Cargando…

A graphical tool for locating inconsistency in network meta-analyses

BACKGROUND: In network meta-analyses, several treatments can be compared by connecting evidence from clinical trials that have investigated two or more treatments. The resulting trial network allows estimating the relative effects of all pairs of treatments taking indirect evidence into account. For...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krahn, Ulrike, Binder, Harald, König, Jochem
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3644268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23496991
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-35
_version_ 1782268442652442624
author Krahn, Ulrike
Binder, Harald
König, Jochem
author_facet Krahn, Ulrike
Binder, Harald
König, Jochem
author_sort Krahn, Ulrike
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In network meta-analyses, several treatments can be compared by connecting evidence from clinical trials that have investigated two or more treatments. The resulting trial network allows estimating the relative effects of all pairs of treatments taking indirect evidence into account. For a valid analysis of the network, consistent information from different pathways is assumed. Consistency can be checked by contrasting effect estimates from direct comparisons with the evidence of the remaining network. Unfortunately, one deviating direct comparison may have side effects on the network estimates of others, thus producing hot spots of inconsistency. METHODS: We provide a tool, the net heat plot, to render transparent which direct comparisons drive each network estimate and to display hot spots of inconsistency: this permits singling out which of the suspicious direct comparisons are sufficient to explain the presence of inconsistency. We base our methods on fixed-effects models. For disclosure of potential drivers, the plot comprises the contribution of each direct estimate to network estimates resulting from regression diagnostics. In combination, we show heat colors corresponding to the change in agreement between direct and indirect estimate when relaxing the assumption of consistency for one direct comparison. A clustering procedure is applied to the heat matrix in order to find hot spots of inconsistency. RESULTS: The method is shown to work with several examples, which are constructed by perturbing the effect of single study designs, and with two published network meta-analyses. Once the possible sources of inconsistencies are identified, our method also reveals which network estimates they affect. CONCLUSION: Our proposal is seen to be useful for identifying sources of inconsistencies in the network together with the interrelatedness of effect estimates. It opens the way for a further analysis based on subject matter considerations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3644268
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36442682013-05-10 A graphical tool for locating inconsistency in network meta-analyses Krahn, Ulrike Binder, Harald König, Jochem BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: In network meta-analyses, several treatments can be compared by connecting evidence from clinical trials that have investigated two or more treatments. The resulting trial network allows estimating the relative effects of all pairs of treatments taking indirect evidence into account. For a valid analysis of the network, consistent information from different pathways is assumed. Consistency can be checked by contrasting effect estimates from direct comparisons with the evidence of the remaining network. Unfortunately, one deviating direct comparison may have side effects on the network estimates of others, thus producing hot spots of inconsistency. METHODS: We provide a tool, the net heat plot, to render transparent which direct comparisons drive each network estimate and to display hot spots of inconsistency: this permits singling out which of the suspicious direct comparisons are sufficient to explain the presence of inconsistency. We base our methods on fixed-effects models. For disclosure of potential drivers, the plot comprises the contribution of each direct estimate to network estimates resulting from regression diagnostics. In combination, we show heat colors corresponding to the change in agreement between direct and indirect estimate when relaxing the assumption of consistency for one direct comparison. A clustering procedure is applied to the heat matrix in order to find hot spots of inconsistency. RESULTS: The method is shown to work with several examples, which are constructed by perturbing the effect of single study designs, and with two published network meta-analyses. Once the possible sources of inconsistencies are identified, our method also reveals which network estimates they affect. CONCLUSION: Our proposal is seen to be useful for identifying sources of inconsistencies in the network together with the interrelatedness of effect estimates. It opens the way for a further analysis based on subject matter considerations. BioMed Central 2013-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3644268/ /pubmed/23496991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-35 Text en Copyright © 2013 Krahn et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Krahn, Ulrike
Binder, Harald
König, Jochem
A graphical tool for locating inconsistency in network meta-analyses
title A graphical tool for locating inconsistency in network meta-analyses
title_full A graphical tool for locating inconsistency in network meta-analyses
title_fullStr A graphical tool for locating inconsistency in network meta-analyses
title_full_unstemmed A graphical tool for locating inconsistency in network meta-analyses
title_short A graphical tool for locating inconsistency in network meta-analyses
title_sort graphical tool for locating inconsistency in network meta-analyses
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3644268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23496991
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-35
work_keys_str_mv AT krahnulrike agraphicaltoolforlocatinginconsistencyinnetworkmetaanalyses
AT binderharald agraphicaltoolforlocatinginconsistencyinnetworkmetaanalyses
AT konigjochem agraphicaltoolforlocatinginconsistencyinnetworkmetaanalyses
AT krahnulrike graphicaltoolforlocatinginconsistencyinnetworkmetaanalyses
AT binderharald graphicaltoolforlocatinginconsistencyinnetworkmetaanalyses
AT konigjochem graphicaltoolforlocatinginconsistencyinnetworkmetaanalyses