinthecontextoffamilialbreastcancerriskcommunicationamulticentercontrolledtrial
AT kostensepietj theeffectivenessofagraphicalpresentationinadditiontoafrequencyformatinthecontextoffamilialbreastcancerriskcommunicationamulticentercontrolledtrial
AT claassenliesbeth theeffectivenessofagraphicalpresentationinadditiontoafrequencyformatinthecontextoffamilialbreastcancerriskcommunicationamulticentercontrolledtrial
AT timmermansdaniellerm theeffectivenessofagraphicalpresentationinadditiontoafrequencyformatinthecontextoffamilialbreastcancerriskcommunicationamulticentercontrolledtrial
AT hennemanlidewij effectivenessofagraphicalpresentationinadditiontoafrequencyformatinthecontextoffamilialbreastcancerriskcommunicationamulticentercontrolledtrial
AT oosterwijkjanc effectivenessofagraphicalpresentationinadditiontoafrequencyformatinthecontextoffamilialbreastcancerriskcommunicationamulticentercontrolledtrial
AT vanasperenchristij effectivenessofagraphicalpresentationinadditiontoafrequencyformatinthecontextoffamilialbreastcancerriskcommunicationamulticentercontrolledtrial
AT menkofredh effectivenessofagraphicalpresentationinadditiontoafrequencyformatinthecontextoffamilialbreastcancerriskcommunicationamulticentercontrolledtrial
AT ockhuysenvermeycarolinef effectivenessofagraphicalpresentationinadditiontoafrequencyformatinthecontextoffamilialbreastcancerriskcommunicationamulticentercontrolledtrial
AT kostensepietj effectivenessofagraphicalpresentationinadditiontoafrequencyformatinthecontextoffamilialbreastcancerriskcommunicationamulticentercontrolledtrial
AT claassenliesbeth effectivenessofagraphicalpresentationinadditiontoafrequencyformatinthecontextoffamilialbreastcancerriskcommunicationamulticentercontrolledtrial
AT timmermansdaniellerm effectivenessofagraphicalpresentationinadditiontoafrequencyformatinthecontextoffamilialbreastcancerriskcommunicationamulticentercontrolledtrial